Jump to content

Sweden's pandemic experiment ends amid spiking coronavirus cases


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ExpatOilWorker said:

 

The outdoor lifestyle in Thailand's +30 C climate might be a big factor in the limited spread of the virus here.

 

https://www.dhs.gov/science-and-technology/sars-calculator

 

 

Screenshot_20201216-095720_Chrome.jpg

I agree.Maybe they should lock people outside and see how that goes!Locking people inside doesn't seem to have any statistically relevant impact as yet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Yeah, trying to compare dust to water droplets is such an easy stretch! :cheesy:

Do you deny that the virus is airborne and floats in the air?I didn't take you for a denier Jeff you need to keep up to date and try for some more recent research.Look into the sky and see the clouds made of tiny (some not so tiny) water droplets floating in the breeze for many a mile!

Edited by FarFlungFalang
Link to comment
20 minutes ago, FarFlungFalang said:

Do you deny that the virus is airborne and floats in the air?I didn't take you for a denier Jeff you need to keep up to date and try for some more recent research.Look into the sky and see the clouds made of tiny (some not so tiny) water droplets floating in the breeze for many a mile!

Stop denying the severity of this pandemic, the proven help of the mask, etc.  You're not going to win that argument.

Link to comment
1 minute ago, Jeffr2 said:

You're not aware of that?

I am aware of that Jeff but you seem to be suggesting that it isn't.Someone suggested earlier that the virus needs to be in water droplets to travel any distance and suggests that the distance it can travel is short but it turns out that it can travel in water vapour from our breath and can travel much further than previously admitted.You erroneously suggested that I was comparing droplets to dust when I was comparing water vapour to dust which is a better analogy to make than a grain of rice or a droplet of water.If the virus is carried in water vapour it makes it much harder for masks to be effective which is why people wearing masks are still getting infected and infecting others whilst wearing masks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, FarFlungFalang said:

I am aware of that Jeff but you seem to be suggesting that it isn't.Someone suggested earlier that the virus needs to be in water droplets to travel any distance and suggests that the distance it can travel is short but it turns out that it can travel in water vapour from our breath and can travel much further than previously admitted.You erroneously suggested that I was comparing droplets to dust when I was comparing water vapour to dust which is a better analogy to make than a grain of rice or a droplet of water.If the virus is carried in water vapour it makes it much harder for masks to be effective which is why people wearing masks are still getting infected and infecting others whilst wearing masks.

It's been shown that un-inhaled cigarette smoke is almost identical in size and size distribution to respired particles from our lungs (see link). Most are smaller that 1μm peaking about 0.25μm. So, light a cigarette, set it in an ashtray and watch the smoke. Wave your hand in the air. How long does smoke hang in the air?

 

The aerosol probably evaporates very quickly and becomes even lighter. That's why I will wear a mask even in an empty lift. Someone stood there breathing before me. 

 

So airborne will make a pandemic worse and requires better masks. Even so, sneezes are probably still a major transmission vector.

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0095852260900374

Edited by rabas
  • Like 2
Link to comment
2 hours ago, FarFlungFalang said:

I agree with the following quote from one of the linked articles.

 

"Carroll cautions that this was not a randomized, controlled study and there could have been other factors at play (such as more physical distancing in social situations and fewer large gatherings) in the counties that were enforcing masks."

 

Yes. They probably do help, but possibly not in the way people think.  I still think it's more behavioral- it predicts someone who is aware of the need for good personal standards, and this person will be more mindful of social distancing, etc, and won't be out and about if he has any sort of infection.  Worth doing imo but I believe it is really not a very significant factor in this pandemic, when compared with quarantine and social distancing.

 

 

Edited by mommysboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, mommysboy said:

 

Yes. They probably do help, but possibly not in the way people think.  I still think it's more behavioral- it predicts someone who is aware of the need for good personal standards, and this person will be more mindful of social distancing, etc, and won't be out and about if he has any sort of infection.  Worth doing imo but I believe it is really not a very significant factor in this pandemic, when compared with quarantine and social distancing.

The CDC, WHO and pretty much every medical expert don't agree with you.  Same with Sweden, thus, their turnaround on this issue.

 

Masks work.  Wear them.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment

All this debate about the effectiveness of masks on an individual level is trumped by numerous epidemiological studies which show their effectiveness in protecting others. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219391/

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341363533_Epidemiology_reveals_mask_wearing_by_the_public_is_crucial_for_COVID-19_control

  • Like 1
Link to comment
4 hours ago, rabas said:

The aerosol probably evaporates very quickly and becomes even lighter. That's why I will wear a mask even in an empty lift. Someone stood there breathing before me. 

