Jump to content

Britain nears abandoning Brexit trade deal hope - The Telegraph


webfact

Recommended Posts

No

58 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 A fine example of how the gullible swallowed Cummings' and Farage's lies in 2016.

 

Brexit has made no difference to the migrant/refugee/asylum situation in the UK.

 

Those people you refer to as 'scum' do not and never have come under the aegis of the FoM directive. They are not EU/EEA or Swiss nationals and so their applications to remain here are covered completely and only by the UK's own laws and regulations; always have been.

 

In addition, most legal immigration to the UK has always come from outside the EU/EEA and Switzerland. Brexit will make no difference to that.

 

ONS Population by Country of Birth and Nationality statistics via The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford

f34865d264b19528e92f8fe7b8a8609db85d1460.png

 

No difference?  hopeless,   why comment when reports are completely opposite what you are spouting  Brexit will make the difference,the ones you love ,the illegals,are well and truly under the cosh,little wonder vigilantes have formed to meet the scum arriving

 Public resentment The Times/Telegraph,not to mention the other tabloids making far more awareness of the problem the UK faces from the scum. The 'laws" you state are being ignored,already flights arranged and legal aid far more difficult if challenged...  just to get them to France quickly,get rid,

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, melvinmelvin said:

and to top it off an unelected civil service - just as in EU

 

True ...both U.K. and the E.U. dont give the people even the right to vote for who become the garbage service people ....????????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, 7by7 said:

 

Yes it is; or parts of it.

 

Are you seriously suggesting putting the English/Scottish border there?

 

Be giving a large chunk of North England to Scotland if we did!

 

hadrians wall Scotland England border

I made no reference to a border, just the Romans handy work....????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, 7by7 said:

 A fine example of how the gullible swallowed Cummings' and Farage's lies in 2016.

 

Brexit has made no difference to the migrant/refugee/asylum situation in the UK.

 

Those people you refer to as 'scum' do not and never have come under the aegis of the FoM directive. They are not EU/EEA or Swiss nationals and so their applications to remain here are covered completely and only by the UK's own laws and regulations; always have been.

 

In addition, most legal immigration to the UK has always come from outside the EU/EEA and Switzerland. Brexit will make no difference to that.

 

ONS Population by Country of Birth and Nationality statistics via The Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford

f34865d264b19528e92f8fe7b8a8609db85d1460.png

 

We haven't finished Brexit stuff yet.....Why are you jumping the gun.....Again....?....:coffee1:

Remainers embarrassing themselves again......:wacko:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, izod10 said:

No

No difference?  hopeless,   why comment when reports are completely opposite what you are spouting  Brexit will make the difference,the ones you love ,the illegals,are well and truly under the cosh,little wonder vigilantes have formed to meet the scum arriving

 Public resentment The Times/Telegraph,not to mention the other tabloids making far more awareness of the problem the UK faces from the scum. The 'laws" you state are being ignored,already flights arranged and legal aid far more difficult if challenged...  just to get them to France quickly,get rid,

Which reports are saying brexit makes a difference to the immigrant situation in the UK?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

Parliaments should be filled with intellectuals and professionals from all walks of life.

That's what the House of Lords is meant to be. Very arguable how effective it is.

 

4 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

Their names are drawn from a list and they have to serve one year with no other outside interests.

But like jury duty.  

It would take a year to learn the job. I'd argue the opposite. Imo a 4 or 5 year parliament is too short to effect any real change; politicians are always looking to the next election and will not enact policies which may be necessary, but are not popular e.g. tax rises.

 

Personally, I always thought the old French Presidential term of 7 years was about right. Just about long enough for most policies to take effect and be judged but not so long as to undermine democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

I have said for years that anyone who wants to be a politician should be barred from being a politician.

Parliaments should be filled with intellectuals and professionals from all walks of life.

Their names are drawn from a list and they have to serve one year with no other outside interests.

But like jury duty.  

Absolutely, I have been saying the same myself for a long time. Ambition, particularly ruthless ambition, should immediately disqualify you from top posts in Government and in other walks of life. The problem is that, again and again, we see people elected, or who seize power, and have no idea what to do with it when they have it. Their only motivation was to actually be in power. Boris is a good example, great for a few (Often laughable) headline ideas like a bridge to Ireland, but absolutely useless when it comes to detail. 

 

Did you hear what happened to Fred?...........he got lifted off the street and forced to be Home Secretary. He is totally distraught, he only wanted to carry on his job as a Social Worker!  ????

 

It is impossible to imagine how anyone could do any worse than the current bunch of completely unqualified, utter inadequates.

It looks like they have simply resorted to lining their own pockets, and those of their friends, because that's the only world they ever knew. Thailand could give them no lessons in corruption. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

And yet all you Brexiteers have a little hissy fit if anyone says anything derogatory about Johnsons appearance. 

Indeed, make a reference to Johnson using a tag like "Bojo the clown" will see the post removed.

Why is it acceptable for you guys to reference Scotlands First Minister with childish name calling?

i do apologise,didn,t know you have fantasies about her.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

I have said for years that anyone who wants to be a politician should be barred from being a politician.

Parliaments should be filled with intellectuals and professionals from all walks of life.

Their names are drawn from a list and they have to serve one year with no other outside interests.

But like jury duty.  

wonderful idea although think you,ll find the only people you get doing jury service haven,t got the brains to get out of it,4 times i,ve been called up,never done it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, izod10 said:

<snip>

No difference?  hopeless,   why comment when reports are completely opposite what you are spouting  Brexit will make the difference

Explain how Brexit will make a difference to refugees/asylum seekers/migrants, call them what you will, in the UK when dealing with them has always been a matter for individual members, in this case the UK, not the EU and so has never been subject to any EU law or regulation.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, transam said:

We haven't finished Brexit stuff yet.....Why are you jumping the gun.....Again....?....:coffee1:

Remainers embarrassing themselves again......:wacko:

It is @izod10 who is jumping the gun, not I. 

 

I am merely pointing out that his rants are nothing to do with the EU and the situation will not be affected one iota by Brexit.

 

But, of course, as usual you have to resort to rubbishing facts you cannot disprove.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, kingdong said:

wonderful idea although think you,ll find the only people you get doing jury service haven,t got the brains to get out of it,4 times i,ve been called up,never done it.

That's your attitude to doing your civic duty!

 

Explains a lot.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/8/2020 at 5:05 AM, Andrew65 said:

BF people were/are based on the French side because of an agreement. The border between Britain & France is the border of the Schengen Area, much more relevant than where the continental shelf is, in this regard.

 There's a similar thing going on about the where Irish border should be, on land or in the Irish Sea.

The big change begins : https://www.gov.uk/government/news/home-secretary-appoints-small-boat-commander

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kingdong said:

not attitude,don,t do it out of principle,you will probably have to look the word up.

 So your principles mean that you try any and all methods to dodge your civic duty; got it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 So your principles mean that you try any and all methods to dodge your civic duty; got it.

herd mentality?think you,ve got flock of sheep mentality,i also consider it my duty not to aid and abet paedopile rings,so run along and do your "civic duty" and check your tv license is in date.

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...