Jump to content

U.S. regains crown as most competitive economy for first time since 2008: WEF


webfact

Recommended Posts

U.S. regains crown as most competitive economy for first time since 2008: WEF

By Katanga Johnson

 

2018-10-16T230059Z_1_LYNXNPEE9F224_RTROPTP_4_ECONOMY-COMPETITIVENESS.JPG

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he delivers a speech during the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland January 26, 2018. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy sits atop of the World Economic Forum's annual global competitiveness survey for the first time since the 2007-2009 financial crisis, benefiting from a new ranking methodology this year, the Swiss body said on Tuesday.

 

In its closely-watched annual Global Competitiveness Report, the WEF said the U.S. is the country closest to the "frontier of competitiveness," an indicator that ranks competitive productivity using a scale from zero to 100.

 

The U.S. beat off Singapore, Germany, Switzerland and Japan, the other top four markets, with a score of 85.6 out of 100, the report said, due to its "vibrant" entrepreneurial culture and "strong" labor market and financial system.

 

The World Economic Forum, the same organization that runs the Davos meeting of global powerbrokers each January, bases its rankings of 140 economies on a dozen drivers of competitiveness, including a country's institutions and the policies that help drive productivity.

 

This year the WEF changed its methodology to better account for future readiness for competition, such as a country's idea generation, entrepreneurial culture, and the number of businesses that disrupt existing markets.

 

The last time the U.S. topped the list was 2008.

 

The WEF said it was too early to factor in how the Trump administration's recent trade policies would affect its ranking.

 

"While it is too early for the data to filter through in this year's report, we would expect trade tensions with China and other trading partners to have a negative impact on the US’ competitiveness in the future, were they to continue," Saadia Zahidi, the managing director at the World Economic Forum, said in an email.

 

"Open economies are more competitive."

 

(Reporting by Katanga Johnson; Editing by Michelle Price)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-10-17
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 hours ago, canuckamuck said:

They have nearly recovered from the previous administration.  They should be proud

From the OP...

 

The WEF said it was too early to factor in how the Trump administration's recent trade policies would affect its ranking.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The WEF officials who came up with this tripe are obviously dunderheads. How do you render this kind of judgement on a nation with the debt levels America has? Take away the dollar's reserve currency status, and all you've got left is a train wreck. The Chinese and Russians are working on that as we speak.

Competitive? Absolute BS. I can remember when the Australian steel industry ( unsubsidised ) was shipping cold rolled steel into the West Coast of America, all the way across the Pacific Ocean, at about $100 a tonne less than American steel mills could rail the stuff from Chicago. Don't get me started on the US automotive industry. It's been a basket case for decades.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

The WEF officials who came up with this tripe are obviously dunderheads. How do you render this kind of judgement on a nation with the debt levels America has? Take away the dollar's reserve currency status, and all you've got left is a train wreck. The Chinese and Russians are working on that as we speak.

Competitive? Absolute BS. I can remember when the Australian steel industry ( unsubsidised ) was shipping cold rolled steel into the West Coast of America, all the way across the Pacific Ocean, at about $100 a tonne less than American steel mills could rail the stuff from Chicago. Don't get me started on the US automotive industry. It's been a basket case for decades.

 

Care to comment on the Australian auto industry?  Pop's new American made Camry is tight as can be..20% less than they sell for here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, moontang said:

Care to comment on the Australian auto industry?  Pop's new American made Camry is tight as can be..20% less than they sell for here.

Since you ask, yes. The Australian auto industry was lunacy - 5 manufacturers trying to make a buck with a population of 20 million people. We might have scraped through with just one manufacturer, but Abbott and Hockey killed that off.

Your Pop's new Camry's quality is unconnected to American manufacturing practices. It's ironic that an American, W. Edwards Deming, taught the Japanese how to make quality products. The tightness of your Pop's Camry is due to the fact it's made to Japanese quality standards, not American or Australian.

If by here you mean Thailand, everyone knows the auto market is rigged.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, heybruce said:

Seriously?  This is the best evidence you have of greatness?

 

The only crying is in despair that so many people have been taken in by such a corrupt con man.

 

Wait until the next recession, which will hit and hit hard because Trump's massive deficit increases (increases during a strong economy, when deficits are supposed to go down) restrict fiscal responses and his alienation of allies will prevent a global coordinated response.  It could truly be a "Great" recession, or worse.

Last year you were struggling to get a visa..something about not wanting to bring it out of the US.  Now, you are talking deficits and doomsday. So what continent are you parking your money, assuming an illegal worker has it?  You really can't have it both ways.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, moontang said:

Last year you were struggling to get a visa..something about not wanting to bring it out of the US.  Now, you are talking deficits and doomsday. So what continent are you parking your money, assuming an illegal worker has it?  You really can't have it both ways.

What are you rambling about? 

 

Edited by heybruce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our Donald is following Hoover’s playbook with a sprinkling of treason and dictator worship you guys follow him if you like not me he is unamerican a cad and a traitor to boot and let’s not forget his favorites attacks on children insulting pows attacking gold star family’s stabbing allies in the guts tax breaks for the rich and trade wars that’s our Donald!!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, amdy2206 said:

A business (wo)man will always be good at running a country. They think about what is best, and not the protests which always abound. With a budiness (wo)man in charge, profits will be made and everyone will benefit - to the detriment of their compeditors , other countries. Look after your own first and do what has to be done to make your country great. Well done, Donald!

Let's take a look at the past US businessmen Presidents:

 

Andrew Johnson--placeholder president after Lincoln

Harry Truman--authorized use of atomic bomb, otherwise not noted for anything

George W. Bush--took a country at peace and with a budget surplus and left it in economic crisis with two unfinished wars and the largest by far deficit in US history.

 

History does not support your assumption.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""