U.S. Democrats urge new probe of Kavanaugh, impeachment inquiry

[chokrai]

At this point the NYT are just the propaganda arm of the Democrat party. Constant lying and selective editing. The Lefties just suck it in over and over. Useful idiots.

[Chomper Higgot]

8 minutes ago, chokrai said:

At this point the NYT are just the propaganda arm of the Democrat party. Constant lying and selective editing. The Lefties just suck it in over and over. Useful idiots.

Ah, the none denial denial raises its head again.

 

 

Kavanaugh will be subjected to a full investigation and impeachment based upon his past behaviour and perjury, the only question is when. 

[PhonThong]

20 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You are confusing Kavanaugh’s hearing with the DoJ investigation into complaints of criminality leveled at Kavanaugh.

 

Please excuse those of us who do not join you in your confusion:

 

https://www.gq.com/story/kavanaugh-investigation-sham

 

Well, I am not confused. Confirmations are controlled by the Senate. The Republicans control the Senate. What other outcome were you looking for?

[Chomper Higgot]

6 minutes ago, PhonThong said:

Well, I am not confused. Confirmations are controlled by the Senate. The Republicans control the Senate. What other outcome were you looking for?

Criminal allegations against Kavanaugh were laid before the Senate and handed off to the DoJ, the WH used the DoJ prerogative to limit the investigation scope and excluding numerous witnesses against Kavanaugh. 

 

The outcome was rigged. 

 

The folly of which was to believe that was the end of the matter.

 

 

[xylophone]

47 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Kavanagh clearly lied in his confirmation hearing. Not OK for a SCOTUS justice. He has dirtied the court.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Seems like the serial liar in the WH likes to surround himself with other liars and those of dubious character. 

 

He obviously feels at home amongst them!

[Sir Swagman]

3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Will these Witch Hunts ever end? 

Reliable as ever.....

This is the highest court in the land. Is it not deserving of being occupied by persons of the highest moral and personal standards available? The sham investigation, orchestrated by the White House, into this man deserves a revisit at the very least.

[blazes]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You are confusing Kavanaugh’s hearing with the DoJ investigation into complaints of criminality leveled at Kavanaugh.

 

Please excuse those of us who do not join you in your confusion:

 

https://www.gq.com/story/kavanaugh-investigation-sham

 

Nice to see you're not confused for once, Chomper

[Jingthing]

Can't wait until the next Trump nominated Supreme Court Justice is sworn in.

Hopefully never.

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

[chokrai]

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Ah, the none denial denial raises its head again.

 

 

Kavanaugh will be subjected to a full investigation and impeachment based upon his past behaviour and perjury, the only question is when. 

Will that be before or after they impeach Trump for colluding with the Russians?

[Chomper Higgot]

11 minutes ago, chokrai said:

Will that be before or after they impeach Trump for colluding with the Russians?

Trump’s impeachment is underway, Lewandowski’s disastrous attempt yesterday at being smart before Congress just nudged it along a step.

[Jingthing]

Will that be before or after they impeach Trump for colluding with the Russians?

Do you think treason is the only potential impeachable offense?

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

[chokrai]

7 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Do you think treason is the only potential impeachable offense?

Sent from my Lenovo A7020a48 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Well the Dems have another 5 years to find one. They are useless at anything else so might as well try.

[allen303]

2 hours ago, seajae said:

its all hearsay and the fact that the so called woman has no recollection of it happening( a fact the paper left out of their story) doesnt help either, The so called male witness has also been shown to have prior run ins with kavanaugh in court action as well, that make anything he says very suspect but dems wont let the truth get in the way of anything they do, lost out on impeaching trump so have to look elsewhere. Also the fact that the 2 women that wrote the book this is taken from work for the paper as well especially as it is totally anti trump, again we see anti trump people trying to start something when they cannot produce evidence other than hearsay by anti trumpers, shows how pathetic and desperate dems are

The Activist and Washington lawyer was an attorney for the Clintons during old Bills impeachment trial. No one has come forward and said they saw it happen, all 2^nd and 3^rd hand rumors. The woman in question said (in politically correct language in todays world)) she has no memory of it happening. Which translates to, you are a lying piece of Sh*&$#. She was not interviewed by the two reporters or Steir.

