Jump to content

Can Sanders beat Trump? A growing number of Democratic voters say yes


webfact

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

More Americans are afraid of commies than are afraid of idiots. 

 

Also what 45 is is already well baked in. 

 

Also 45 is one of the most skilled propagandists in world history. 

the Socialist label to Sanders is just as baked in.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

More Americans are afraid of commies than are afraid of idiots. 

 

Also what 45 is is already well baked in. 

 

Also 45 is one of the most skilled propagandists in world history. 

We are afraid of Communists, and we find that all communist sympathizers are idiots.

 

The Democrat party is in process of putting a Marxist Trotskyite on the top of their ticket. The Democrat convention is likely to be a laugh riot inside, and a real riot outside.

 

Donald J Trump has fought back against a mob posing as political party, and beat them down every step of the way. And someone earlier said apathetic people vote because of their 401k. That's not apathy, that is called a vote cast in confidence!

 

Time to put an end to this bunch. Let them resurface with a new name, but Democrats is a name disgraced forever. 

 

Approximately, 6 months until John Durham shows up to shower the Democrats with love.

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Cory1848 said:

Very good question. I, too, would love to see Sanders get in (or Warren; I’d be happy with either), but the Democrats have been calling Trump an idiot for three years and his base remains firm at 35-40 percent, and his support has even gone up since the impeachment. Plus, there are cynics who vote exclusively on what their 401Ks are doing, and those have done well. Plus, there are all the reasons Jingthing mentioned above that favor an incumbent and especially this incumbent. Republicans seem to paint “dirtier” than Democrats do.

 

Other Sanders supporters who are friends of mine say it’s all about getting the vote out, especially young voters, who are often apathetic during elections. Plus, an article I recently read somewhere pointed out the numbers of African Americans in crucial urban areas like Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia, Miami, and even Atlanta and Charlotte, who simply didn’t vote last time (was it Hillary?), who could also turn those states around if they voted this time. Sanders even talks about Texas, and why not? I recently spent some time in Texas, and it’s an interesting place. If he can spend more effort generating broader enthusiasm and less time talking about Trump (simply calling Trump an idiot doesn’t work), anything can happen, but it’s risky ...

Stacey Yvonne Abrams can bring out a ton of the VOTE

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Yes you MUST go on I need to hear your reasoning Is this too hard to answer other than mentioning some people he sees some  agreement with 

My reasoning....is found in the word and deed of Comandante Sanders as captured in text and video. Pretend you are one of us so you can begin your refutations. Take a quick walk through the 40 year historical record!

 

If you don't feel like hunting this down, no worries, soon enough it will be in virtually every television commercial supporting Donald J Trump for re-election. To the point that, I bet your question as to how my conclusions are arrived at never rises again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Well put... It's totally stupid on the part of the American public at large.

 

But it's probably indeed the truth, and especially when it comes to the presidential race.

 

 

We are afraid of a Communist Idiot becoming President of the United States.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, riclag said:

Perhaps, its because government and powerful leaders of the party are controlling things with the emphasis on radical leaders in power and democratic process  interpretation

 

"Democratic socialism, a growing U.S. political movement in recent years, lands somewhere in between social democracy and communism. Like communists, democratic socialists believe workers should control the bulk of the means of production, and not be subjected to the will of the free market and the capitalist classes. But they believe their vision of socialism must be achieved through democratic processes, rather than revolution. 

https://www.history.com/news/socialism-communism-differences

 

 And perhaps it's simply because the pressure from insurance companies to not change the current scenario is incredible strong.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Stacey Yvonne Abrams can bring out a ton of the VOTE

I think the bloom may be off that rose.  Money, while being highly effective if deployed in sufficient quantities, taints everything.

 

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a30981335/stacey-abrams-is-wrong-to-compare-bloombergs-dollar350-million-spending-spree-to-campaigning-with-a-dog/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

We are afraid of a Communist Idiot becoming President of the United States.

A communist would have absolutely no power as POTUS. Where would he find consensus to achieve communisty goals? Congress? The Supreme Court? The military? Nowhere, that's where. You should try to come up with a lighter shade of red herring.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, genericptr said:

If Bernie had a plan to claw back corporate subsidies then I would support that. If that was his platform to FIRST get back taxes revenue from other areas and then spend it on health care that would be interesting but that's not what's going to happen.

Clawing back all corporate subsidy will soon become a necessary part of American policy for either party in power. Lowering taxes may work to stimulate, but Gov expenditures must be cut, as debt is unsustainable in the longterm.

 

Immigration needs to be fixed now! Fenced border, and a chip/barcode photo social security card to prevent illegals working, which is a net drain on the treasury.

