Jump to content

Going where no president has gone before, Trump wants Space Force by 2020


webfact

Recommended Posts

Going where no president has gone before, Trump wants Space Force by 2020

By Phil Stewart and Susan Heavey

 

2018-08-09T164709Z_1_LYNXMPEE781HB_RTROPTP_4_IRAN-NUCLEAR-SANCTIONS.JPG

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters after signing a proclamation declaring his intention to withdraw from the JCPOA Iran nuclear agreement in the Diplomatic Room at the White House in Washington, U.S. May 8, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration on Thursday announced an ambitious plan to usher in a new "Space Force" as the sixth branch of the military by 2020, but the proposal was scorned by opponents and may struggle to get liftoff in a divided Congress.

 

Trump has strongly championed the idea of creating a space-focused military service with the same stature as the Air Force and the Army, turning his dreams of a "Space Force" into a rallying cry for supporters at political events.

 

His 2020 reelection campaign sent a fundraising email on Thursday asking supporters to vote on their favourite Space Force logo for future Trump campaign merchandise, offering a choice of six.

 

U.S. Vice President Mike Pence, in an address at the Pentagon, described the Space Force as "an idea whose time has come."

 

"America will always seek peace in space, as on the Earth. But history proves that peace only comes through strength, and in the realm of outer space, the United States Space Force will be that strength in the years ahead," Pence said. He added that Congress must now act to establish and fund the department.

 

Trump tweeted: "Space Force all the way!"

 

The Space Force would be responsible for a range of crucial space-based U.S. military capabilities, which include everything from satellites enabling the Global Positioning System (GPS) to sensors that help track missile launches.

 

But critics view its creation as an unnecessary and expensive bureaucratic endeavour, a vanity project that simply strips away work already being done effectively by services like the Air Force.

 

Democratic Senator Brian Schatz, who is on the Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said the Space Force was a "dumb idea.""Although 'Space Force' won't happen, it's dangerous to have a leader who cannot be talked out of crazy ideas," Schatz said on Twitter.

 

MILITARIZING SPACE?

Democratic Senator Bill Nelson has said such a move would "rip the Air Force apart." Senator Bernie Sanders said via Twitter "maybe, just maybe" the government should guarantee healthcare "before we start spending billions to militarize outer space."

 

However, although Pentagon leaders, including U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, once opposed the idea of a Space Force, they lined up on Thursday to offer their support.

 

A Pentagon report released on Thursday included interim steps toward the creation of such an organization. A unified combatant command known as the U.S. Space Command would be formed by the end of 2018, according to a copy reviewed by Reuters.

 

In a nod to the Air Force's current role, the Pentagon report recommended that the Space Command be led initially by the commander of Air Force Space Command, who would be dual-hatted.

 

One of the arguments in favour of devoting more resources to a Space Force or Space Command is that American rivals like Russia and China appear increasingly ready to strike U.S. space-based capabilities in the event of a conflict.

 

"It is becoming a contested war fighting domain and we have to adapt to that reality," Mattis said.

 

The United States is a member of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which bars the stationing of weapons of mass destruction in space and only allows for the use of the moon and other celestial bodies for peaceful purposes.

 

Former astronaut and retired U.S. Navy Captain Mark Kelly on Thursday said that while Pence was right about the threats in outer space, the military was already handling them.

 

"There is a threat out there but it's being handled by the U.S. Air Force today. (It) doesn't make sense to build a whole other level of bureaucracy in an incredibly bureaucratic Department of Defense," Kelly told MSNBC.

 

(Additional reporting by Patricia Zengerle, Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Bill Trott and Rosalba O'Brien)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-08-10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Boon Mee said:

Of course it's a great idea! The only reason why the plan is criticized is that it's supported by Trump. 

Not necessarily.  

 

I don't like him, but the need to eventually protect assets in space will be a reality.   I just don't know about the extreme costs that are going into the military.   

