Jump to content

Britain searches for post-Brexit trading opportunities in South East Asia


webfact

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, tomacht8 said:

Johnson, come the circus, come the clown. 

 

As I repeatedly caution Brexiteers, don't mistake Johnson's words for his actions, he'll do whatever is best for Johnson. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MobileContent said:

A free trade agreement brings the UK nothing even after Brexit because the UK has nothing to offer more except a service industry and the finance sector

Exactly. And that's currently the sector other countries usually don't want to open. In the deals negotiated by the EU, it has been the most difficult part to get accepted by partner countries. The EU needed a lot of pressure and time to get them to open their service sector. The EU is currently the first exporter of services.

"In 2017, the EU exports of services to non-member countries increased to EUR 912 billion with United Kingdom recording the highest value (EUR 185 billion).

In 2017, the EU imports of services from non-member countries increased to EUR 721 billion with Germany recording the highest value (EUR 136 billion)."

 

Edited by candide
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess Britain's FS doesn't realize that their pensioner expats are bailing from Thailand due to the shrinking value of the GBP and very strong baht, so importing British goods won't be necessary. Perhaps he should focus only on the other 9 nations planned for this trip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

I guess he's referring to the Brexiter dislike for the EU doing deals which all member states benefit from and use; and that member states cannot do deals independently.

 

Brexiters believe the UK on it's own will be able to negotiation better trade deals with non EU nations than the EU does.

 

The fantastic success in negotiating Brexit is testimony to the skill, competence and effectiveness of Tory negotiators!

 

No doubt Tories and their cronies will do well personally out of any deals. 

I guess he's referring to the Brexiter dislike for the EU doing deals which all member states benefit from and use;

 

So why does the EU (and to be fair, the UK) govts. have such an allergy to coming up with a UK/EU trade deal?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

As has been explained repeatedly, the EU doesn't want to give the UK a deal which gives it too many benefits for too little in return. There are other European countries that have struck deals with the EU. But the UK rejects those models. 

Fair enough, to a small extent - but the EU/UK govts. for some obscure (????) reason haven't even started negotiating a trade deal!

 

Surely something that is most important to everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dick dasterdly said:

Fair enough, to a small extent - but the EU/UK govts. for some obscure (????) reason haven't even started negotiating a trade deal!

 

Surely something that is most important to everyone.

Well, the EU has always been very clear about its red lines. And has stuck to them. For some reason, Teresa May et alii just refused to believe them. I remember before the referendum when it was commonly believed by Brexiters that, for example, Germany would fold because of its car exports. As if Germany could fold on its own. But there is this persistent belief among most Brexiters that Germany pulls the strings in the EU.

What Germany does is simply veto changes in EU rules and laws that it doesn't approve of. This kind of power is not peculiar to Germany but shared by all member nations.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:

So why does the EU (and to be fair, the UK) govts. have such an allergy to coming up with a UK/EU trade deal?

Because if the UK leaves, the EU will be finished (no money).

They either frighten us into staying, or are effectively committing suicide.

 

It's like your Thai gf threatening to jump off the balcony if you don't stay with her.

She sees no other option.

 

To be fair I understand the EUs POV, I wouldn't let the UK leave either.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Like 1
  • Confused 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baerboxer said:

 

I guess he's referring to the Brexiter dislike for the EU doing deals which all member states benefit from and use; and that member states cannot do deals independently.

 

Brexiters believe the UK on it's own will be able to negotiation better trade deals with non EU nations than the EU does.

 

The fantastic success in negotiating Brexit is testimony to the skill, competence and effectiveness of Tory negotiators!

 

No doubt Tories and their cronies will do well personally out of any deals. 

Guess again Bro. Seems you and Chomps have the same comprehension issue. I was stating that the UK can't do deals with non EU countries until we've left the EU.

 

Disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

As has been explained repeatedly, the EU doesn't want to give the UK a deal which gives it too many benefits for too little in return. There are other European countries that have struck deals with the EU. But the UK rejects those models. 

Exactly. The EU prefers deals where it gets all the benefits and gives NOTHING in return. The Withdrawal agreement is an excellent example. 39 Billion for nothing. 

 

Unfortunately for them the soft touch Theresa has gone. Hope they had a good laugh and a few bottles of champagne after she had left the room having agreed to the surrender treaty because that party is well and truly over and the hangover is setting in. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today the Home Secretary has pledged another 2.1 billion pounds to prepare for a no-deal Brexit.  That on top of the 4 billion plus pounds already being spent.  This is to recruit hundreds of customs and border staff.  Apart from the fact that it is impossible to find, recruit and then train the staff by the end of October, why are we doing this?  According to Johnson it is a million to one that Britain will leave the EU with no deal.  If he is right and we do have a deal then all these new employees will be surplus to requirements.  Not to mention the 2.1 billion pounds we will have p*ssed away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, dunroaming said:

Today the Home Secretary has pledged another 2.1 billion pounds to prepare for a no-deal Brexit.  That on top of the 4 billion plus pounds already being spent.  This is to recruit hundreds of customs and border staff.  Apart from the fact that it is impossible to find, recruit and then train the staff by the end of October, why are we doing this?  According to Johnson it is a million to one that Britain will leave the EU with no deal.  If he is right and we do have a deal then all these new employees will be surplus to requirements.  Not to mention the 2.1 billion pounds we will have p*ssed away.

Even if you have a deal, the UK will need extra Customs staff - unless you stay in the Customs Union. A Free Trade Agreement doesn’t imply free circulation of goods, so more checks are unavoidable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

Exactly. The EU prefers deals where it gets all the benefits and gives NOTHING in return. The Withdrawal agreement is an excellent example. 39 Billion for nothing. 

Snip

This has already been explained here 1000 times

 

The “divorce bill” was agreed upon together by both the UK and the EU as part of the withdrawal agreement negotiations, and the latest estimates suggest it will be just under £40 billion . It covers the UK’s outstanding financial commitments and liabilities to the EU, including annual contributions to the EU budget up to 2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, damascase said:

Even if you have a deal, the UK will need extra Customs staff - unless you stay in the Customs Union. A Free Trade Agreement doesn’t imply free circulation of goods, so more checks are unavoidable.

I should clarify that it is now announced that some of that 2.1 billion is to stockpile medicine as well.  Something Johnson and his boys dismissed as project fear.

 

Part of the original 4 billion pounds from Hammond was to strengthen the border forces and customs officials and that was in anticipation of a deal being agreed.  This money is specifically for a no-deal scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has already been explained here 1000 times
 
The “divorce bill” was agreed upon together by both the UK and the EU as part of the withdrawal agreement negotiations, and the latest estimates suggest it will be just under £40 billion . It covers the UK’s outstanding financial commitments and liabilities to the EU, including annual contributions to the EU budget up to 2020

1001 times:
Your Merkel/May Surrender Treaty was not agreed by Parliament, three times. You have no WAG, the one which tried to trick us into 39 Bn
We owe nowt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has already been explained here 1000 times
 
The “divorce bill” was agreed upon together by both the UK and the EU as part of the withdrawal agreement negotiations, and the latest estimates suggest it will be just under £40 billion . It covers the UK’s outstanding financial commitments and liabilities to the EU, including annual contributions to the EU budget up to 2020

1001 times:
Your Merkel/May Surrender Treaty was not agreed by Parliament, three times. You have no WAG, the one which tried to trick us into 39 Bn
We owe nowt.
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...