Jump to content

SURVEY: USA -- Headed in the right or wrong direction?


Scott

SURVEY: USA -- Head in the right or wrong direction?  

267 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wwest5829 said:

will they seek office without being bought by “Citizens United” ( meaning the corporations that the SCOTUS ruled are citizens and can donated to politicians to do their bidding)

or a Soros funded candidate too right?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“We’ve turned it all around,” Trump said. “Once again, we are the economic envy of the entire world.”

 

No, you're not. A quarter with a "nice" GDP growth figure doesn't tell the story. GDP growth hit or surpassed 2 percent on a quarterly basis across more than a dozen quarters under Obama, and it surpassed 3 percent eight times. As the Washington Post’s Philip Bump points out, quarterly GDP growth has exceeded 5.1 percent in 37 months since Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, including four times under Obama. And: some exports were exceptionally strong, because China and other countries hit with sanctions and trade war taxes stocked up on stuff that was going to become more expensive. Thus, it's a "special occasion" boost. Also, how much weapons production (which has a prominent place in both GDP and jobs) can the US keep up with? There's a point where the country's own "defence" is saturated, and "allies" around the world have placed enough orders for non-flying F-35's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ahab said:

That, or they just do not like leftist policies that primary aim is making the USA look more like the EU. I'm going with don't like becoming the EU for $1000 Alex (Jeopardy Game Show reference). 

The US had always historically been like the EU. It is the UNITED States of America, just like the EU is the European UNION. I do agree that many "leftists," like me, would like to see the diminishing of nationalism and the rise of globalism. Many on the left, again like me, would also like to see a move from capitalism towards socialism. And yes, I know, many, especially those on the right, would not like to see that at all.

That is indeed several aspects of the widening, and unfortunately increasingly violence-prone, political gap between us. ????

  • Like 1
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, rskdev said:

I don't think Trump is going for the conventional war tactic. You know like Iraq and the rest of the middle east, or who has the biggest and best military, which is obviously the USA. No one can win that way. The smarter move is with economics and trade sanctions. That way it is non-confrontational. Be it, that he has a bigger plan in the end.

 

 

There is only one step between trade war and hot war...

images (2).jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mcambl61 said:

in what "historical" ways exactly?

From its very beginning, the US is a union of a number of disparate states, a republic, actually. The EU is a union of a number of disparate countries. They each have their own laws, but as part of the union, must comply with the laws of the higher authority: the federal government in the case of the US, and the European Commission in the case of the EU member countries.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, JAFO said:

 

 

  • Trump has done a few good things but his petty immature antics and his poor leadership skills have made the US a divisive hateful country. Hopefully the next President will do a better job.

Next president?

 

Trump wants to stay as long as his buddies Xi and Kim Jong Un are in charge in their respective countries!

 

He could become the new Roosevelt, with four terms, an economic depression and a major war under his belt!

 

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Brunolem said:

The US is already well into socialism with about half its population relying on government handouts.

 

It has not reached the European level yet, but why would anyone want to imitate Europe, which is desperately trying to cope with unmanageable issues?

 

 

I don't understand your last remark. Are you suggesting that Europe should not try to cope with their problems because they seem "unmanageable?"

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

or a Soros funded candidate too right?

If Mr. Soros really is funding all and everything that is being attributed to him, he would be penniless by now. Mr. Soros seems to be a symbol of liberalism that the extreme right wing (be it Hungary, Poland, Israel or the USA) consider dangerous. These are the people preaching nationalism and a "controlled democracy" ala Urban's Hungary (and I assume what President Trump aspires to). Why don't you refer to the casinos mogul Sheldon Adelson, financing the right wing? I wonder if Mr. Adelson realises that his buddies in the alt. right, which he has been financing, have been leading to the Pittsburgh massacre, directly or indirectly. This , as well as the pipe bombs, should be a lesson to all!

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:

complete nonsense. one was formed to throw off the tyranny of an oppressive kingdom, the other formed out of the sole purpose to combine economic power and centralise power into an unelected commission.

 

completely different things for completely different reasons.

 

the EU is regulating speech, that is just the beginning of the socialism you admire and they won't stop there. I know of no 1st amendment right in the EU.

 

fortunately the citizens of the US are not disarmed and that will ensure we do not have to put up with tyranny for too long. But then you want them disarmed to meet your socialist utopian dream don't you?

The reason behind their union might be different, but the idea behind a union is the same: to combine disparate strengths to make a more effective whole.

I don't know to what you're referring when you say "the EU is regulating speech." Even if that were true, regulating speech has nothing to do with socialism.

I am opposed to the 2nd Amendment as written, or at least as is currently interpreted. You can read my opinion on that at http://www.billsmart.com/writing/opinion/2nd_amendment/2nd_amendment.htm   . I will admit, however, that I have at times lately thought the prohibition imposed by the 2nd Amendment might indeed come in handy during Trump's administration.

Edited by billsmart
Inserted link...
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...