Republican lawmakers storm hearing room, disrupt Trump impeachment inquiry

[Crazy Alex]

7 hours ago, Opl said:

and it's good for Neflix series to come about Trump impeachment

Until there is a vote held, there is no impeachment. The minute that vote is held, Democrats lose control of the narrative.

[jm91]

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

I hear Durham's probe into FBI has now been extended into a criminal probe.

So sit tight for a while. Once all the indictments are in, it will likely prove that

Mueller carried out a fraudulently predicated investigation....which means invalid.

 

1 hour ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

I hear Durham's probe into FBI has now been extended into a criminal probe.

So sit tight for a while. Once all the indictments are in, it will likely prove that

Mueller carried out a fraudulently predicated investigation....which means invalid.

Nice spin. No it will be clear that the orange cult leader is using the justice department as a political weapon. Sad the always trump crowd is so anit american. 

[jm91]

4 hours ago, Kelsall said:

So Trump kicked a few butts and told his fellow Republicans to start fighting.  It worked. 

 

My guess is this coup attempt by the Dems will be stopped by political means.  If not, there's always the military and police, both groups quite loyal to Trump.  Doubt if he'll have to use them, though.

Nice spin but following the rule of law is not a coup. Gee you do seem dazed and confused. Or just an apologist for the criminal trump.  

[JHolmesJr]

9 minutes ago, jm91 said:

 

Nice spin. No it will be clear that the orange cult leader is using the justice department as a political weapon. Sad the always trump crowd is so anit american. 

 

No spin....that's the news been reported. FBI misconduct probe widened to criminal investigation.

If criminal activity is proved in obtaining FISA warrant to open (unwarranted) spying on campaign of

political rival ...then POOF...you can flush the Mueller Report and all its findings down the toilet.

Nothing anti American here...only pro justice.

 

Next steps: uncover the whistleblower's (read partisan leaker/mole) identity...now that the Dems have

declared that WB is not required....my personal suspicion is that WB is Ambassador Taylor....if it turns out he has met, colluded with and cooked this whole drama up with Schiff, I hope they both go to jail.

 

Wheels of justice baby...gotta love em.

 

Edited October 25, 2019 by JHolmesJr

[jm91]

32 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

No spin....that's the news been reported. FBI misconduct probe widened to criminal investigation.

If criminal activity is proved in obtaining FISA warrant to open (unwarranted) spying on campaign of

political rival ...then POOF...you can flush the Mueller Report and all its findings down the toilet.

Nothing anti American here...only pro justice.

 

Next steps: uncover the whistleblower's (read partisan leaker/mole) identity...now that the Dems have

declared that WB is not required....my personal suspicion is that WB is Ambassador Taylor....if it turns out he has met, colluded with and cooked this whole drama up with Schiff, I hope they both go to jail.

 

Wheels of justice baby...gotta love em.

 

Nice spin again. The rule of law is being subverted by the cult leader. I find it sad that the followers of the trump cult are so against the rule of law.  It is an illegal use of power. Sad. 

 

[JHolmesJr]

3 minutes ago, jm91 said:

Nice spin again. The rule of law is being subverted by the cult leader. I find it sad that the followers of the trump cult are so against the rule of law.  It is an illegal use of power. Sad. 

 

 

Sad? You should be happy that Trump is going to be impeached and removed from office.

Any day now?

Yes? ????

[Chomper Higgot]

2 hours ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

I hear Durham's probe into FBI has now been extended into a criminal probe.

So sit tight for a while. Once all the indictments are in, it will likely prove that

Mueller carried out a fraudulently predicated investigation....which means invalid.

I’m not sure on what basis you can claim the likely outcome of this ‘probe’ let alone that it will result in indictments.

[jm91]

1 minute ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

Sad? You should be happy that Trump is going to be impeached and removed from office.

Any day now?

Yes? ????

No I am not happy. I am sad the US has such political divisions. 

I think it is sad and erodes democracy. Democracy can not survive when people see the opposing party as the enemy. I think trump is a criminal and should be investigated. The process to investigate him are the rules used in the past. I see spin by people who do not care about truth or the rule of law. I see cult followers. That is sad. 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, Crazy Alex said:

Until there is a vote held, there is no impeachment. The minute that vote is held, Democrats lose control of the narrative.

Correct.

 

The on going process is an investigation to determine articles of impeachment.

 

The impeachment vote will take place after the articles of impeachment have been presented.

[Tippaporn]

Levin calls out Democrats' 'tyrannical' impeachment process.  Excellent analysis of what's really going on.

 

And yes, Durham's administrative review just turned into a criminal inquiry.  Rumours are that certain high level players are lawyering up.

