Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, sungod said:

He got covid, we got that. Is he sick?

We don't actually know how he's doing. The guy isn't exactly forthcoming with information about himself. He refuses to say whether or not he's been vaccinated.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, placeholder said:

What do you mean I don't have any information. Kory confessed that he got sick from covid. The same guy who claimed that "If you take Ivermectin, you won't get sick."

 

You just said you dont know how he is doing, make your mind up.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 2
Posted
1 minute ago, sungod said:

You just said you dont know how he is doing, make your mind up.

He may still be suffering from the symptoms of long covid. Or he may have ahd long covid and now is better. Who knows?

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Airalee said:

Nowhere in your linked article, or any others out there did I read that he “got sick”.  So your fear mongering is based upon pure speculation that you cannot prove.   
 

If his statement was that “you cannot contract Covid” then you might have a point.  But it wasn’t.  So, from what I can see, he could very well have been correct with his statement.

"Pierre Kory, MD, one of the most vocal proponents of ivermectin, got COVID-19 in August."

Covid-19 is not the virus. 

"COVID-19 is the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that emerged in December 2019."

https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus

If you got a problem with that definition, take it up with Johns Hopkins.

Edited by placeholder
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Airalee said:

Maybe if he didn’t take it he would have gotten sicker.  Nobody knows.  Studies are needed.

As for studies are needed...

Here's a link to an article written by a medical researcher doing medical forensics. In this case he and authors examined the quality of various studies done on ivermectin. He noticed a trend...the higher the quality of a study, the less likely it was to support the case for Ivermectin.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/10/ivermectin-research-problems/620473/

Edited by placeholder
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Anyway, I'm sure now that once Ivermectin believers check out the veracity of this report, they will at least question their faith in it and the competence of Pierre Kory, MD.

 

Why would you think that?  The absence of any credible facts / evidence / reality hasn't stopped those kinds of folks from continuing to believe and advocate all kinds of absurd rubbish and misinformation.  Don't see that changing any time soon.

 

What happens when actual medical / scientific research challenges/refutes their unsubstantiated beliefs?

 

"When COVID research results in findings that people don't like, it may lead to ugliness directed at the researchers.

Shortly after presenting the [ivermectin] study, McMaster University researcher Edward Mills said he got death threats.

 

“Some people are very unhappy about the findings,” said Mills, a professor of health research methods, evidence and impact. “They believe the drug worked. It has kind of shaken their belief system. It makes them angry.”

 

Death threats were received by 15% of 321 responding scientists in several countries, including the U.S., who responded to an October survey conducted by the journal Nature. The scientists had given media interviews about COVID. Another 22% said they got threats of physical or sexual violence."

 

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/2021/11/15/ivermectin-covid-sen-ron-johnson-medical-conspiracy-theory-aaron-rodgers-covid-19-pierre-kory/8473964002/

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I linked to an article by an MD who does forensic research. He is highly qualified to pronounce on those studies. Yes there were a lot of studies. And most of them, according to him,  were quite shoddy. 

As he pointed out, just because an study gets published in a journal, that doesn't mean it's much of one. Lots of journals exist only to allow people to burnish their resumes. These journals are called open source. They actually charge the authors of a study in return for publishing their work. The best journals are supported solely by subscriptions or an endowment.

So hundreds and thousands of research for iver for multiple viruses done for 20-30 years around the world by hundreds of universities and hospitals gets invalidated by an article by some doctor whom you fully trust. 
so maybe try to search only on those trusted by you websites. Problem is, to get an access to those articles you need to pay in $$$$, so not really a solution for me. But do post some summaries proving by them that iver really doesn't work for any viruses and it's just an academic hoax. 
if there are junk research for iver, surely there must be some rebuttal in those quality subscription mags

Edited by internationalism
  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...