Four state attorneys general back Trump on social media regulation push

[webfact]

Four state attorneys general back Trump on social media regulation push

By David Shepardson

 

FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks to mark the 75th anniversary of the end of World War II and to designate Wilmington as an American World War II Heritage City during an event held at the USS Battleship North Carolina in Wilmington, North Carolina, U.S., September 2, 2020. REUTERS/Leah Millis

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Four Republican state attorneys general led by Texas backed President Donald Trump's push to narrow the ability of social media companies to remove objectionable content and require new transparency rules.

 

Texas, Louisiana, Indiana and Missouri's state attorneys general said in joint comments made public on Thursday that new rules are needed. They argue social media platforms cannot be truly free "unless the participants understand the rules of the forum, and competition is able to provide alternatives when speech restrictions go too far."

 

The attorneys general added that the "examples are legion of online platforms downplaying, editing, or even suppressing political speech that bears no relationship to the traditionally regulated categories of speech." On Wednesday, a group representing major internet companies including Facebook Inc, Amazon.com Inc and Alphabet Inc's Google urged the Federal Communications Commission to reject a petition filed by the Trump administration, saying it was "misguided, lacks grounding in law, and poses serious public policy concerns."

 

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai dismissed calls from the two Democrats on the agency's five-member commission to reject the petition without public comment. He has declined to comment on the petition's merits.

 

The Republican president directed the Commerce Department to file the petition after Twitter Inc in May warned readers to fact-check his posts about unsubstantiated claims of fraud in mail-in voting.

 

The Republican attorneys general cited Twitter's decision to flag earlier Trump's tweet.

 

"Twitter claimed the tweet was supported by 'no evidence' despite the fact that many experts — including signatories to this letter — can validate that claim," they wrote.

 

Twitter on Thursday flagged two more tweets from Trump for violating its rules on civic and election integrity by urging voters to cast ballots twice, via mail and in person.

 

Also on Thursday, Facebook said it would stop accepting new political ads in the week before U.S. elections on Nov. 3 in a series of moves it billed as its final plan for reducing risks of misinformation and election interference.

 

The petition asks the FCC to limit protections for social media companies under Section 230, a provision of the 1996 Communications Decency Act that shields social media companies from liability for content posted by their users and allows them to remove lawful but objectionable posts.

 

(Reporting by David Shepardson; editing by Jonathan Oatis)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-09-04

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

[Paul Henry]

Baby Donald can't get his own way with Twitter so he now wants to regulate them.Thin edge of the wedge.What platform or media will be next. Definitely learning from his mates Vlad and Kim. Donald is working hard to get rid of democracy. Maybe put censorship under control of DOJ Bill will do whatever he is told (No questions asked)

[mrfill]

And while they're dicking around moaning about not being able to kill anyone with their assault rifles, free speech disappears out the window.

[George Aylesham]

At least the article clearly specifies the that they are Republican AGs.

[mtls2005]

Four state AGs said that new rules are needed.

 

Yawn.

 

 

[FangFerang]

On 9/4/2020 at 4:24 PM, mrfill said:

And while they're dicking around moaning about not being able to kill anyone with their assault rifles, free speech disappears out the window.

To where did free speech disappear?  And whose free speech?  Social media Always restricted free speech.  

[Sujo]

Only 4? Not exactly a vote of confidence. Perhaps donald should stick to 4chan and OAN to peddle his lies.

[Chomper Higgot]

It will eventually filter through to the people funding the Republican Party that the proposed regulations are an infringement on private businesses and as such a threat to free market capitalism.

 

 

 

 

[bluehippie]

Most likely the social media platforms fine print stipulate under the terms of service something like "if you don't like what we do, feel free to stop using this service..."

Stop using twitter and find an alternate and then watch what happens to twitters popularity.

Edited September 9, 2020 by bluehippie

[OneMoreFarang]

There wouldn't be a problem if Trump and a few others wouldn't lie all the time.

 

Personally I think no politician should be allowed to deliberately lie. Every time they lie they should be required to go on national TV and apologize for their lies and then they have to tell the truth. In a way I guess Trump would like that. He would be constantly on TV...

[heybruce]

I would support this if the intent were to require social media sites to identify lies and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.  However I assume Trump wants to prevent social media sites from identifying lies and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.