 

It is hoped by many who retain their sanity that when the facts, and what I mean by facts is facts supported by actual documentation which cannot be disputed, come out for all to see that the liberals will finally realize how badly they've been played.  Although my time here on some of these threads has me highly doubtful.

 

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”  George Orwell

 

The hate and twisted logic by the left here is simply mind boggling to behold.

 

 

[Tippaporn]

50 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

No spin....that's the news been reported. FBI misconduct probe widened to criminal investigation.

If criminal activity is proved in obtaining FISA warrant to open (unwarranted) spying on campaign of

political rival ...then POOF...you can flush the Mueller Report and all its findings down the toilet.

Nothing anti American here...only pro justice.

 

Next steps: uncover the whistleblower's (read partisan leaker/mole) identity...now that the Dems have

declared that WB is not required....my personal suspicion is that WB is Ambassador Taylor....if it turns out he has met, colluded with and cooked this whole drama up with Schiff, I hope they both go to jail.

 

Wheels of justice baby...gotta love em.

 

...if it turns out he has met, colluded with and cooked this whole drama up with Schiff, I hope they both go to jail.

 

I would think they would face punishment much more severe.  Treason.

[jm91]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Levin calls out Democrats' 'tyrannical' impeachment process.  Excellent analysis of what's really going on.

 

And yes, Durham's administrative review just turned into a criminal inquiry.  Rumours are that certain high level players are lawyering up.

 

It is hoped by many who retain their sanity that when the facts, and what I mean by facts is facts supported by actual documentation which cannot be disputed, come out for all to see that the liberals will finally realize how badly they've been played.  Although my time here on some of these threads has me highly doubtful.

 

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.”  George Orwell

 

The hate and twisted logic by the left here is simply mind boggling to behold.

 

 

That is complete spin.

Nice but even Fox will tell you that shows like hannity are not news. 

Fox will tell  you they are entertainment. Not news.  

Nice try. 

No democrats are not evil or tyrannical. Or is the rule of law what you not call tyranny?  

Edited October 25, 2019 by jm91

[Tippaporn]

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Correct.

 

The on going process is an investigation to determine articles of impeachment.

 

The impeachment vote will take place after the articles of impeachment have been presented.

In a fair and just world that's not how it works.  The Dems are purposely riding roughshod because, well, they have to.  Schiff can never allow the "whistle blower" to be cross examined.

[Tippaporn]

11 minutes ago, jm91 said:

No I am not happy. I am sad the US has such political divisions. 

I think it is sad and erodes democracy. Democracy can not survive when people see the opposing party as the enemy. I think trump is a criminal and should be investigated. The process to investigate him are the rules used in the past. I see spin by people who do not care about truth or the rule of law. I see cult followers. That is sad. 

The process to investigate him are the rules used in the past.

 

Absolute BS.  See the video I just posted.

[bristolboy]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

In a fair and just world that's not how it works.  The Dems are purposely riding roughshod because, well, they have to.  Schiff can never allow the "whistle blower" to be cross examined.

According to the law, whistleblowers are allowed to keep their anonymity. It isn't Schiff's call to make.

[jm91]

Just now, bristolboy said:

According to the law, whistleblowers are allowed to keep their anonymity. It isn't Schiff's call to make.

Don't confuse people with facts. 

[Tippaporn]

14 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not sure on what basis you can claim the likely outcome of this ‘probe’ let alone that it will result in indictments.

If you'd read outside of the MSM you'd understand very well the basis.  And there's a whole lot of basis.  Much of it documented.  Documentation that can't be argued with.

[candide]

3 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

In a fair and just world that's not how it works.  The Dems are purposely riding roughshod because, well, they have to.  Schiff can never allow the "whistle blower" to be cross examined.

I don't understand this obsession about the whistle blower. Actually, with the documents and testimonies that have been already collected, they would not even need him any more.

[jm91]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

The process to investigate him are the rules used in the past.

 

Absolute BS.  See the video I just posted.

I did and it is from an entertainment show with a republican cult member. 

Sorry the rules are the same as have been used in the past.

 

Stop watching fiction TV and thinking it is reality - hannity is ENTERTAINMENT fiction. 

Even fox tells you that hannity is ENTERTAINMENT...NOT NEWS. 

[Tippaporn]

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

According to the law, whistleblowers are allowed to keep their anonymity. It isn't Schiff's call to make.

Keep regurgitating what you've been told over and over again.  It's a bogus rationale.

 

Do you really believe they can impeach a president without revealing the identity of the whistle blower?  Perhaps that's how it works in fantasy land.

[Tippaporn]

Just now, jm91 said:

I did and it is from an entertainment show with a republican cult member. 

Sorry the rules are the same as have been used in the past.