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Of course it's a great idea! The only reason why the plan is criticized is that it's supported by Trump. 

 

The American public, Congress and the Pentagon generally believe that this is a BAD idea, and rue the day it popped into tRUmp's head. There no clearly defined mission, which is not currently covered by branches and commands within the military, and NASA.

 

So that leaves you, Mike Pence and tRUmp thinking this, and who knows whatever "this" is, is a good "idea".

 

Give him a parade, and pretend to form a "Space Force", give him a jacket/uniform and a model spaceship and he'll be happy.

 

 

Space Force: Trump 2020 asks supporters to vote on logo

 

Donald Trump's goal of creating a new military branch has yet to take off, but his campaign is hoping it will fill their coffers to infinity and beyond.

 

Trump 2020 re-election campaign manager Brad Parscale emailed supporters on Tuesday asking them to vote on a Space Force logo which will be sold later on.

 

The email came as Vice President Mike Pence appeared at the Pentagon to hail the proposed Space Force.

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45123606

 

 

 

_102904195_captuaf336re.jpg

Edited by mtls2005
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, 727Sky said:

As it stands now the Air Force, Navy, and even the Army all have their own activities in space. If a joint mission for all the services is (like a satellite launch) planed and desired it can take up to 10 years before the actual launch is approved due to all the inter service bureaucratic B.S.

 

Feel free to back this up with, say even the smallest shred of detail. And/or how the "Space Force" will address your perceived inadequacies?

 

24 minutes ago, 727Sky said:

The space force (joint command) is supposed to eliminate much of the infighting by establishing command and control and delegating authority to actually get stuff done with all the services working together instead of fighting individually for their own money .. 

 

The Pentagon has pushed back and mentioned that a joint command is a better solution. However, tRUmp wants what tRUmp wants, a "sixth branch of the military".

 

24 minutes ago, 727Sky said:

But do not let me rain on anyone's parade and their endeavors to make anything good seem bad as they truly know nothing about the subject.

 

Oh wise and sage oracle of the Space Force, please share your "wisdom". You do realize that people with a different opinion may actually "know something"?

 

 

24 minutes ago, 727Sky said:

But by all means carry on.

 

This is in the "news" today to deflect the latest news from the Tramp/Swump (Trump Swamp) (Manafort/Gates, Don Jr., Cohen, Wilbur Ross, Chris Collins).

 

 

DkM1-G1V4AAT1AP.jpg

Edited by mtls2005
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woudnt it be easier to fight any "space" enemy back on earth ? if someone starts blowing up US satellites etc, go and blow up their country. If you send the space army out there to fight, who are they fighting, there is nobody out there.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

Going where no president has gone before,

Wanna get filthy rich in light speed time? Join me to raise funds on the web for his one-way ticket to Saturn. All currencies and international government donations accepted. 

Edited by Lupatria
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

Woudnt it be easier to fight any "space" enemy back on earth ? if someone starts blowing up US satellites etc, go and blow up their country. If you send the space army out there to fight, who are they fighting, there is nobody out there.

 

Logical thoughts and statements like this will be drowned out by the Rally Klown's Krazy Krowds chanting "Space Force, Space Force, Space Force".

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Peterw42 said:

Woudnt it be easier to fight any "space" enemy back on earth ? if someone starts blowing up US satellites etc, go and blow up their country. If you send the space army out there to fight, who are they fighting, there is nobody out there.

 

That might be a difficult feat without satellites. 

Edited by bushdoctor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Of course it's a great idea! The only reason why the plan is criticized is that it's supported by Trump. 

Why is it a great idea? Orange Man doesn't really have a reputation of making peace anywhere in the world. It is basically him against the world at his moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand Trump has nominated James Tiberius Kirk for appointment as the SpaceAgency's director. I wonder what sort of immigration policies the Trump administration will mandate for  space--oh, wait, who would be the immigrants?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...