Jump to content

Canada approves Huawei extradition proceedings, China seethes


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Canada approves Huawei extradition proceedings, China seethes

By David Ljunggren

 

800x800.jpg

FILE PHOTO: Meng Wanzhou, Executive Board Director of the Chinese technology giant Huawei, attends a session of the VTB Capital Investment Forum "Russia Calling!" in Moscow, Russia October 2, 2014. REUTERS/Alexander Bibik/File Photo

 

OTTAWA (Reuters) - The Canadian government, as expected, on Friday approved extradition proceedings against the chief financial officer of Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, prompting a furious reaction from China.

 

Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Huawei's founder, was detained in Vancouver last December and is under house arrest.

In late January the U.S. Justice Department charged Meng and Huawei with conspiring to violate U.S. sanctions on Iran.

 

Meng will appear in a Vancouver court at 10 a.m. Pacific time (1800 GMT) on March 6, when a date will be set for her extradition hearing.

 

"Today, department of Justice Canada officials issued an authority to proceed, formally commencing an extradition process in the case of Ms. Meng Wanzhou," the government said in a statement.

 

China, whose relations with Canada have deteriorated badly over the affair, denounced the decision and repeated previous demands for Meng's release.

 

Legal experts had predicted the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau would give the go-ahead for extradition proceedings, given the close judicial relationship between Canada and the United States.

 

It could be years though before Meng is ever sent to the United States, since Canada's slow-moving justice system allows many decisions to be appealed.

 

A final decision will likely come down to the federal justice minister, who will face the choice of angering the United States by rejecting the extradition bid, or China by accepting it.

 

Professor Wesley Wark of the University of Ottawa's Graduate School of Public and International Affairs said "the Canadians will take a beating throughout this whole process" from China.

 

"I suspect the Trudeau government is desperately hoping that the Americans reach a deal with the Chinese," he said by phone.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters in December he would intervene if it served national security interests or helped close a trade deal with China, prompting Ottawa to stress the extradition process should not be politicized. Last week Trump played down the idea of dropping the charges.

 

After Meng's detention, China arrested two Canadians on national security grounds, and a Chinese court later sentenced to death a Canadian man who previously had only been jailed for drug smuggling.

 

Brock University professor Charles Burton, a former Canadian diplomat who had served two postings in China, said Beijing was likely to retaliate further.

 

"They're not going to take this lying down ... one shudders to think what the consequences could be," he told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp, saying Beijing might crack down on Canadian canola shipments or stop Chinese students from going to Canada.

 

Ottawa rejects Chinese calls to release Meng, saying it cannot interfere with the judiciary.

 

"The Chinese side is utterly dissatisfied with and firmly opposes the issuance of (the) authority to proceed," the embassy in Ottawa said in a statement.

 

Beijing had earlier questioned the state of judicial independence in Canada, noting the government faces accusations it had tried to intervene to stop a corruption trial.

 

Canadian Justice Minister David Lametti declined to comment.

 

Huawei was not immediately available for comment.

 

Meng's lawyers said they were disappointed and described the U.S. charges as politically motivated.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-03-02

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, rooster59 said:

It could be years though before Meng is ever sent to the United States, since Canada's slow-moving justice system allows many decisions to be appealed.

doesnt matter, in the eyes of the usa their goal has been accomplished

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rooster59 said:

U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters in December he would intervene if it served national security interests or helped close a trade deal with China

It depends on whether Trump can benefit personally with Canada.

Trump Tower in Vancouver and no property taxes for 20 years?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SammyT said:

Imagine how quiet and push-free airports and hotel lobbies would be in Canada if the Chinese decided to take their tourism elsewhere... 

It Would be Perfect, Not to see chinese tourists and enjoy visit Banff, Lake Louise and Whistler 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rooster59 said:

U.S. President Donald Trump told Reuters in December he would intervene if it served national security interests or helped close a trade deal with China,

He is determined to go to jail for obstructing justice somehow, some way.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Beijing government will sacrifice her and continue to do what is necessary

to regain the country's former status as the super power of Asia.  

She might have to rot in jail and join the one million soldiers that died in the Korean war. 

One of Chairman Mao's son also died in the war.        

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

 

You would have to be nuts to go to anywhere in China now if you are from Canada or American. 

 

Doubt much issues for tourists. Those on business, or previously holding government positions maybe a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, car720 said:

There is much, much more to this than the average joe understands.

If she had simply been charged with spying, which is what the US is really saying no matter how they couch it, then the whole thing would have been over by now.  To say that this is not political is an absolute lie.

 

Coming from an average joe, that's a bit of dodgy bit of reasoning.

This reason she isn't charged with "spying" is that it's not quite what this is about. That her firm also does that (as in industrial espionage), is a different issue. Curious how this would have been "over by now" if she was, indeed, "charged with spying"? And was there actually anything serious said about this not being "political"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Morch said:

And was there actually anything serious said about this not being "political"?

I believe the Canadian Prime Minister and several of his cronies, as well as the Canadian judiciary, have said on many occasions that it is not political.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Morch said:

That her firm also does that (as in industrial espionage), is a different issue.

She is only a director of the company and as such has fiduciary duties.  Said duties form the basis of her arrest.  If not for her actions on behalf of the company then she wouldn't be arrested.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tlandtday said:

rather interesting to see one of the "untouchables" in China actually be prosecuted for something...

55555... she is more than a few rungs below the top of the ladder and nowhere near untouchable in the Chinese pantheon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SoonOh said:

It Would be Perfect, Not to see chinese tourists and enjoy visit Banff, Lake Louise and Whistler 

Interesting, considering that Canada, especially Toronto, has the largest number of Chinese residents outside of mainland China.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...