BangkokReady

Speak for yourself!

I can't believe you let something so trivial bother you so much. You must have such a negative point of view. And then you come and whinge about it here!

Yup. Social distancing, masks, hand sanitiser, lock down everything, for the rest of time. It's the only way. 🤦‍♂️

You sure it's not locals buying the homes?

An oddly racist comment. Why does it matter that they are also old and White? Is young Black males doing it OK to you?

Sounds more like a Dem pushed over the edge.

Nope. Just following the evidence.

He was Dem affiliated. Apparently one victim is considered to have voted out of line with the party. There were "no kings" flyers found in his car. Plus there is already an established pattern of left-wing violence. It seems pretty unlikely that the guy is right-wing.

Any evidence that he's right wing? Everything so far says that he is left wing.

Could be going after perceived "traitor Dems" who voted in a way he disagreed with.

Sure. They need due process. Simply round them up at the protests (all the people dressed on black carrying shields), then investigate and put on trial if links to the domestic terrorist organisation called antifa can be proven.

Trump's political/ideological enemies doing bad things is not evidence of Trump being bad. Not sure why that seems so hard for some to understand. Most likely they/you are simply being dishonest.

Seems like he might be left-wing actually.

Business as usual, but when a foreigner does it it's suddenly a big deal... 🙄

This is the part that she would obviously appreciate being publicised, the truth.

The same reason people watch garbage TV shows.

These are the facts. If you don't like those facts, there isn't much you can do.

Well, the left said "We want to trans your kids, we want male bodies in the private spaces of women and girls, and we want unlimited ideological access to your children", all under the guise of helping children. The right then said, "No". I think most would agree that the right has had a fairly mild response, given what the left wants. So, no. Youre wrong. Not central, and certainly less than the left. So you're wrong again. Are you suggesting that the loony left's obsession with targeting children is hiding a desire to abuse those children?

He knows he's messed up and he's finding it hard to backtrack. He knows the left are generally the "moral crusaders", and that there are more perverts on the left than on the right. I wonder if he regrets starting this thread, as it's made him look even more stupid and dishonest than usual.

What an odd choice of lies to tell. Clearly the left are far more often styled as the "good guys" and the "moral crusaders". The centre/right of centre are a lot more matter of fact. Do you think that people will just beleive whatever nonsense you spew onto your keyboard?

What dawns on me? What on Earth are you talking about? Who said you can't criticise Trump? Criticise whomever you want, as much as you want. What bizarre nonsensical comment. You sound unhinged.

Of course, as it is so clearly dishonest. Your post suggests that an abuser being "right wing" somehow reflects badly on "right wing people". You ignore the fact that there are abusers within all ideologies. Either left wing abusers also reflect badly on the left, making your point meaningless, or when it is a left wing person, it suddenly doesn't reflect on the political affiliation of the abuser, in which case you are being illogical and biased. Either way, you are being dishonest.

Aren't a lot of Dems in favour of males in female spaces and encouraging kids to transition? And that's as policy, not a random person. The same people who would protect children from the "sickos" in the Dem ranks? Parents? Those who have responsibility for their safety and care? The police? You talk like one person doing something means that anyone who happens to follow the same political ideology is in favour of that thing. That's just silly.

More dishonesty form a dishonest person. What about when a Dem person does the same? I guess that's just a coincidence, but when a Republican does it then it reflects on all Republicans? Sad.

LOL. You've got to love the anti-Trump "fact checking". The leaps in logic are very creative. They always seem to follow the same patter. Take something that Trump said completely out of context; change what it means to try to claim he said something else; find some evidence; change what the evidence means; then say "FALSE!". "Trump literally factually claimed that Mexico is invading California. We checked and Mexico has not launched a military invasion of California. Trump is lying!"