Jump to content

Bangkok Bank, British Embassy ink MoU granting visa privileges for cardholders


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Classic Ray said:

Shame the Ambassador can’t devote a bit more time to the interests of British citizens who live here and have and still do pay UK taxes, which pay his salary.

 

All the nonsense about income statements could easily have been sorted out if there was any will to provide service for citizens.  There isn’t, they prefer just to share extra fees from encouraging the Thai elite to visit the UK. With luck they will get the chance to see Yingluck and Thaksin while they are there!

Yep ok to go schmooze with officials, but don't  bother to help with retirement letters--that means work!

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, colinneil said:

Davidson can sign all the MOUs he wants, he has got nothing to do with visas being granted.

Just hot air and a publicity stunt.

Hot air?  From whom? You?

Neither the OP, nor Mr Davidson, said that he had anything to do with granting visas.

Edited by Just Weird
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

Hot air?  From whom? You?

Neither the OP, nor Mr Davidson, said that he had anything to do with granting visas.

Only a fool would attempt to say applying for a visa ( as the article covered) was not connected with having a visa granted.

Edited by geoffbezoz
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrTuner said:

So VFS will give you tea & cookies while you sit in their "VIP" waiting room and then your documents get put into the same pile as the rest of them?

No, that's not the case.

From the very clear, easily understood OP...

"...without having to provide evidence of their financial status or other documents".

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

No, that's not the case.

From the very clear, easily understood OP...

"...without having to provide evidence of their financial status or other documents".

Oh I understood easily: 'aimed to enable their cardholders'

 

Lots of aiming but no shooting.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Boris already flogging visa to finance his Brexit shenanigans?

 

Seriously though, I think it's not a bad move. Those Thais who qualify for that particular credit card are big spenders and should easily qualify for visa to all countries, including the UK. Assuming that they haven't been bad, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Classic Ray said:

Shame the Ambassador can’t devote a bit more time to the interests of British citizens who live here and have and still do pay UK taxes, which pay his salary.

 

All the nonsense about income statements could easily have been sorted out if there was any will to provide service for citizens.  There isn’t, they prefer just to share extra fees from encouraging the Thai elite to visit the UK. With luck they will get the chance to see Yingluck and Thaksin while they are there!

Quite correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Oziex1 said:

Thailand, the hub of MoU's. 

Any Thai with 10 million credit status will not give 2 sh/ts for this service, the 10 million gets them what they want anywhere and any when 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2019 at 3:23 PM, Khunbilly said:

They had me right up until "Bt10 million with the bank"!  ????

Yes, 200 million would have been better. Much surer way to keep out the riff raff.

 

Mind you , Prayuth sold land worth more than that recently so maybe 800 million would be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2019 at 2:52 PM, colinneil said:

Davidson can sign all the MOUs he wants, he has got nothing to do with visas being granted.

Just hot air and a publicity stunt.

I doubt very seriously if someone with 10million in Thai assets will have a problem getting a visa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2019 at 6:59 PM, Just Weird said:

Hot air?  From whom? You?

Neither the OP, nor Mr Davidson, said that he had anything to do with granting visas.

 

Actually he's right, technically. VFS is an outsourced supplier to the British Home Office. Davidson works for the Foreign Office. Any changes to the contract with VFS will be managed by the Home Office. I'm not sure the HO will allow local staff to do this rather than central as that could lead to contract performance issues.

 

This is however wrong on many other points. The UK has very clear strict law and policies regarding fair competition, fair treatment, tendering etc etc. Even more so on public sector commerce. There have been many issues around these under the Cameron and May governments. Britain also tightened its anti Bribery legislation. So 

 

Why is only on bank being favored? Who decided this is acceptable and at what level? Is that allowed according to commercial rules?

 

There is a "fee" of ThB 4k. Who is having this? How are VFS costs verified and covered? Is there any cost or benefit to the British Taxpayer? How is this being accounted for?

