Jump to content

BangkokReady

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BangkokReady

  1. I've seen plenty. Normally on the pavement or going the wrong way down a street, completely silent so you don't know they're coming, weaving around people and taking them completely by surprise.
  2. Thailand doesn't condemn anything. It's a cultural thing. Thai people generally don't condemn or speak out against anything either. It's about avoiding any possible negative consequences.
  3. You literally just said that "Violence is never necessary".
  4. The victim wasn't even Thai, let alone a Thai doctor. 🤷‍♂️
  5. Presumably this just means they'll be shouting/fighting back with the Russians... 🤔
  6. I wonder how long it will be before people are watching AIs set to "left-wing" argue with AIs set to "right-wing" in online forums. Or perhaps it's already happening... 🤔
  7. Lol. This is completely untrue. It's the exact opposite and that's why you've started with the insults. Not even slightly. 🙄 I'm going opt to not "feed the troll". Have a great night.
  8. You think that perfectly correct sentence was gibberish? That explains a lot... 🙄 But please, continue with the insults now that you've run out of things to get wrong.
  9. 🙄 Where does this back up anything you've said? Can you explain?
  10. So, when you realise that you're losing, you just start with the insults? Sad.
  11. The point remains that he was not threatened with arrest for "being Jewish". Disrupt the topic? You mean by disagreeing with something that was said? Like people always do? Is it perhaps more a case of you not liking what I am saying and would rather I did not say it? That's exactly what I'm talking about. The fact that he wasn't threatened with arrest for "being Jewish". Hardly. I simply corrected someone.
  12. I'm listening to everything you say, and thinking carefully about it, but you're wrong.
  13. What right of protest is that? Can you cite it? Does it trump public safety? Can people do whatever they want regardless of the circumstances due to "right to protest"? (They can't, obviously.) It doesn't. You're wrong in pretty much everything you say.
  14. I assume you're smart enough to realise that was a typo. Not in the slightest. People are trying to claim that he was threatened with arrest for being Jewish, which is not the case. Again, no, he was threatened with arrest to prevent a breach of the peace, not for being "identifiably Jewish". He wasn't threatened with arrest for being Jewish, nor was he threatened with arrest for being identifiably Jewish. You're wrong.
  15. I think the article makes it fairly clear. He intended to approach the group of protestors and the police believed that this could lead to a breach of the peace.
  16. No trolling here. You need to back up what you say. Simple as that. If you're right (you're not), then it should be easy for you to explain (it won't).
  17. No. You substantiate your claim. "Please prove my claim for me." 🙄
  18. No. They thought his actions might lead to a breach of the peace. Please read the article and my comments properly. You're wasting both our time.
×
×
  • Create New...