Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Video: Navy plane successfully lands without front landing gear - all 14 safe

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

Video: Navy plane successfully lands without front landing gear - all 14 safe

 

5pm_VI.jpg

Picture: Sanook

 

Video footage from Narathiwat airport in the far south of Thailand showed the moment when a Thai Royal Navy Fokker aircraft landed successfully without its front landing gear deploying. 

 

 

The F-27 MK 200 slid along the runway before coming to a safe stop. Fire crews were soon on the scene as the 12 passengers and two crew hurriedly disembarked. 

 

Navy spokesman Vice Admiral Prachachat Sirisawat said that the plane was on a flight from U-Tapao airport to Narathiwat when a problem was detected with the front landing gear. 

 

 

 

Attempts to dislodge it failed and the crew were obliged to make an emergency landing. 

 

Behind the controls were Commander Chatchawan Prasitwech and Flight Lieutenant Kopkit Santikun.

 

Source: Sanook

 

 

  • Popular Post

Well done that pilot - but why did the fire trucks take so long to arrive

I didn't know that anyone flew F27s any more. The were old 30 years ago. From google: 

 

In addition to the 581 F27s built by Fokker, 128 F-27s and 78 FH-227s were built. In February 2010, only one Fairchild FH-227 aircraft, FH-227E serial number 501 belonging to the Myanmar Air Force, remained in active service.[citation needed]

Time to put an order in for one ,two or a few new ones,

it's only money.......the taxpayers.

regards Worgeordie

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, worgeordie said:

Time to put an order in for one ,two or a few new ones,

it's only money.......the taxpayers.

regards Worgeordie

what so that they can crash those as well? 

  • Popular Post

Normally they can be manually wound down so why not ?

 

I've always said you gotta watch those Fokkers !

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, JoePai said:

Well done that pilot - but why did the fire trucks take so long to arrive

A really good text book crash landing.

 

I agree about the fire trucks being slow off the mark. They should have been waiting close to the runway before the aircraft landed, and gone boot to the floor as soon as it passed them.

  • Popular Post

That's one lucky Fokker ....

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, worgeordie said:

Time to put an order in for one ,two or a few new ones,

it's only money.......the taxpayers.

regards Worgeordie

Navy operating old planes, one crashes. Thaigeezers complain.

 

Navy orders NEW planes  to replace outdated unsafe ones. Thaigeezers complain.

 

Lose -lose for Thai navy either way.

 

Kudos to the pilot for getting it down on the deck without and injuries.- strange people didn't mention that.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Pilotman said:

I didn't know that anyone flew F27s any more. The were old 30 years ago. From google: 

 

In addition to the 581 F27s built by Fokker, 128 F-27s and 78 FH-227s were built. In February 2010, only one Fairchild FH-227 aircraft, FH-227E serial number 501 belonging to the Myanmar Air Force, remained in active service.[citation needed]

B-52, Hercules, Hueys, Cobras, DC-3/C-47s, just for a start (and that's just a few military aircraft) Some airlines have just taken 747s out of service.

 

Just because an airframe is old doesn't mean it hasn't been updated and modernised- in some cases they haven't and still soldier on

2 hours ago, JoePai said:

Well done that pilot - but why did the fire trucks take so long to arrive

That would involve proactive thinking.

7 minutes ago, Psimbo said:

B-52, Hercules, Hueys, Cobras, DC-3/C-47s, just for a start (and that's just a few military aircraft) Some airlines have just taken 747s out of service.

 

Just because an airframe is old doesn't mean it hasn't been updated and modernised- in some cases they haven't and still soldier on

I never said otherwise.  

5 minutes ago, Psimbo said:

B-52, Hercules, Hueys, Cobras, DC-3/C-47s, just for a start (and that's just a few military aircraft) Some airlines have just taken 747s out of service.

 

Just because an airframe is old doesn't mean it hasn't been updated and modernised- in some cases they haven't and still soldier on

I just looked up the list of RTN aircraft here.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Thai_Naval_Air_Division

  • Popular Post
2 hours ago, JoePai said:

Well done that pilot - but why did the fire trucks take so long to arrive

I heard someone borrowed the horses and they had to wait till they returned with them.

History of Fire Engines | Boise Mobile Equipment (BME)

  • Popular Post
5 hours ago, webfact said:

Video: Navy plane successfully lands without front landing gear - all 14 safe

Great landing, the captain kept the nose up nicely while reducing speed until dropping it and keeping a straight line without steerage. A couple of belly skins, nose-wheel check and back up in the air.

The fire trucks arrived at the aircraft no more than 20 seconds after it stopped. Damn good if you ask me.

 

What do you lot want, the fire truck to be waiting at the aircraft stopping point?

5 hours ago, billd766 said:

A really good text book crash landing.

 

I agree about the fire trucks being slow off the mark. They should have been waiting close to the runway before the aircraft landed, and gone boot to the floor as soon as it passed them.

Good job by the pilot, and emergency crew. I would say the fire trucks were deployed properly alongside the runway, and you can see them racing into motion as the aircraft passed, arriving at the plane within seconds as they chased after it. If the gear that did not deploy was one of the wheels under the wings instead, the plane could have spun, and rolled, then the trucks would have been in the best position away on the sides, but in the middle of the runway in that case.

5 hours ago, Psimbo said:

Navy operating old planes, one crashes. Thaigeezers complain.

 

Navy orders NEW planes  to replace outdated unsafe ones. Thaigeezers complain.

 

Lose -lose for Thai navy either way.

 

Kudos to the pilot for getting it down on the deck without and injuries.- strange people didn't mention that.

No. Military order luxury plane for Senior officers. Thai geezers complain!

Great Job. The main damage was to the nose gear and undercarriage. No engine or Prop damage. 

I've watched a C-5, C141 and C130 come down with nose gear and main landing gear malfunctions with very little damage also. Walking away from any aircraft with a difficult landing is great. 

Well controlled  Landing by the the flight crew everybody walked away hats off to them 

Without front landing gear? Nonsense. Unless it fell off the gear is up in the nose gear well!

 

 

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.