snoop1130 Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 Michelle Williams left ‘paralysed’ after co-star Mark Wahlberg was paid $1.5 million compared to her $1,000 by Rebecca Lewis Michelle was left ‘paralyzed by feeling of futility’ (Picture: Getty) Michelle Williams has revealed that she was left ‘paralysed’ after discovering how little she was paid compared to Mark Wahlberg for All The Money In The World reshoots. Speaking with members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus to mark Equal Pay Day on 2 April, the Oscar-winning actress said she was ‘paralysed in feelings of futility’ after discovering she was paid $1,000 (£739) compared to Mark’s $1.5 million (£1.1 million). ‘In late 2017, the news broke that I’d been paid less than $1,000 compared to the $1.5 million that my male counterpart had received for the exact same amount of work,’ she said. ‘And guess what, no one cared. Full Story: https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/03/michelle-williams-left-paralyzed-discovering-pay-gap-co-star-mark-wahlberg-9100038/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ThomasThBKK Posted April 3, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 3, 2019 Guess what, why the hell do u even take a job for 1000, learn to negotiate yourself.... 4 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcharacters Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, ThomasThBKK said: Guess what, why the hell do u even take a job for 1000, learn to negotiate yourself.... I'm guessing if the blew off doing the required reshooting her chances of working again in the film industry would approach zero. Directors would likely keep her at arms distance. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexRich Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 I think I read somewhere her father is a rich guy, through investments? I’d have thought that her and her agent were savvy enough to negotiate a decent payment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post KittenKong Posted April 3, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 3, 2019 With a face like that I'm surprised they paid her so much. Or is it a horror film? 2 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendejo Posted April 3, 2019 Share Posted April 3, 2019 (edited) Perhaps Marky engaged in, umm, intimate encounters with the right people. I always figured his talents lie off-screen. He even bragged that he got a certain movie role because of the size of his, err, roll. She is actually a fair actress, perhaps she was silly enough to think that success in show biz is based on merit. But yeah, she needs a better agent. from the metro article: When the news broke, Mark donated the fee to the Time’s Up Legal Defense Fund in Michelle’s name. Alongside this pledge, WME – who represented both Michelle and Mark – also donated $500,000 (£379,000) to the same cause. what crap! Edited April 3, 2019 by bendejo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post quandow Posted April 3, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 3, 2019 Michelle who? Maybe that's why. 4 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Emdog Posted April 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 4, 2019 She needed a better agent. I think we could all agree on that 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacuum Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Stop whining and get a real job. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulic Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Old news and Mark Wahlberg donated the 1.5 million to some women's group charity. Up to him I suppose. As for her I have no respect. The first thing she should have done is fire her agent for incompetence and contacted Whalberg's agent for representation. Then move forward from there 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Croc Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Best know perhaps as a long term partner of Heath Ledger, with whom she had a daughter. She once played Marilyn Munroe in a film and has appeared in Baywatch. Her changed appearance over the years has probably contributed to her lower salaries. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Berkshire Posted April 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 4, 2019 5 hours ago, quandow said: Michelle who? Maybe that's why. Yeah, this is not a good example of unequal pay between men and women because it's more about star power. I'm sure Jennifer Lawrence gets paid more than some unknown guy doing the same work on her films. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Berkshire Posted April 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 4, 2019 12 hours ago, KittenKong said: With a face like that I'm surprised they paid her so much. Or is it a horror film? "With a face like that......" Seriously? She may not be a super hottie at her age, but she certainly is not ugly. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 PMT and being short changed can be a lethal combo leading to fictitious paralysis ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post UnkleGoooose Posted April 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 4, 2019 17 hours ago, snoop1130 said: ‘And guess what, no one cared. And nobody does still. There are robust systems in place to ensure that people get paid exactly what is fair regardless of gender, race etc. They are called market forces. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticky Wicket Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 2 hours ago, Berkshire said: "With a face like that......" Seriously? She may not be a super hottie at her age, but she certainly is not ugly. She's really attractive, it's just those glasses aren't doing her any favours whatsoever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Listen up, the world ain't fair. To some $1,000 would be a fortune. Anyway, who is she, has she been a lead actor in a film, does she get people paying to see movies because of her? I don't particularly like Wahlberg after the Ted films, but I'm sure loads of people go to see his movies. This is just some woman moaning that she should be paid more because ( enter own reason/s ). If she wanted equal pay to men, go nursing or suchlike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacovl46 Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 Well, I'm sure the fact that Wahlberg is a much bigger star than she is has absolutely nothing to do with the difference in pay! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgMech Cowboy Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 I know who Mark is. Who is Michelle Williams? Mark might get me to the movie, but she sure won't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KittenKong Posted April 4, 2019 Share Posted April 4, 2019 7 hours ago, Berkshire said: "With a face like that......" Seriously? She may not be a super hottie at her age, but she certainly is not ugly. I'll take your word for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now