 

The two NYT left wing moon bat reporters, Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly are trying to sale their book, nothing more. They stated on a news interview with Lawrence O’Donnel, who had to retract one of his statements two weeks ago, that it was the NYT that left out (basic facts about an accusation against Kavanaugh because editors removed them).  But during an interview on NPR Fresh Air they did the same thing and left out the facts same as the NYT!

The allegations are that Stier (witnessed Kavanaugh’s friends somehow pushed Kavanaugh’s penis into the hand of a female student at a party in or around the 1980’s.

 

So, here is the really story, Cavanaugh must be one hung Mo-Fo, what two foot at least, he the MAN.

Here is a much more entertaining Story

Someone took Kavanagh’s penis and beat some poor female (let’s make her an illegal, on sorry undocumented democrat voter) student over the head with it and knock her out COLD. She was rushed to the hospital and was determined to have a concussion, caused by a hard head beating. Can’t find any eye witnesses and the medical report has disappeared along with the EMS crew that transported her, not sure what year or location of the party or attack either.

 

 

That TDS kicking in early today. Come on girls, Take your Meds!  

Edited September 18, 2019 by allen303

[PhonThong]

1 hour ago, xylophone said:

Seems like the serial liar in the WH likes to surround himself with other liars and those of dubious character. 

 

He obviously feels at home amongst them!

Another person commenting without any solid proof. Find just one credible witness and I might be swayed. 

[elmrfudd]

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The report is a great deal

more than the small part that has been corrected.

yes, it is a great deal more vacuous and unfounded and as if that was not bad enough,during the process they threatened to smear a person that would not lie to agree with the made up accusation.

[elmrfudd]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Ah, the none denial denial raises its head again.

 

 

Kavanaugh will be subjected to a full investigation and impeachment based upon his past behaviour and perjury, the only question is when. 

and you have actual reasons for this backed up by verified evidence... ???? of course you don't.

 

get over it, the attempted subversion and smears did not work, it is over, go on with your life.

[Curt1591]

5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The report is a great deal

more than the small part that has been corrected.

But, that "small part" illustrates that the allegations are not only uncorroborated, but that friends have said she has told them that she can't recall the encounter. 

Basically, that "small part" translates to "for all we know, the allegations could be complete BS."

 

[Curt1591]

40 minutes ago, elmrfudd said:

and you have actual reasons for this backed up by verified evidence... ???? of course you don't.

 

get over it, the attempted subversion and smears did not work, it is over, go on with your life.

All of it is working great - FOR TRUMP!

 

If you look back a year or so ago, these threads were filled with nothing but anti Trump venom. Anyone that went counter to it, was berated. Now, more and more people are expressing the wish that the dems would hang it up and move on.

This sentiment goes far beyond ThaiVisa forums. People may not like Trump. But, they are getting sick and tired of the politically driven BS.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, PhonThong said:

Another person commenting without any solid proof. Find just one credible witness and I might be swayed. 

Nothing at all for Kavanaugh to worry about then.

[PhonThong]

5 hours ago, Silurian said:

 

Not 1, not 2 but 83 ethics complaints against Kavanaugh, including ethic complaints that came from lawyers, doctors and professors!

 

All evidence to the contrary, Bah...

And no proof. What part of that don't you get?

[Baerboxer]

10 hours ago, sirineou said:

They need to take their time, if he is removed now, trump will just appoint another conservative.

Nadler is right, too busy with trump now, we will deal with kavanaugh later perhaps with a democratic Senate and a democratic president.   

 

Yes, because that's exactly how the left and liberal left work. Spiteful against any who dare have a different view to theirs. Constant hounding and witch hunts to try and drive any who they don't consider politically correct out of office.

 

Let's go back through the who lives of all Democrats. Starting with their current POTUS candidates; their current Senate and Congress leaders; any democrat judges etc. See if we can find some anonymous source whose life was devastated by something that happened 30 or more years ago involving one of these pure people.

 

What a waste of tax payer money, energy and demonstration of closed minded bullying. Hope some of those mouthing off ridiculously get voted out of office. 

[Baerboxer]

37 minutes ago, PhonThong said:

And no proof. What part of that don't you get?

