13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Guilt by ‘for all we know’.

That's odd. I never mentioned guilt. In the US, even CNN has rights. While I don't believe them, their guilt would be established in a court of law. Here is how it works. How does it work where you are from?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_(law)

10 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

No, you're wrong. The comment was not random. It was a direct response to someone posting about attacks on the media. And as stated, the media is worthy of being attacked.

 

No media outlet, especially CNN, should be trusted when they post a video of them being arrested. For all we know, they were repeatedly told to get out of the way and failed to do so.

CNN did not show a video of the arrest. The arrest was transmitted in real time , as it happened.

Later the police authority responsible for the arrest released the crew and apologised.

3 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

That's odd. I never mentioned guilt. In the US, even CNN has rights. While I don't believe them, their guilt would be established in a court of law. Here is how it works. How does it work where you are from?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt_(law)

Says man asserting the advocating attacks on the media:

 

“Attacks on the media? There aren't enough.”

 

I recommend you read the First Amendment.

 

...

 

And quit with the trying to guess we’re I’m from, nothing I have ever posted on TVF will give you even a clue.

 

My nationality is not and will not be a topic of discussion.

 

Try sticking to the topic under discussion, you’ll find it at the top of the thread.