Trump jeered as he visits Ginsburg's casket at U.S. Supreme Court

[CorpusChristie]

2 minutes ago, Taco said:

That was great!   

You enjoy watching people being disrespectful and abusive at funerals ?

Its terrible behavior, to act the way they did .

Their Parents have failed in bringing their Children up to be decent Human beings 

[Sujo]

26 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

Trumps an evil man, because some people booed him at a funeral ?

Trump is so evil it compelled people to boo him. It isnt a funeral.

[Sujo]

9 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

You enjoy watching people being disrespectful and abusive at funerals ?

Its terrible behavior, to act the way they did .

Their Parents have failed in bringing their Children up to be decent Human beings 

I did enjoy watching trump get ridiculed. I dont care where it happens. He has lowered the bar so far down that this doesnt even rate on his deplorable scale.

[yardrunner]

8 hours ago, Tug said:

What’s disgraceful about how the population feels about this abomination of a president?that’s what happens when he’s exposed to the American people that’s exactly how the majority of Americans feel about mr trump 

and a lot of people in other countries

[CorpusChristie]

3 minutes ago, Sujo said:

I did enjoy watching trump get ridiculed. I dont care where it happens. He has lowered the bar so far down that this doesnt even rate on his deplorable scale.

Has Trump previously jeered at a funeral ?

[Sujo]

1 minute ago, CorpusChristie said:

Has Trump previously jeered at a funeral ?

Who cares. He is a deplorable cretin and deserves any ridicule coming his way.

 

 

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, owl sees all said:

I hear that it is a sex-free relationship between Melania and The Don. So there is always a chance.

Owls are noted for their hearing as well as their sight, so I believe you. They can hear a mouse squeaking at half a mile.

[Tippaporn]

4 minutes ago, yardrunner said:

8 hours ago, Tug said:

What’s disgraceful about how the population feels about this abomination of a president?that’s what happens when he’s exposed to the American people that’s exactly how the majority of Americans feel about mr trump 

and a lot of people in other countries

Just remember, by the same token there are a lot of people in other countries who like and admire Trump.

[CorpusChristie]

1 minute ago, Sujo said:

Who cares. He is a deplorable cretin and deserves any ridicule coming his way.

 

 

I think that a person who is paying their respects to a deceased person, should be left to do so peacefully .

  Appalling (but expected) behavior from the jeering mob

[Morch]

2 hours ago, owl sees all said:

There have been very few POTUS that history has given them a 'thumbs up'.

 

The Don may not be your cup of tea PatOngo, but he was voted into his position by the US people. If the Dem's want to win they have to start talking 'policy'; in other words what they envisage doing if they get back in. All I hear is constant demonizing of Trump from the US media. Times have changed. The last election proved that.

 

The Dem's have no chance in this coming election; and they know it. Biden and Harris. That's the best the Dem's could do? Dear me! Both have too much dodgy history. Huge swathes of the voting public in the US know their histories very well. And if I do, then the good American people do.

 

He was voted in by the Electoral College, claiming it's the same as the US people is a stretch. Not how the USA system is set up. The usual comments about Democrats not talking about 'policy' or 'the issues' is at best uninformed, and many a time, an attempt to sow misinformation. Don't see this bogus issue raised as per the Republican Party or Trump.

 

The Democrats have a fair chance this election, though nothing is assured of course. Even the unexciting candidates fielded are a match for the incumbent, which says quite a lot. Everything which you mention regarding their record and past applies to Trump as well.

[Morch]

3 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Again, where's the evidence that Trump will?  If there's no evidence then on what basis does Biden make that assumption and then preemptively hire 600 lawyers?  Does that make sense?  Which begs the question as to whether there's another reason he's hiring 600 lawyers.  Is he creating a false narrative as cover for other intentions?

 

The evidence is in Trump's actions and words. Plus, not forgetting Republican Party shenanigans.

[Tippaporn]

11 minutes ago, Sujo said:

23 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

You enjoy watching people being disrespectful and abusive at funerals ?

Its terrible behavior, to act the way they did .

Their Parents have failed in bringing their Children up to be decent Human beings 

I did enjoy watching trump get ridiculed. I dont care where it happens. He has lowered the bar so far down that this doesnt even rate on his deplorable scale.

Hypocrisy says it's O.K. to be divisive as long as it's you and not the other guy.  You can always blame the other guy for "making" you divisive as your justification when the hypocrisy is shoved in your face so that you can't ignore it.

[Morch]

3 hours ago, Damual Travesty said:

I think he was referring to people who show up shouting at a funeral. You don't agree? And people who burn buildings and kill police officers not vile?

