New big bikes have incredibly fuel efficient engines that produce negligible pollutants. 

 

Tuk-tuk's on the other hand.....I bet one tuk-tuk produces more noxious emissions in a typical day than a new bike produces in 100's of hours of driving. 

Someone needs to pay for those submarines.

More ridiculous non logic-get the fossils fuel cars off the roads.  Next week they will invent CO2 cleaners anyway 

Just a lame excuse to make more tax money. They copied that from the morons in Germany.

Any punishment on these extremely loud toys is a help.

They should tax them for noise pollution rather than air pollution.

Well the moron brigade are at it again!  So,  they ignore the fact that the worst pollution not just Co2 is spewing from the exhaust pipes of three quarters of the diesel powered vehicles in the country and they decide to clamp an extortionate tax on the  big bike owners.  3 percent of bikes are big bikes.   That is ridiculous.  This is just a money grab plain and simple.

This is really nonsense!  The tour buses and pickup trucks seem to generate 99% of the CO2 emissions in Thailand.  This will just make life difficult for the big bike dealers in Thailand. 

Just another priceless 'stupid statement'... and obviously the person has done their homework... NOT!!

This must be far more efficient than having a policeman take a car out on the road and keep holding up traffic by pulling up ancient smoke machines, right?

After all, nobody likes it when people go out on superbikes... I remember being called into the office after taking my son to school for riding too fast (actually following the cars into school driveway).

 

Obviously the noise can be an issue - but this is just taking advantage of predjudice. 

 

Meanwhile, in my soi alone there must be around 20 busses every morning/afternoon belching huge clouds en route to factories - these things don't sit straight on the road, suspension crumbling and look to be at least 30 years old.

Like way to many governments they never saw a tax they did not like

Never waste any opportunity to add a new tax irrespective of the merits of why. 

5 hours ago, PremiumLane said:

It is one of the factors of warming and big one

Yes, but not as big as methane, and big bikes are a tiny part of CO2 emissions.

 

I agree that climate change is a threat and that CO2 is a factor, but let's be honest, this tax has nothing to do with the environment. 

 

Using global warming as an excuse to take in taxes is simply wrong.

It's because of this type of behaviour that some people choose not to believe in it!
They will tax anything and everything they can now to pay for their over spending.

If they want to put an extra tax on big bikes it should be a noise tax. 100.000 bath tax for bikes that make more noise than a diesel van :).

10 hours ago, fasteddie said:

Ridiculous, Co2 is plant food and has never been the cause of warming, quite the opposite in fact.

 

Much ado. . .   

CO2, what a lovely excuse to tax people. 

CO2 in the atmosphere: 0.04%

Man made CO2 is about 5% of total CO2 => 5% from 0.04%

All cars and bikes are about 2% of total CO2 => 2% from 5% from 0.04%

 

Thailand produces less than 1% of all of this => 1% from 2% from 5% from 0.04%

 

=> 0.01 x 0.02 x 0.05 x 0.0004 = 0.000.000.004 => 0.000.000.4% !!!

That is a pretty tiny number ... but it surely is worth 100,000 THB !!!

 

BTW ... Agriculture and the Military are the biggest producers of CO2 !!!

Also the big Container ships: The biggest 15 container ships produce as much pollution

as all cars on the planet combined !!! [bunker fuel; the dirtiest fuel you could ever use]

 

It's all insanity !!! Madness !!! ... but it's the agenda of the day.

40 years ago they told us we run out of oil, then they told us about an ice age, then global warming

and now it's climate change. Always the same story and people just love to fall for it !!!

 

I love CO2 !!! And so does nature !!!

I really do not understand what all the hoo haa is about. Many countries are adopting the policy of applying greater taxation on higher polluting vehicles. Including many of the developed countries that we come from. Probably all of them.

 

And stands to reason, very logical reason, that the bigger the vehicle, the more the pollution it produces. Hence Bigger bike=bigger engine=more fuel used=more CO² produced.

 

Or is this yet another case of: 'A Thai said it so it must be vilified. whether he's right or not'?

 

 

9 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

And stands to reason, very logical reason, that the bigger the vehicle, the more the pollution it produces. Hence Bigger bike=bigger engine=more fuel used=more CO² produced.

Sure, pollution like particles from incomplete combustion and so on. But CO2 is what you are drinking in your soda water and breathing in all the time, hardly a pollutant.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonated_water

Another d1ckhead idea <deleted>....

"the owners can afford it,” Nutthakorn said.

More Thai GREED!

Every day, another government department, another government scheme, an inherent part of the indigenous culture, "they can afford it".

This is just another idea that is going after the minority,as they

know it will not cause too much blow back,like if they applied

the same tax to say 150-175 cc, looks like they are doing something

to combat CO2, but it does nothing.

 

Just like the salt tax,put it on snacks, but not Fish sauce,salt in

street food,or traditional foods,where Thais would get the most

salt from,but they know better than to try and do that.

regards worgeordie

26 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

Sure, pollution like particles from incomplete combustion and so on. But CO2 is what you are drinking in your soda water and breathing in all the time, hardly a pollutant.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonated_water

Yes correct. emissions would have been a better choice of word in that context. None the less it is CO²  emissions is what the thread is all about.

A good time to buy a nice Christmas present.

 

Can always sell it 2 months later for the same price.

1 minute ago, ChipButty said:

A good time to buy a nice Christmas present.

 

Can always sell it 2 months later for the same price.

A big bike is for life, not just for Christmas. ????

 

8 hours ago, PremiumLane said:

It is one of the factors of warming and big one

Strange it never has been in the past..... The 800 year lag in CO2 after temperature – graphed « JoNova

I think the increased TAX is much to high. What about the thousands of commercial trucks bellowing tons of exhaust 

fumes? ....

6 hours ago, Moonlover said:

Do some homework.

 

Although much less abundant than nitrogen and oxygen in Earth's atmosphere, carbon dioxide is an important constituent of our planet's air. A molecule of carbon dioxide (CO₂) is made up of one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms. Carbon dioxide is an important greenhouse gas that helps to trap heat in our atmosphere.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas

I did and Co2 has never caused warming..... The 800 year lag in CO2 after temperature – graphed « JoNova

8 hours ago, Momofarang said:

Most stupid post of the year.

Oh really, then please explain why in the past when Co2 was 6,000ppm+ the planet thrived. Co2 has never been a cause of warming but a product..... The 800 year lag in CO2 after temperature – graphed « JoNova

7 hours ago, Moonlover said:

Do some homework.

 

Although much less abundant than nitrogen and oxygen in Earth's atmosphere, carbon dioxide is an important constituent of our planet's air. A molecule of carbon dioxide (CO₂) is made up of one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms. Carbon dioxide is an important greenhouse gas that helps to trap heat in our atmosphere.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas

and  so is h20 which is way  more abundant