You are still sucking in air and anything in that air including lungful of viral load as the mask may catch some but most will just flow with the air going into your lungs.Like Mrs Marsh was fond of saying "like liquid into chalk it gets in".

Link to comment
31 minutes ago, placeholder said:

All this debate about the effectiveness of masks on an individual level is trumped by numerous epidemiological studies which show their effectiveness in protecting others. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219391/

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341363533_Epidemiology_reveals_mask_wearing_by_the_public_is_crucial_for_COVID-19_control

Lots of guessing in those studies of infection curves and numbers which show nothing but make some rather large assumptions and draw some anecdotal conclusions.I didn't see any mention of these studies being peer reviewed either so I would put to much stock into these studies too many long bows being drawn.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
2 hours ago, FarFlungFalang said:

Lots of guessing in those studies of infection curves and numbers which show nothing but make some rather large assumptions and draw some anecdotal conclusions.I didn't see any mention of these studies being peer reviewed either so I would put to much stock into these studies too many long bows being drawn.

First off, here's  a link to the peer review certification

PLOS ONE: Mask or no mask for COVID-19: A public health and market study

Here's a link to another peer reviewed study

Association of Country-wide Coronavirus Mortality with Demographics, Testing, Lockdowns, and Public Wearing of Masks | The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ajtmh.org)

 

 

Link to comment

In Sweden, Infections and Calls for a Lockdown Are Rising

Intensive-care beds in hospitals in the Stockholm region are all currently occupied, Bjorn Eriksson, a regional health director, said at a news conference on Tuesday.

“We are far beyond 100 percent of capacity in intensive care. We are approaching almost double the number of available spaces,” he said.

In Sweden, Infections and Calls for a Lockdown Are Rising - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

Edited by Scott
  • Like 2
Link to comment
On 12/8/2020 at 10:14 AM, cooked said:

Everyone who is going to get Covid is going to get covid sooner or later. They will all become 'cases', very few will die. Remember that this was supposed to be about not overloading the health services? I believe that all the emergency hospitals that were built or shipped in initially (UK, USA, China and Russia off hand) have been removed. 

Meanwhile, for some mysterious reason, deaths from 'flu complications have virtually disappeared. 

 

To not forget a lack of pneumonia deaths too, usually around 5 million a year.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
7 hours ago, ChaiyaTH said:

To not forget a lack of pneumonia deaths too, usually around 5 million a year.

 

Incorrect - check with WHO - annual flu deaths are approx 500k p.a. worldwide. In less than a year Covid deaths have now reached approx 1.65 million worldwide

  • Like 2
Link to comment
13 hours ago, FarFlungFalang said:

Lots of guessing in those studies of infection curves and numbers which show nothing but make some rather large assumptions and draw some anecdotal conclusions.I didn't see any mention of these studies being peer reviewed either so I would put to much stock into these studies too many long bows being drawn.

As said by a classic covid denier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
8 hours ago, placeholder said:

In Sweden, Infections and Calls for a Lockdown Are Rising

Intensive-care beds in hospitals in the Stockholm region are all currently occupied, Bjorn Eriksson, a regional health director, said at a news conference on Tuesday.

“We are far beyond 100 percent of capacity in intensive care. We are approaching almost double the number of available spaces,” he said.

In Sweden, Infections and Calls for a Lockdown Are Rising - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

But, but, but...we need our freedom!  Let the elderly and sick sit in basements while we go out and play!

Link to comment
3 hours ago, oompie69 said:

Come on! You know this is an inconvenient fact to mention. It spoils the whole narrative. 

Facts are things that are true. But it is false to contend that every winter Sweden's ICU capacity is stretched to its limit. What' more this year the Stockholm region is stretched to beyond its limit as the health director of the region has revealed.

Link to comment

Here's an interesting opinion piece from a Swedish writer offering an explanation of why the Swedes adopted such a bone-headed approach and why they have stuck to it for so long.

 

 

Why did Sweden adopt this approach, and why was it not rapidly abandoned in April when it was clear that our neighbors were doing far better than we were? 

 

While there are many reasons, I believe a significant part of the answer lies in Swedish exceptionalism. Whereas American exceptionalism is about America’s unique place in the world, Swedish exceptionalism is about being immune to any disasters that may happen in the rest of the world.

 

To understand this idea, you need to understand our history: We survived two world wars unscathed, two wars in which all of our neighbors were partially or completely occupied. While every generation of Americans has suffered at least one major war, Sweden has not fought a war since 1814. The last time Sweden engaged in armed conflict, James Madison was president of the United States. 

 

https://thedispatch.com/p/covid-19-and-the-failure-of-swedish

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...
""