 

I think he was trying to paint anyone of the other side as illegitimate - to the degree of associating them with rioters, looters and arsonists. That's been a Team Trump talking point for a while now. Your last bit is just an example of the same - nothing in my post which suggest it, nothing in my posting history that does. Even the post you replied to implies the opposite.

[CorpusChristie]

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Hypocrisy says it's O.K. to be divisive as long as it's you and not the other guy.  You can always blame the other guy for "making" you divisive as your justification when the hypocrisy is shoved in your face so that you can't ignore it.

And imagine their reaction if Trump had been the one doing the jeering , I am quite sure they would then find jeering at a funeral to be a terrible thing to do

[nemo38]

6 hours ago, darksidedog said:

Yes, a whole 8 cases in the last ten years! 2010 was a particularly bad year and had six.

Given this is quoting your "evidence" can you explain to us where are the missing thousands you claim are happening?

It is helpful when people post facts, but not helpful when in defiance of the facts, incorrect rhetoric comes out. Kind of what is commonly known as fake news. The facts, even the ones you presented show that voter fraud is indeed, not a problem.

 

Mail in elections are plagued by problems

 

https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2020/09/17/more-than-35-000-mail-in-ballots-were-rejected-in-florida-primary-1317327

 

"More than 35,500 vote-by-mail ballots didn’t count in Florida’s recent primary, rejected because of missed deadlines or technical flaws, an analysis for POLITICO has found.

The rejections, which accounted for about 1.5 percent of the total vote"

 

Pennsylvania will accept mail in ballots where the signature does not match records.

 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2020/09/16/excuse-me-pennsylvania-will-accept-mailin-ballots-whose-signatures-dont-match-n2576291

 

Mail in ballots will be sent out on a mass scale

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/08/politics/california-mail-in-voting/index.html

 

This is just from one method of voter fraud

 

 

https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud

 

 

Here is a case from 2018 where they overturned the election result due to voter fraud.

 

https://www.npr.org/2019/07/30/746800630/north-carolina-gop-operative-faces-new-felony-charges-that-allege-ballot-fraud

 

Recent case of a primary where the election result is contended due to voter fraud

 

https://www.foxnews.com/media/attorney-suraj-patel-mail-in-voting-redesign-ballot-envelope

 

Have a nice day

 

[Tippaporn]

5 minutes ago, Morch said:

3 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Again, where's the evidence that Trump will?  If there's no evidence then on what basis does Biden make that assumption and then preemptively hire 600 lawyers?  Does that make sense?  Which begs the question as to whether there's another reason he's hiring 600 lawyers.  Is he creating a false narrative as cover for other intentions?

The evidence is in Trump's actions and words. Plus, not forgetting Republican Party shenanigans.

By all means provide indisputable evidence along with some quotes.  Don't bother if your going to provide interpreted evidence.  Whatever other so-called Republican shenanigans you're referring to don't carry weight as they're not related to the Trump campaign.

[Morch]

3 hours ago, CorpusChristie said:

Respect should have been shown to the deceased , they should have remined quiet .

The disrespectful people who shout at funerals are the same type of person who burn buildings and shoot policeman , they are the same group  

 

Are you now an expert on types of people, as well? Do you actually believe all these people are potential arsonists, cop killers? Just another over the top nonsense from the usual auto defense team.

[Berkshire]

42 minutes ago, Damual Travesty said:

It sounds like you our blaming the President for people making the personal decision to kill police officers. maim them, burn down buildings, destroy Government property, kill innocent civilians, the outbreak and spread of Covid-19, that you believe in permanent lock-downs and the forced wearing of masks by American Citizens. You also believe that climate change is so pressing that you favour shutting down the entire oil and gas industry because we are going to die in 12 years or so if we do not. You likewise favour a treaty that grants economic favour to China based upon our taking the Communist Party of China's word on the matter that they will not use that money to build weapons, do I have you correct on all of this or would you disagree with me. You are an American right?

Since you clearly don't have a grasp of what's really going on, perhaps I can share the comments of someone who does.  This is a top general who worked for Trump (vice Chair of the Joint Chiefs who was re-nominated by Trump) and--surprise--will be voting for Biden.

 

["Thanks to his disdainful attitude and his failures, our allies no longer trust or respect us, and our enemies no longer fear us. Climate change continues unabated, as does North Korea's nuclear program. The president has ceded influence to a Russian adversary who puts bounties on the heads of American military personnel, and his trade war against China has only harmed America's farmers and manufacturers," the letter reads.]

