Jump to content

Celebrations erupt in major U.S. cities after Biden election win


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Lucky you dont support trump then, fraud on his charities, universities, bankruptcies, paying porn stars, bragging about secually assaulting women etc.

 

Who did you vote for, mickey mouse?

You guys seriously need to learn if you talk against a democrat, that does not mean you support Trump. You really cannot understand that, can you? No compute. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

You are just making stuff up. You haven't provided proof regarding being beholden to corporate interests so I'll leave it there.

In terms of the plagiarism I'll say it again.

I agree that he did it and it's not good. He made a mistake and paid the price. In 1988.

Comparing rape and plagiarism is in my mind ridiculous. To plagiarise a speech is lazy and silly but to my mind not earth shatteringly bad. I think most people would concur. 

You are picking one mistake he made and ignoring the 1000's of lies, that have much worse implications than a plagiarised speech, from Trump.

 

 

Again, not sure why you think I would need to be for Trump when I speak about Biden. You guys' eyes of the world are shut. It is not black or white. 

 

Yes, as I said, you are fine with a president who plagiarized multiple times at professional levels. He made the "mistake" multiple times, and did not seem to care to change. 

 

You said it was ok because it was in 1988. I said, why are crimes from 1988 ok? Do you have an answer? Is everything I do ok, if it was 1988 or before? It is your logic, not mine. Defend it. 

  • Sad 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Plagiarism is actually not a crime except in cases of forgery like copying official documents. Stop spreading disinformation.

It is a crime. 

 

But let's just assume for your sake it is not for now. Ok, well, I am not ok with a president who plagiarizes speeches. You are. Enough said I suppose. 

  • Sad 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

The proof isn't there. On a happy day like this I don't want to get bogged down with this sort of thing.

The worst I see is that Hunter is a bit troubled and got a job he probably didn't deserve and maybe he made claims about availability to his father he shouldn't have. No proof of Joe Biden wrongdoing.

Listen, they are all squeaky clean. They got into politics, not for money, but to help people. Sure, all this money has poured in from nowhere the higher he has gotten in office, but that is just from hard work. And, rest assured, Biden will have your best interests at heart. And make sure you know, no member of his family has benefited in any way from Biden's positions in the oval office. 

 

Typing it out is surreal. I mean I just honestly cannot believe that people buy into it. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, sucit said:

It is a crime. 

 

But let's just assume for your sake it is not for now. Ok, well, I am not ok with a president who plagiarizes speeches. You are. Enough said I suppose. 

But you were okay with a President who donated charitable funds to himself and defrauded thousands of people out of their money? Those are far worse deeds.

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, sucit said:

Again, not sure why you think I would need to be for Trump when I speak about Biden. You guys' eyes of the world are shut. It is not black or white. 

 

Yes, as I said, you are fine with a president who plagiarized multiple times at professional levels. He made the "mistake" multiple times, and did not seem to care to change. 

 

You said it was ok because it was in 1988. I said, why are crimes from 1988 ok? Do you have an answer? Is everything I do ok, if it was 1988 or before? It is your logic, not mine. Defend it. 

You seem fixated with this. I didn't say it was OK. I said people make mistakes. Some people learn from their mistakes. I believe Biden is a good man and if the worst thing he has done is this I don't see it as a major thing. Reading a speech from a similar left leaning leader and liking it's tone and using it is a mistake but really do you think it should stop someone moving on with their life.  

On the day of his acceptance speech if this is your biggest concern then that's fine.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
15 minutes ago, sucit said:

It is a crime. 

 

But let's just assume for your sake it is not for now. Ok, well, I am not ok with a president who plagiarizes speeches. You are. Enough said I suppose. 

Prove that it's a crime.

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, sucit said:

You guys seriously need to learn if you talk against a democrat, that does not mean you support Trump. You really cannot understand that, can you? No compute. 

Given your double standards why should we assume otherwise?

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Tug said:

Did anyone see der spegils magazine cover?they show trumps 1th day in office be heading lady liberty today’s cover shows joe Biden putting it back perhaps some computer savvy guy or gal could show it here I don’t know how anyway it’s a striking image and imo so true 

????

Google  der spegil - it is hilarious indeed.

Don't want to post it here, because not sure if I get a holiday for that!

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Back up your allegations. What did Biden do in his capacity as a senator or vice president to enrich himself? Stop spreading lies.

Agreed. From what I can read in the media,  Biden literally wanted to save democracy. I don't think in his age, he is bothered about money too much. Probably he'd himself prefer just to enjoy his well deserved retirement. Yes, he surely made some mistakes during his career, but sometimes the job just comes to the man... 

  • Like 1
Posted

In a way it's maybe good that so many bars are quiet/closed in Pattaya etc.

Can you imagine the boring and mind boggling conversations/arguements that would be going on.

There wouldn't be any 'discussing' going on, and for sure punch ups to follow.

Did I just forecast what's going to happen in a few places in a country with the 'right to bear arms' or should that be the 'right to arm bears'?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...