 

Important also, as LEGAL immigration, may well likewise become quite important in coming decades, but on our terms.

 

The United States defense posture must change, Europe must be left in totality. Let France and Germany decide who leads the EU army to oppose potential Russian aggression. Maritime nations need to rebuild their Navy's to real strength to be able to protect their own trade.

 

China is doing something not seen since the pre world war II era, a global power is rising, a power which has publicly stated it is building an armed forces to have the ability to fight and win conflicts in any global theater. 

 

They have elected a President for life, something which has always gone well in this world. Two full battle groups in the water, a 3rd about to roll out, and 20 on the drawing board. The belt and road initiative gives ability to move forces rapidly. In Southeast Asia Chinese money is eroding Western alliances, and Chinese soft power is growing, as well as Chinese weapon sales.

 

While Obama slept the Chinese built south China sea military bases upon disputed territories leaving the Trump administration with the unsavory, and unlikely method of direct war with China as the only method to dislodge them.

 

China claims the entire south China sea, and seems to eerily be modeling Imperial Japan. Japanese generals have stated they expect China to attack Japanese out lying disputed territories in coming decades, as well as Taiwan.

 

To counter a foe with a global roaming Navy, and deep pockets ( unlike the Soviets who had empty pockets) the United States needs a massive ship building program! Massive!

 

Unfortunately, as you mention the USA has imported a massive 20 million base of illegals who in one generation are changing forever the voting base of the country.

 

A leftist lean, increasing entitlement programs, redux in military spending, and a fracturing national will is what can be expected from this permanent left majority when it takes power.

 

Sanders is but a shadow of the power the left will bring in another 20 years if allowed to continue. Dark times ahead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, lannarebirth said:

A communist would have absolutely no power as POTUS. Where would he find consensus to achieve communisty goals? Congress? The Supreme Court? The military? Nowhere, that's where. You should try to come up with a lighter shade of red herring.

If the word socialist helps you to feel warm and fuzzy inside when describing "communisty" Sanders go ahead and call him one. Or even call him a Democrat. Just don't expect the same from me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

If the word socialist helps you to feel warm and fuzzy inside when describing "communisty" Sanders go ahead and call him one. Or even call him a Democrat. Just don't expect the same from me.

He's not even a socialist, but I think you know that.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many people like Sanders ideas and there is merit in some of them but when the time comes the majority would hesitate, as with Corbyn, and not vote for someone offering free stuff as they, the people, would have to pay. I think Trump would fairly easily defeat Sanders but not so easily boring Joe Biden. Still let's see it's fun anyhow I love watching it unravel.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WalkingOrders said:

We are afraid of a Communist Idiot becoming President of the United States.

Hahaha... the sky is falling. But seriously, I had no idea that Vermont was the home of so many communist American voters... they just keep on re-electing a damn communist... I've seen the way they make you line-up for the lifts at Smugglers. ????

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mikebike said:

Hahaha... the sky is falling. But seriously, I had no idea that Vermont was the home of so many communist American voters... they just keep on re-electing a damn communist... I've seen the way they make you line-up for the lifts at Smugglers. ????

Such is your view. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Cory1848 said:

Unfortunately, I think you’re right, the Republicans will have little trouble painting Sanders as a communist, at least sufficiently to turn enough gullible voters against him. But Republican politicking is so deep in the gutter, if for instance Buttigieg somehow ends up as the candidate I’m sure they would find subtle ways of inciting homophobia, for instance via Medal of Freedom winner Rush Limbaugh. The Democrats have had three+ years to prepare for this, and it’s all starting to look like a slow-motion train wreck.

Shoe on the other foot Bernie has tie's to the kremlin! NYT reports the russian's want him, stands to reason !

"But wait. Following closely on this unspecific leak to (where else?) The New York Times, we now hear that Russia wants Mr. Sanders as the next president. Perhaps it’s out of gratitude because he and his wife honeymooned in the Soviet Union. Ah, nostalgia".

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/26/bernie-sanders-russias-ideal-socialist-communist-c/

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bernie-sanders-honeymoon-russia/

 “The Goal is that by encouraging citizen-to-citizen exchange … we can break down the barriers and stereotypes which exist between the Soviet Union and the United States.”

 

According to snopes it wasn't a honeymoon in a traditional sense! it was establishing a sister city relationship even worse imop!

But the hypocrisy is when the POTUS says we should get along with russia is different, hey comrade

 

Edited by riclag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, sirineou said:

When trump tries to paint Sanders as a communist, which he is not, What is preventing Sanders from painting trump as an Idiot, which he is?

Or is it that the republicans are the only ones with painting skills? 

They tried all that and more last time- so how did that work out?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...