placeholder

I started to read it, but as usual for right wingers, he misstated the Russian collusion issue. Then he went on to assert the innocence of Mike Flynn That was enough.

I went there and I got his warning: https://amgreatness.com/2025/01/06/conspiracies-too-awful-to-imagine/ Is Norton in on the conspiracy to undermine Trump?

A claim that somehow what some posters post implies that they are brighter than everything else, may have more to do with an inferiority complex in some members. At any rate, claiming that posts imply something looks more like mindreading to me.

Not only is it the right of private websites to enforce civility, but it also serves to foster a rational exchange of views.

Blood Brothers: Palestinians and Jews Share Genetic Roots Jews break down into three genetic groups, all of which have Middle Eastern origins – which are shared with the Palestinians and Druze. https://www.haaretz.com/science-and-health/2015-10-20/ty-article/palestinians-and-jews-share-genetic-roots/0000017f-dc0e-df9c-a17f-fe1e57730000 Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites, who extensively mixed with Egyptians, Mesopotamian, and Anatolian peoples in ancient times. Thus, Palestinian-Jewish rivalry is based in cultural and religious, but not in genetic, differences. The relatively close relatedness of both Jews and Palestinians to western Mediterranean populations reflects the continuous circum-Mediterranean cultural and gene flow that have occurred in prehistoric and historic times. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/

Well maybe you believe making personal insults and unproven allegations about people who post is somehow civil. But in the bluesky world, that stuff is prohibited. In the discussion I followed there was none of that.

Thanks for the correction. You forget to mention this part: Critically, that report also shot down unsubstantiated speculation that the bureau had agents stoking some of the mayhem that day, “We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6,” the report said. https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents/?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social I am sure you will honorably acknowledge the error in your allegations as well. I'm sure you wouldn't indulge in cherry-picking. I look forward to seeing it in this thread.

No. This rate of change is way outside the norm. Temperatures have been quite stable for the about 2000 years. And suddenly , in line with climatologists predictions, temperatures begin to soar. What an amazing coincidence. To be more accurate, we are in a post glacial period. Whether the glaciers extend themselves once again is not a certainty. But even if they eventually do, what's your point? As for the Little Ice Age: The Little Ice Age Wasn’t Global, but Current Climate Change Is None of the cold and warm epochs from the past 2,000 years were global events, but the current period of climate change is more intense and is happening simultaneously across the entire planet... “Statistically, the spatial coherence of the warming in the last century is totally different from the spatial coherence of any other period in the past,” says study coauthor Juan José Gómez-Navarro, an environmental physicist at the University of Murcia in Spain. https://eos.org/articles/the-little-ice-age-wasnt-global-but-current-climate-change-is#:~:text=Change Is - Eos-,The Little Ice Age Wasn't Global%2C but Current Climate,simultaneously across the entire planet.

One of the ways that people who have nothing to offer in the way of rebuttal is to claim fake news and offer no credible fact in rebuttal.. I will say this for you: you didn't even bother to offer facts. You have nothing

An accurate answer? What does that mean? The problem with your question is that it rests on the assumption that someone is Biden's Whisperer? In that it's similar to a when did you stop beating your wife question because it assume that someone is Biden's whisperer without offering evidence. I did offer evidence in the case of Trump. He did pretty much a 180 degree turn on the issue.

Is your point that they are really Chinese?

I remember when there was a Congresswoman who said not to worry about the extinction of one species because another will come along to replace it. Yours is that kind of thinkiing. Why would it "naturally" come down just as fast as it went up. You think this situation is analagous to shooting an arrow straight up into the air? This is pre-scientific thinking. The laws of physics probably will see the temperature eventually come down after the level of greenhouse gasses comes down. As for brainwashing people...you mean people who won't engage with the science and instead offer conspiracy theories?

Call me a cockeyed optimist but I live in hope of their redemption.

"It must have made her squirm"? More mind reading or body language reading. Your comment is ridiculous. By all accounts she acquitted herself honorably in the performance of her duties on this day. As did Mike Pence when he was in the same position. You've got nothing.

4 informants incited that crowd? Ridiculous. It was a crowd that was chanting Hang Mike Pence. Do you have a source that can identify these 4 alleged informants? Another ridiculous conspiracy theory.

All those lying videos? More conspiracy nonsense.

No. I'm claiming that what you presented as facts are actually falsehoods. Lets start here: "Virtually every illegal alien is on public assistance of some kind." Not even CAIR a highly bigoted and suspect organization claims that: According to them, 59% of undocumented alien households receive benefits.

In the way American law operates, yes he was innocent. What is preventing you from understanding the doctrine of presumption of innocence? It's a bedrock of the US judicial system.

"Post hoc ergo propter hoc" It's the latin phrase to define a logical fallacy. It means "after this therefore because of this." How intimidated would Putin be by someone who said he would consider this? Trump to look at recognizing Crimea as Russian territory, lifting sanctions The United States, along with the EU, has refused to recognize the annexation Donald Trump said Wednesday he would consider recognizing Crimea as Russian territory and lifting the sanctions against the country if he’s elected president. At a wide-ranging news conference, Trump said he “would be looking into that” when asked about his stance on Crimea and Russia. The Crimean Peninsula has been part of Ukraine for decades, but Russian President Vladimir Putin annexed the territory in March 2014 after a popular revolt toppled Kiev’s pro-Russian government. https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-to-look-at-recognizing-crimea-as-russian-territory-lifting-sanctions-putin/

Love how you invoke the trope of "son of immigrants". And the son inherited hundreds of millions from his humble immigrant father. And destroyed the business his father left him. And actually would have gone bankrupt if not for the extraordinary obstacles bankruptcy law put in the way of banks seeking to reclaim their cash.

Members of the "rowdy" crowd beat police officers. And attempted to surge violently into the chambers were members of congress were sequestered. Why were they looking for members of congress? What has that to do with a demonstration. Many were there explicitly to stop the transfer of power..

And he's reversed himself on the question of trade with China. Now he's gung-ho in favor of it.

Odd that you should accuse someone else of a reading comprehension problem. The House of Representatives charged him. That's what impeachment is. They didn't convict him. What do you think it means to charge someone with an offense? "In criminal cases, a charge is a formal accusation of criminal activity. The prosecuting attorney decides on the charges, after reviewing police reports, witness statements, and any other evidence of wrongdoing. Formal charges are announced at an arrested person's arraignment. For example, X was charged with murder." Just because impeachment and trial in the Senate aren't criminal proceedings doesn't mean that they aren't analogous to a criminal proceeding. He was not found guilty.. The impreachment process is analagous to a grand jury investigation. The Senate proceedings are the trial. Here's what a document that you are plainly unfamiliar with, says: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S4-2/ALDE_00000689/ If someone isn't convicted, then they're not guilty. That was a basic tenet of English law and was inherited by the United States. How can someone be found guilty of something if they are not convicted of anything?

A serious issue? Like a stolen election? Or Joe Biden being corrupt? Yours is just ianother conspiracy allegation. On what issues did Biden reverse himself in a way I couldn't be explained by ordinary electoral politics? Whereas Trump's enthusiastic embrace of the H-1B program is a reversal that goes to the heart of what MAGA is all about. I reversal of how he characterized the H-1B program previously.

Swarming with deep state assets? You should be posting this in the fiction forum. These rioters attacked the Constitutionally mandated transfer of power. The heart of a democratic republic.