External testicles proves ‘unintelligent design’

A new campaign against Creationism by athiests is focusing on glaring faults in the construction of the human body, particularly the idea to put the male’s testes on the outside.

‘The religious right are always harping on about so-called ‘Intelligent Design’ but both the irrational and rational response has to be ‘<deleted>’,’ said anti- creationism campaigner Sean Duff. ‘Why would anyone intelligent put something as sensitive as testicles in a little sack on the outside? Surely this proves the concept of ‘Unintelligent Design’?

Duff launched his campaign by turning up to a Christian festival in Southampton, handing out full colour leaflets featuring the parts of the human body that proved the stupid design theory. A number of elderly churchgoers were seen holding the pictures upside down to try and make out what was illustrated.

‘What great master plan had hair falling out of your head, but starting to grow hair out of your ears at the same time? What’s so intelligent about blackheads, or dandruff, or vaginal discharges? And as for hair in your bum crack, well I can’t think of anywhere else you’d would want it less.’

This unexpected speech rather mis-judged the mood of the Good News Senior Christians Festival and Mr Duff was asked to leave. When he refused a couple of police officers took him outside, and using a knee, vigorously reinforced Duff’s point about the poor choice of location for the male testes.

Posted: 10 January 2007 by Team Biscuit

I've often thought this myself. When god (if there is such a thing) made woman, he used the right tools, and tucked all the gooey bits out of sight. I think that by the time he got round to man he had a handful of goo left so stuck it on the front.

(I am aware that this is completely out of sequence in biblical timelines by the way)

Men are always always always without exception, much more attractive with some sort of genital covering on

I think that by the time he got round to man he had a handful of goo left so stuck it on the front.

under conditions of normal usage testicles should not be "gooey" , well not very gooey.

what are you doing with yours , or those that you have access to , that keeps them gooey.

I've often thought this myself. When god (if there is such a thing) made woman, he used the right tools, and tucked all the gooey bits out of sight. I think that by the time he got round to man he had a handful of goo left so stuck it on the front.

(I am aware that this is completely out of sequence in biblical timelines by the way)

Men are always always always without exception, much more attractive with some sort of genital covering on

I disagree.The male bits should be 'loud and proud'...easy to scratch and just as easy to 'show off'.Plus we have the advantage of being able to 'whip it out' for a quick pee or a 'how's your father'etc, without having to disrobe.....

I've often thought this myself. When god (if there is such a thing) made woman, he used the right tools, and tucked all the gooey bits out of sight. I think that by the time he got round to man he had a handful of goo left so stuck it on the front.

(I am aware that this is completely out of sequence in biblical timelines by the way)

Men are always always always without exception, much more attractive with some sort of genital covering on

I disagree.The male bits should be 'loud and proud'...easy to scratch and just as easy to 'show off'.Plus we have the advantage of being able to 'whip it out' for a quick pee or a 'how's your father'etc, without having to disrobe.....

or for the kiwis to jump the unsuspecting sheep

Are you talking about feathered flightless birds having sex with sheep or are you projecting bloncs......

Chucky, do I have to explain to EWE?

the flightless bird and the armless sheep and the horny KIWI, what is the result.

I've often thought this myself. When god (if there is such a thing) made woman, he used the right tools, and tucked all the gooey bits out of sight. I think that by the time he got round to man he had a handful of goo left so stuck it on the front.

(I am aware that this is completely out of sequence in biblical timelines by the way)

Men are always always always without exception, much more attractive with some sort of genital covering on

I disagree.The male bits should be 'loud and proud'...easy to scratch and just as easy to 'show off'.Plus we have the advantage of being able to 'whip it out' for a quick pee or a 'how's your father'etc, without having to disrobe.....

I like my testicles, the fact that I can look down and still see them, without the aid of a mirror, is a bonus.

This unexpected speech rather mis-judged the mood of the Good News Senior Christians Festival and Mr Duff was asked to leave.

If the testicles are inside (as in , undescended testicles, a birth 'defect' that needs to be corrected), the body is too hot and the sperm dies. But when you're really cold, they automatically get close to the warmth. Marvelous design, I suppose.

Oh, wait - this is bedlam. Am I being too serious?

Is it true that master martial arts practitioners can retract their nads? mr Man is convinced that Bruce Lee had mastered it.

Is it true that master martial arts practitioners can retract their nads? mr Man is convinced that Bruce Lee had mastered it.

Many styles of Karate used to teach how to "retract" your nads up into the crotch (using muscle control). That way of you get kicked in the groin it wouldn't hurt as much (I found that avoiding getting kicked in the groin is much easier, less painful and doesn't require as much practise !)

As for "unintelligent" design. If we were designed "intelligently", why does pretty much every creature on earth have to take a dump and/or a whiz now and then ?

An intelligent design would see a biological system that only consumed what it needed, leaving no "waste" product that had to be disposed of.

As for "unintelligent" design. If we were designed "intelligently", why does pretty much every creature on earth have to take a dump and/or a whiz now and then ?

the whiz and dumps serve useful function as natural fertilizers for plants.

As for "unintelligent" design. If we were designed "intelligently", why does pretty much every creature on earth have to take a dump and/or a whiz now and then ?

the whiz and dumps serve useful function as natural fertilizers for plants.

But wouldn't an "intelligent" design see creations that didn't require the waste products from creature's bums in order to be fertilized ? It seems like a messy, smelly way to do things.

I really want to renname this thread "Christian <deleted>!" but discretion has got the better part of valour.

Most non-mammals have internal gonads, as do many mammals. So temperature control alone is not the reason for that sack of dangly bits. Looks more like a hernia evolved to be permanent.

It is interesting that most creationists have differing views from each other over what constitutes their "Scientific Theory". There is "Old Earth Creationism", "New Earth", "Neo", "Theistic" and more, plus multiple sub-species of each. This in itself seems to prove the "Theory" of evolution.

Put a group together and they will be just as likely to argue with each other as they would with Darwin or, my personal hero, Dawkins.

I really want to renname this thread "Christian <deleted>!" but discretion has got the better part of valour.

Most non-mammals have internal gonads, as do many mammals. So temperature control alone is not the reason for that sack of dangly bits. Looks more like a hernia evolved to be permanent.

It is interesting that most creationists have differing views from each other over what constitutes their "Scientific Theory". There is "Old Earth Creationism", "New Earth", "Neo", "Theistic" and more, plus multiple sub-species of each. This in itself seems to prove the "Theory" of evolution.

Put a group together and they will be just as likely to argue with each other as they would with Darwin or, my personal hero, Dawkins.

I'd like to admire Dawkins but he makes your average evangelist look demure. I can't abide shrieking fundamentalists whatever they believe.

Intelligent design and a loving god. Creates life that has to consume other life in order to continue. 555 . A bit like a family get together.