 

Liberal left wing democrats don't require proof. They know only politically correct liberals are fit for office; and can be forgiven anything because they have the right political view.

 

 

[Baerboxer]

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Nothing at all for Kavanaugh to worry about then.

 

Other than a group of narrow minded bigots who political hypocrisy as laughingly referred to of liberalism constantly hounding, making up stories and leaking non supported by fact stories to their friendly media outlets, nothing to worry about.

 

That what the left politicians count. Liberal minded people eagerly ready to believe anything about any politician or public servant who they deem not to be politically correct with the right views.

[sirineou]

5 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

Yes, because that's exactly how the left and liberal left work. Spiteful against any who dare have a different view to theirs. Constant hounding and witch hunts to try and drive any who they don't consider politically correct out of office.

Yes indeed. The right never engaged in politics when Obama was president

[PhonThong]

Too bad the United States doesn't have the same computer crimes act, that Thailand has. Then the whole Democratic party would be in jail.

[stevenl]

1 hour ago, PhonThong said:

And no proof. What part of that don't you get?

Maybe time to investigate then?

[Silurian]

1 hour ago, PhonThong said:

And no proof. What part of that don't you get?

 

Good to know that you believe that ethics rules don’t apply to Supreme Court nominees as long as they get confirmed.

 

Again, current US administration supporters don't mind a fascist rule as long as they get their way.

 

[metisdead]

Troll posts and the replies have been removed. 

 

A troll post containing a trolling representation of Trump's name has been removed as well as a reply. 

[bendejo]

Put it this way: a policeman (not necessarily in Thailand) is searching through your things and finds a packet of cigarette paper.  Can't bust you for that, but what does it tell the cop?  He knows if he looks hard enough he just might find something that changes the game.

Have a look at the Kavanaugh's Senate hearing: he's combative to the point of aggressive, evades questions, and expresses none of the humility one usually bears when seeking Congressional approval.  It is, after all, a job interview, for the biggest job of your life.  The way it usually works in these things is when potentially egregious accusations are made the person being questioned says they welcome an investigation, get all this shinola out of the way once and for all.  When asked if he would welcome an FBI investigation he raved about unfair treatment, his family, Clinton conspiracy, etc.  He was asked several times more ("yes or no, sir?"), which caused further response that devolved into blathering (did he actually cry?), but the senator kept on "yes or no?"  He eventually sat there silent.  After about ten seconds the senator said "I'll take that as a no."

Ok, the point I'm making here is he certainly behaves like he's guilty.  So if you keep looking....

 

Also, before the woman who did accuse him was brought in to testify, the GOP Senate leader said he doesn't care what she says, the approval is going through -- how's that for fairness?  The entire way his approval was pushed through is a disgrace.

 

[elmrfudd]

3 hours ago, bendejo said:

Put it this way: a policeman (not necessarily in Thailand) is searching through your things and finds a packet of cigarette paper.  Can't bust you for that, but what does it tell the cop?  He knows if he looks hard enough he just might find something that changes the game.

Have a look at the Kavanaugh's Senate hearing: he's combative to the point of aggressive, evades questions, and expresses none of the humility one usually bears when seeking Congressional approval.  It is, after all, a job interview, for the biggest job of your life.  The way it usually works in these things is when potentially egregious accusations are made the person being questioned says they welcome an investigation, get all this shinola out of the way once and for all.  When asked if he would welcome an FBI investigation he raved about unfair treatment, his family, Clinton conspiracy, etc.  He was asked several times more ("yes or no, sir?"), which caused further response that devolved into blathering (did he actually cry?), but the senator kept on "yes or no?"  He eventually sat there silent.  After about ten seconds the senator said "I'll take that as a no."

Ok, the point I'm making here is he certainly behaves like he's guilty.  So if you keep looking....

 

Also, before the woman who did accuse him was brought in to testify, the GOP Senate leader said he doesn't care what she says, the approval is going through -- how's that for fairness?  The entire way his approval was pushed through is a disgrace.

 

there quite a lot of opinion in there, with zero evidence of any accusations, you just did not like the way he pushed back at the orchestrated attempt to destroy a person, all due to politics. which is precisely what this entire phony outrage is all about.