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/paul-selva-general-joe-biden/index.html

 

He's just one of nearly 500 former National Security leaders who support Biden.  This group is just the latest of many others. 

 

https://www.nationalsecurityleaders4biden.com/

[Morch]

3 hours ago, Damual Travesty said:

Another hateful comment of insult directed at the President of the USA,  an attempt at Propaganda for the unschooled, and not succeeding very well due the lack of nuance. It is very sad to see this here. I like to think that we are above simply posting to hurl insults.

 

A person has motivation always remember that. I have motivation for my view. I am an American Conservative who agrees with the policy of the US President because his actions effect me personally because I am an American Citizen and his actions effect my future directly. What is this person's motivation? He is a ------ who disagrees with the American President, because ------ which effects his life personally because he is a ------ what exactly is going on here?

 

Why is it that you think Trump beyond reproach? Beyond criticism? Beyond being insulted? Beyond being hated? And why is it that you do not have any issues with such things when expressed by Trump himself or his supporters?

 

How is making the point that Trump's record is dodgy a propaganda attempt? Are you in denial of all the negatives associated with him? Is he up for sainthood or something?

 

You are going nowhere with your constant nonsense comments on other posters relevance, motivation, nationality and so on. You're just trolling.

[CorpusChristie]

2 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Are you now an expert on types of people, as well? Do you actually believe all these people are potential arsonists, cop killers? Just another over the top nonsense from the usual auto defense team.

I am not an expert, but I believe that if a person is the type of person to jeer and disturb the peace at a funeral , they would also be the type of person to riot and loot .

   If a person displays an aspect of behaving badly , they are quite likely to have other aspects of bad behavior  

[Phulublub]

8 hours ago, Puchaiyank said:

Civility, reverence, and politeness never go out of style when honoring the dead..

Indeed.  What was the recent quote he made about those military who were killed in the line of duty?  Losers?  Suckers? 

 

PH

[Phulublub]

8 hours ago, Damual Travesty said:

Disgusting absolutely disgusting. Anything for power it seems.

Likedenying as many as possibel the ability to cast their vote?  Agree, disgusting.

 

PH

[CorpusChristie]

1 minute ago, Phulublub said:

Indeed.  What was the recent quote he made about those military who were killed in the line of duty?  Losers?  Suckers? 

 

PH

No, he didnt say that , fake news from the left

[CorpusChristie]

1 minute ago, Phulublub said:

Likedenying as many as possibel the ability to cast their vote?  Agree, disgusting.

 

PH

More fake news , twice now in two posts .

No one is being denied the right to vote

[Phulublub]

7 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

No, he didnt say that , fake news from the left

Fake news from the left you say?  Like Fox News?

 

https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-judge-says-he-believes-trump-called-veterans-losers-suckers-because-he-knows-him-1531089

 

Edited September 25, 2020 by Phulublub

[Phulublub]

8 minutes ago, CorpusChristie said:

No one is being denied the right to vote

So deliberately slowing down the mail, closing polling stations, insisting on street numbers when may reservations do not use them...stuff like that..is not denying?  Maybe denying is the wrong word "putting all possible obsticles in the way" may be better.

 

Your proto-dictator  is doing all he can to enable his continued occupancy of the White House by foul means.

 

PH

[Isaan sailor]

Likely approved and subsidized by George Soros.

[spidermike007]

1 hour ago, riclag said:

 For centuries ,America has made it clear the constitution  has given the sole responsibility  of nominating a SCJ to the office of the President! It's a long tradition ! 

Thank god for that despite objections from the left!

I wish they would stop dividing America and the institution 

 

Utterly fascinating how the charlatan Master has taught his disciples how to distort truth, how to learn the art of deflection, and how to embrace dishonor. And the most fascinating part is most do not even see what they are doing, nor how they are behaving. Honor? What is that? 

Edited September 25, 2020 by spidermike007

[Phulublub]

1 hour ago, CorpusChristie said:

Has Trump previously jeered at a funeral ?

Dunno.  Has anyone ever jeered at him at one?

 

PH

[simple1]

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Their conclusion is utterly subjective.  Which is why I would never rely on Snopes for anything.  They should deal with the facts as they are rather than provide their "analysis" to interpret the facts according to their left leaning bias.  That is not fact checking.  It's presenting facts with personal commentary.

 

Their only conclusion should have been that Trump did not suggest voters actually vote twice and end of story.

 

'Caught in the headlights' comes to mind. Claiming the report as truth, when challenged change your narrative. Full of it...