 

This is clearly suggesting a privileged few, wealthy Thais, who use one, and only one commercial private company bank, and who meet that bank's criteria, and are willing to pay a fee, can be treated on a VIP basis when applying for a UK visa. This expressly says including use of a VIP lounge and being able to queue jump. Implicit is the idea that anyone using this will have the visa application processed more quickly and more favorably. To think it doesn't imply this is naive at best.

 

The recent Tory government seem to equate all value of people and all judgement of people to their wealth so it might well fit with their thinking. But it is not in tune with the business and commercial rules they espouse.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, moe666 said:

I doubt very seriously if someone with 10million in Thai assets will have a problem getting a visa 

 

Probably true. But their wealth and choice of particular bank shouldn't mean they can jump the queue and be treated better than others.

 

VFS offer an express service for UAE visas. UDS 20 gets you a 2 -3 day turnround and use of special email for any questions, document requests etc. All done on-line, very efficient.

 

Any express service should be reasonable cost, and not open to just a select few, from one nationality and one commercial bank!

 

This deal smells bad for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Actually he's right, technically. VFS is an outsourced supplier to the British Home Office. Davidson works for the Foreign Office. Any changes to the contract with VFS will be managed by the Home Office. I'm not sure the HO will allow local staff to do this rather than central as that could lead to contract performance issues.

 

This is however wrong on many other points. The UK has very clear strict law and policies regarding fair competition, fair treatment, tendering etc etc. Even more so on public sector commerce. There have been many issues around these under the Cameron and May governments. Britain also tightened its anti Bribery legislation. So 

 

Why is only on bank being favored? Who decided this is acceptable and at what level? Is that allowed according to commercial rules?

 

There is a "fee" of ThB 4k. Who is having this? How are VFS costs verified and covered? Is there any cost or benefit to the British Taxpayer? How is this being accounted for?

 

This is clearly suggesting a privileged few, wealthy Thais, who use one, and only one commercial private company bank, and who meet that bank's criteria, and are willing to pay a fee, can be treated on a VIP basis when applying for a UK visa. This expressly says including use of a VIP lounge and being able to queue jump. Implicit is the idea that anyone using this will have the visa application processed more quickly and more favorably. To think it doesn't imply this is naive at best.

"Actually he's right, technically".

Actually, he's not, neither Davidson nor anyone else mad claims that he would be making, or changing, visa decisions, this is just a privilege that having the card allows, one of them being not having to provide so much documentation, presumably because the applicants have already been vetted financially.

 

"The UK has very clear strict law and policies regarding fair competition, fair treatment, tendering etc..."

So what?  Applying for a visa is not putting anyone in competition with anyone else!  How is this privilege "unfair" for anyone?  Tendering?  What's tendering got to do with visa applications?

 

"This is clearly suggesting a privileged few, wealthy Thais, who use one, and only one commercial private company bank..."

This is for anyone who has the card and a benefit of having a card that has required them to prove their financial status already is simply being applied to the financial requirements of the Home Office!   That the UK's representative here works for the Foreign Office is beside the point.

 

"Why is only on bank being favored?"

Perhaps other banks (your suggestion that BBL is a private bank available only to the select few is wrong) couldn't meet the UK's requirements, perhaps they had no interest in being involved, who knows?  What does it matter, though, unless you're suggesting that the Home Office and BBL are involved in corrupt practices?  I'd like to see you back that one up if that is your assertion!

 

"This expressly says including use of a VIP lounge and being able to queue jump".

The queue jumping facility is there already for anyone who wants to take advantage of it.

 

" Implicit is the idea that anyone using this will have the visa application processed more quickly and more favorably"

A more favourable decision is not implicit, that's just your view of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2019 at 8:00 PM, mercman24 said:

anyone with 10 million in this country needs their head read.

Especially as there is now a guarantee of only 5m should the bank get into financial trouble. Next year it will go down to 1million , so you would be even more stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, wgdanson said:

Sorry to be thick....what's an MOU please?

Memorandum of understanding. Otherwise also known as "Yeah sure, why not, if it pleases you". Usually doesn't bind the parties to anything.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...