Jump to content

Is it a Van Gogh? fingers crossed


webfact

Recommended Posts

Is it a Van Gogh? fingers crossed

By PHATARAWADEE PHATARANAWIK 
THE NATION

 

5919958cb7283170452ab3aa0cb4a497.jpeg

Thai singer Haruthai “Au” Muangbunsri shows her painting, “Tree in Winter”, which she believes is a Van Gogh masterpiece, at the Science and Technology Ministry yesterday.

 

IS THE landscape painting that singer Haruthai “Au” Muangbunsri bought at a Bangkok antique shop really a long-lost Van Gogh?
 

She’s spent the past three years trying to prove it is, and now, with the backing of the Synchrotron Light Research Institute and Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology, she’s ready to ship it to the Van Gogh Museum in the Netherlands for the final judgement.

 

The Bangkok store was, after all, selling antiques imported from Europe, so you never know.

 

If the landscape, which she’s titled “Tree in Winter”, proves to be a genuine painting by Vincent Van Gogh, it’ll be worth considerably more than the Bt2,000 Haruthai paid for it. It could fetch many millions of dollars at auction.

 

c05dc4e9bbcc104298cde3a6515d62f7.jpeg

 

Haruthai, a fine-arts graduate of the College Of Fine Arts in Bangkok, has done her own artistic and scientific research in France and the Netherlands. She compared the brushstrokes of her painting to those of the artist as presented online by the Art Project for Van Gogh. She even scrutinised the artist’s letters, archived at the museum in Amsterdam, for mention of the work.

 

More recently Haruthai recruited Synchrotron to examine the painting’s pigments and determine its age. Microscopic study set the age somewhere between the 1700s and 1900s. Van Gogh lived from 1853-1890.

 

1b9c4fb565e9a48b82beb1aea2c42081.jpeg

 

Dr Sasiphan Khaweerat of Synchrotron, who worked in tandem with Dr Kilian Anheuser of Switzerland’s Fine Arts Expert Institute, said they could establish other aspects as well.

 

“We found that the red paint was made with red earth and madder root [Rubia tinctorum], which is found only in Arles in France, where Van Gogh painted late in life,” Sasiphan said.

 

7d675fc92a0d01d7cc06e8e5223a0d6e.jpeg

 

Haruthai also consulted with Associate Professor Pitiwat Somthai of Burapha University.

 

The scientists were unable to give Haruthai anything approaching a definitive answer as to the author of the painting, but her research has convinced her the painting is real and that it originated in 1888, at the peak of Van Gogh’s powers.

 

“We discovered that the original had many colours, but it’s faded to monochrome over the past century. And the pigments were those that Van Gogh used – all made with organic ingredients like red earth, madder root, grape wine and olive oil,” she said.

 

73566770d5272bb23e022640254fdbd8.jpeg

 

In Arles, in France’s Provence region where Haruthai believes Van Gogh painted this piece, she brought locally made paints to test scientifically and found them to match the pigments on her canvas.

 

Haruthai hopes that, regardless of whether she has a real Van Gogh or not, the research will provide a useful model in future, both for Thais and overseas scholars. 

 

“We’ll present our research to the Van Gogh Museum for approval and maybe they’ll exhibit the work. If it’s a genuine Van Gogh, of course, it won’t belong to me anymore, but to the world.”

 

606edff6eba52f7e53fbaf8ea966e8bc.jpeg

 

86750bac6f5ab8c835ff65bd50a3bf0d.jpeg

 

ce0e49b4cbb9b32e7385c7051b0b49db.jpeg

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/art/30346478

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-05-29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Media1 said:

You never know it maybe

Maybe, but I wouldn't count on it

 

I really doubt it's genuine, most of the time you hear of these things, it turns out it isn't real.

 

Except for the final episode of "Only Fools and Horses" that is...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, webfact said:

“We discovered that the original had many colours, but it’s faded to monochrome over the past century. And the pigments were those that Van Gogh used – all made with organic ingredients like red earth, madder root, grape wine and olive oil,” she said.

 

What is the significance of the photo in the OP that shows two paintings side by side?

 

c05dc4e9bbcc104298cde3a6515d62f7.jpeg&ke

 

Is the painting on the left the one owned by Haruthai, the painting that has "faded to monochrome over the past century", and the one on the right a a known genuine  painting of Van Gogh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listen to all these whining nay-sayers already calling that its a fake. Good greif so pathetic in their posts. Typical grumpy old men.

I hope for her sake that it is a genuine Van Gogh. Her life will be forever taken care of financially & remove the burdon from any farang having to support her & her parents & the sick bufalo! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there have been many cases of fake paintings of the old masters and even experts couldn't see that they were fake.

 

There are painters who can make a van Gogh from a quality that even the top-experts can't see  it's  fake. Several of those have been sold to museums.

 

Would be fun if this lady has a real one, you never know.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2018 at 6:36 PM, Puccini said:

 

What is the significance of the photo in the OP that shows two paintings side by side?

 

c05dc4e9bbcc104298cde3a6515d62f7.jpeg&ke

 

Is the painting on the left the one owned by Haruthai, the painting that has "faded to monochrome over the past century", and the one on the right a a known genuine  painting of Van Gogh?

2 copies, take your pick.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it turns out to be genuine will there be a loud cry of Ear Ear ?

Anyway if it is good luck to her. I don't understand the value placed on these paintings etc beautiful as they may be. I think most of the values are just investment risks by some who have more money than they know what to do with, and no, it's not jealousy it's entirely their choice.

Prefer something original and old in the engineering field like steam engines etc etc. Beam engines that you can see touch hear, now that's worth looking after, real history worth taking care of.

Edit.

I have one old relic at home I enjoy looking after but for Chr-ts sake don't tell her I said that.

Edited by overherebc
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, overherebc said:

If it turns out to be genuine will there be a loud cry of Ear Ear ?

Anyway if it is good luck to her. I don't understand the value placed on these paintings etc beautiful as they may be. I think most of the values are just investment risks by some who have more money than they know what to do with, and no, it's not jealousy it's entirely their choice.

Prefer something original and old in the engineering field like steam engines etc etc. Beam engines that you can see touch hear, now that's worth looking after, real history worth taking care of.

Edit.

I have one old relic at home I enjoy looking after but for Chr-ts sake don't tell her I said that.

Nope, I won't tell your oldtimer about it. I swear.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...