Jump to content

Only junta backers can benefit from revised political party law


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Only junta backers can benefit from revised political party law

By POLITICAL DESK 
THE SUNDAY NATION

 

6f256dc933c2a2b6794e69d1dceaff64-sld.jpeg

Former People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) leader Suthep Thaugsuban

 

Since the political party organic law was promulgated in October, all politicians have been closing in on the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), calling on it to unleash them from political restraint.

 

But given the recent move by the junta allies – former People’s Democratic Reform Committee (PDRC) leader Suthep Thaugsuban and former member of the nowdefunct National Reform Council Paiboon Nititawan – the unleashing they are getting could go beyond the political ban issue, and with dramatic impact.

 

Two months after the political party law came into effect, Paiboon last week, almost out of the blue, appealed to the National Legislative Assembly (NLA) to consider revisฌing the law in order to deregisฌter all members of all parties so that old and new parties could simฌilarly and fairly start over from scratch in the runup to the election.

 

The law states that existing party members could be exempted from paying membership fees for four years while new parties would have to collect at least Bt1,000 from each new member. That, according to Paiboon, was not fair.

 

A day after the card was played, Suthep, in a rare move, came out and voiced that to be fair with old and new parties alike, the political party organic law should be revised to fit with the current circumstance and to ensure political parties could exactly practise the law.

 

Although he was not specific about the revision, the remark seemed to back and give more weight to Paiboon’s call.

 

It could be just a coincidence that two former leaders of the movement that paved the way for the 2014 coup came out around the same time to call for the organic law, already promulgated, to be amended to ensure fairness among parties. But if the regime really takes up the matter, interest will all be aligned to the NCPO’s side.

For one thing, if the promulgatฌed law were to be amended, the process would take several months at least to complete. And given that it is one of the four organic laws necessary for the holding of an elecฌtion, a vote delay could be expectฌed as a consequence. This was not to mention how the law associated with it – the MPs election organic law – will also need to be revised accordingly, hence prolonging the process as well as the rule of the current regime.

 

But on top of that, the revision could also have subtle effect on political polarisation both in the domestic and interparty levels.

By nullifying existing members of all parties as Paiboon proposes, party members and politicians would all be unleashed and become independent.

 

All cards would be jumbled and some could take this opportunity to shuffle and reposition themselves, getting out of an old party affiliaฌtion and into a new one with fewer hurt feelings among former allies.

 

The depolarisation would weakฌen existing parties but on top of that, it could be a plus for the militarybacked regime.

 

Given the legฌislative and other election preparaฌtions, ongoing military influence even after the election is on the cards. Some politicians may have seen this coming and are considerฌing joining up with a mediumsized party to back up the junta so they could be in the government, too.

 

In addition to the interparty level, a reshuffling would also take place in each party, too, after the deregistration of party members.

 

This could be the case for the Democrat Party, where there is a power struggle between the tradiฌtional democrat faction led by Abhisit Vejjajiva, who is backed by former leader Chuan Leekpai, and the emerging power of the PDRC led by Suthep, which enjoys strong political currency gained during the 2013 movement.

 

If the junta decided to push the reset button, Abhisit’s party leadฌership and the current party execฌutive members would be removed inexorably as their membership to the party is terminated.

 

The vacuum opens an opportuฌnity for the PDRC influence to take hold of the reins of the Democrat Party.

 

And given the alliance between the PDRC and the current regime, it is not hard to imagine how poliฌtics after the election would turn out under this scenario.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30334123

 

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-12-17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, but the junta are doing a good job whereas under Thaksin ......bla bla bla

 

Same old same old. 

 

Also unsurprising that they get away with it since they have cowed all opposition into silence.

 

Where there is silence they call it popular consent and autocracy goes from bad to worse.

 

And when in the end they have absolute power......even from a sham election ......then corruption , graft and nepotism will rise to levels unheard of. This corruption will actually be literally unheard of since with the continuing silence anyone who sticks his head out exposing it will have it promptly cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cant stand people like Paiboon Nititawan. He has been a military ass licker for years and years. Appointed by the military into all their committee etc in the news commenting on this and that, all pro military and anti democracy. I mean who is he and why is his view more important or more correct than anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if an election produced any result other than a win (though probably a plurality rather than a majority) for the TRT/PPP/whatever successor party.  The junta members probably think this as well and so are doing everything they can to not hold an election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, smutcakes said:

Cant stand people like Paiboon Nititawan. He has been a military ass licker for years and years. Appointed by the military into all their committee etc in the news commenting on this and that, all pro military and anti democracy. I mean who is he and why is his view more important or more correct than anyone else?

He and his whole PDRC echelon are just a bunch of hypocrites and the real enemies of democracy. He infamously said that he don’t like democracy and election but yet decided to form a political party. His boss Suthep who said he will not be involved in politics looks like trying to maneuver a power grap in the Dem Party. How these two despicable characters are not in jail either for corruption or the violence that they created during the shutdowns are beyond belief.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

He and his whole PDRC echelon are just a bunch of hypocrites and the real enemies of democracy. He infamously said that he don’t like democracy and election but yet decided to form a political party. His boss Suthep who said he will not be involved in politics looks like trying to maneuver a power grap in the Dem Party. How these two despicable characters are not in jail either for corruption or the violence that they created during the shutdowns are beyond belief.  

2

They're not in jail because they were an essential and integral part in manufacturing the political condition which "justified" the long-planned coup. What is more, the support (acclamation) of the PDRC or whatever Sutheps "movement" will be called is the nearest thing to a mandate that Prayut can hope to get. He will use it, however tenuous, as his reason to remain in power

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...