 

Stop watching fiction TV and thinking it is reality - hannity is ENTERTAINMENT fiction. 

Even fox tells you that hannity is ENTERTAINMENT...NOT NEWS. 

He's reading documentation from the Clinton proceedings.  LOL  Is that your idea of entertainment?

 

If you can't argue with facts please try better than simply trying to discredit the source.

[jm91]

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Keep regurgitating what you've been told over and over again.  It's a bogus rationale.

 

Do you really believe they can impeach a president without revealing the identity of the whistle blower?  Perhaps that's how it works in fantasy land.

Again nice spin..but yes that is how it works. The rule of law and all that. 

I thought conservatives were about the rule of law. But apparently respect for the rule of law is second to loyalty to the cult leader. 

[jm91]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

He's reading documentation from the Clinton proceedings.  LOL  Is that your idea of entertainment?

 

If you can't argue with facts please try better than simply trying to discredit the source.

Try posting something other than ENTERTAINMENT. 

Fox is clear that shows like hannity are NOT news but ENTERTAINMENT. 

 

Nice spin.  

The rule of law is being followed in the impeachment process. 

I thought conservatives were about the rule of law but loyalty to the orange one seems to be more important. 

[Tippaporn]

4 minutes ago, candide said:

I don't understand this obsession about the whistle blower. Actually, with the documents and testimonies that have been already collected, they would not even need him any more.

But, but, but there are two whistle blowers.  No, there are multiple whistle blowers.  Why they even found a whistle blower to blow the whistle on another issue apart from the Zelensky call.

 

Oh, but now the whistle blowers don't matter because the have . . . what?  Testimony from Taylor who heard from someone who heard from someone else?

 

And what documentation?  Whatever documentation they have is meaningless if it doesn't prove anything.  If it did I'm sure Schiff would have leaked it by now.  He never did leak the conclusive evidence he claimed he possessed during the Mueller probe.  Why?  Because he didn't have any.  LOL

[Tippaporn]

6 minutes ago, jm91 said:

Again nice spin..but yes that is how it works. The rule of law and all that. 

I thought conservatives were about the rule of law. But apparently respect for the rule of law is second to loyalty to the cult leader. 

No spin, my friend.

[jm91]

Just now, Tippaporn said:

But, but, but there are two whistle blowers.  No, there are multiple whistle blowers.  Why they even found a whistle blower to blow the whistle on another issue apart from the Zelensky call.

 

Oh, but now the whistle blowers don't matter because the have . . . what?  Testimony from Taylor who heard from someone who heard from someone else?

 

And what documentation?  Whatever documentation they have is meaningless if it doesn't prove anything.  If it did I'm sure Schiff would have leaked it by now.  He never did leak the conclusive evidence he claimed he possessed during the Mueller probe.  Why?  Because he didn't have any.  LOL

Blah blah blah. 

What are you on about? 

The cult leader is being investigated.  

The cult followers seem terrified he will be shown to be a criminal. If he is then the american people have the right to see that. I see conservatives hiding truth.   

[jm91]

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

No spin, my friend.

Yes spin my friend. 

Fox tells you that hannity is ENTERTAINMENT and you think it is news? It is fiction. 

Pure spin...My friend. 

 

I see you don't dispute that hannity is entertainment. I guess you just think fiction is a good source to get your facts. 

[Tippaporn]

5 minutes ago, jm91 said:

Try posting something other than ENTERTAINMENT. 

Fox is clear that shows like hannity are NOT news but ENTERTAINMENT. 

 

Nice spin.  

The rule of law is being followed in the impeachment process. 

I thought conservatives were about the rule of law but loyalty to the orange one seems to be more important. 

Try posting something other than ENTERTAINMENT. 

 

Nonsense.

 

Here's the document Levin is reading from.  Note the difference between then and now.  

 

https://www.congress.gov/105/crpt/hrpt795/CRPT-105hrpt795.pdf

[Tippaporn]

6 minutes ago, jm91 said:

Blah blah blah. 

What are you on about? 

The cult leader is being investigated.  

The cult followers seem terrified he will be shown to be a criminal. If he is then the american people have the right to see that. I see conservatives hiding truth.   

If you have a reasoned, valid argument please continue.

[Tippaporn]

7 minutes ago, jm91 said:

Yes spin my friend. 

Fox tells you that hannity is ENTERTAINMENT and you think it is news? It is fiction. 

Pure spin...My friend. 

 

I see you don't dispute that hannity is entertainment. I guess you just think fiction is a good source to get your facts. 

Again, if you have no facts to argue with then why attack the source.  Especially as the source is providing documentation.  Argue with what Levin is saying.  That might be a start.