Jump to content

Vote for the UK government to index link pensions in Thailand


webfact

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

I'd vote against most of those people getting benefits, if there wasn't so many spongers then maybe UK could afford to pay a decent pension

Yes, watching the UK news (as I do) does not bring out the most compassionate thoughts from me too!  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theoldgit said:

I think you're spot on, in fact some would say that we shouldn't even receive a State Pension, it's been said to me.

Yes, there will be that perspective... if ever that was to come about many would have to return and then the burden would be back on the UK, on the NHS, and on the benefits system as many would qualify for further monies. 

Not much to go back to there though. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

Having got involuntary trapped in the UK for 19 months getting benefits is so near to being impossible I very much doubt there are many spongers left after the draconian sanctions for any infringement are levied .

 

If the rich pay their tax Like Rishi's Mrs should have done for the last 10 years maybe UK could afford to pay a decent pension????

If you keep low savings and no property the benefits should flow easy enough, those in the benefit areas will know exactly how to work the system

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, theoldgit said:

 

I think you're spot on, in fact some would say that we shouldn't even receive a State Pension, it's been said to me.

 

I also believe that this view is one of the reasons Ministers, of all persuasions, feel comfortable rolling out the same old lame excuse as they've done for years.

 

I do remind people in the UK that I pay hundreds of pounds a month in income tax on my combined pensions, and save the country money by not receiving winter fuel allowance, Christmas bonus, a bus pass and access to the NHS, so I would argue that I pay my fair share to the UK economy.

 

My State Pension is £116 per week, about 5,100 Baht.

Paid in full and I get somewhat less than you. Don't see anything ever changing, at least not in my time. And ,yes, I have signed petitions don't wan't it to be said I haven't tried! ????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

How did you arrive at that figure?

using my figures above, so 1st year increase of 2.9% of the op's £179.50 would be £5.38, new pension £184.88, 2nd year 2.5% of £184.88 is £4.62 so now pension is £189.50,  3rd year 3% is £5.68 so now pension is £194.18, 4th year 2.6% is £5.04 so now pension is £199.22, 5th year 3.9% is £7.76 so now pension is £206.98, 6th year 2.5% is £5.17 so now pension is £212.15, 7the year (this year) is 3.1% is £6.57 so now pension is £218.71, i was 8p out in my post, op started with a bigger than most weekly pension. i may have something wrong, is so i apologise.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, steve187 said:

using my figures above, so 1st year increase of 2.9% of the op's £179.50 would be £5.38, new pension £184.88, 2nd year 2.5% of £184.88 is £4.62 so now pension is £189.50,  3rd year 3% is £5.68 so now pension is £194.18, 4th year 2.6% is £5.04 so now pension is £199.22, 5th year 3.9% is £7.76 so now pension is £206.98, 6th year 2.5% is £5.17 so now pension is £212.15, 7the year (this year) is 3.1% is £6.57 so now pension is £218.71, i was 8p out in my post, op started with a bigger than most weekly pension. i may have something wrong, is so i apologise.

Very kind to explain......but how does this tally with the stated UK state pension max currently being £175.20 pw?.......am I missing something (don't be rude...555)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Happy to be corrected, but I consider myself a UK resident and entitled to pension increases. 

 

I own a property in the UK and spend more than 30 days a year in it........anyone else doing the same?

Just staying in the UK for 30 days pa isn't enough to make "Ordinarily Resident", there's a lot more to it than that, check out the Ordinarily Resident tool so see how you fare. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/help-for-nhs-to-recover-costs-of-care-from-visitors-and-migrants/settled-purpose-tool#:~:text=Is their stay in the,in another country of residence.

 

I've been non-resident for 15 years & take great care to maintain this as it lowers the amount of tax on dividend income & means I don't have to pay Capital Gains Tax on any share sales (I will need to pay it when I come to sell my house). 

 

Fortunately my state pension still increases each year as I'm 11 years away from being able to claim it, time will tell if things are still the same then.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mike Teavee said:

Just staying in the UK for 30 days pa isn't enough to make "Ordinarily Resident", there's a lot more to it than that, check out the Ordinarily Resident tool so see how you fare. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/help-for-nhs-to-recover-costs-of-care-from-visitors-and-migrants/settled-purpose-tool#:~:text=Is their stay in the,in another country of residence.

 

I've been non-resident for 15 years & take great care to maintain this as it lowers the amount of tax on dividend income & means I don't have to pay Capital Gains Tax on any share sales (I will need to pay it when I come to sell my house). 

 

Fortunately my state pension still increases each year as I'm 11 years away from being able to claim it, time will tell if things are still the same then.

God this is all so confusing......I thought being non-resident just meant you didn't have to pay tax to the UK on foreign earnings (or is that what you meant?).....but you are still taxed the same as any UK resident on all UK earnings????

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mike Teavee said:

Just staying in the UK for 30 days pa isn't enough to make "Ordinarily Resident", there's a lot more to it than that, check out the Ordinarily Resident tool so see how you fare. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/help-for-nhs-to-recover-costs-of-care-from-visitors-and-migrants/settled-purpose-tool#:~:text=Is their stay in the,in another country of residence.

 

I've been non-resident for 15 years & take great care to maintain this as it lowers the amount of tax on dividend income & means I don't have to pay Capital Gains Tax on any share sales (I will need to pay it when I come to sell my house). 

 

Fortunately my state pension still increases each year as I'm 11 years away from being able to claim it, time will tell if things are still the same then.

Thanks for that, but that relates to NHS care not whether or not your are ordinarily resident of tax purposes.

 

3.2 Second automatic UK test

 

You’ll be UK resident for the tax year if you have, or have had, a home in the UK for all or part of the year and the following all apply:

there is or was at least one period of 91 consecutive days when you had a home in the UK

at least 30 of these 91 days fall in the tax year when you have a home in the UK and you’ve been present in that home for at least 30 days at any time during the year

at that time you had no overseas home, or if you had an overseas home, you were present in it for fewer than 30 days in the tax year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Will B Good said:

God this is all so confusing......I thought being non-resident just meant you didn't have to pay tax to the UK on foreign earnings (or is that what you meant?).....but you are still taxed the same as any UK resident on all UK earnings????

 

 

You are always liable tor Tax on UK earnings (E.g. interest on bank accounts, rental income etc...) irrespective of where you live or your tax status, but being non-resident you don't have to pay Capital Gains Tax on the sale of (non-property) assets & tax on dividend is capped at the amount that's already been paid so should this income push you into a higher tax bracket, you don't need to pay the additional tax [NB I'm not 100% sure on this part anymore as it's a long time since my UK Income would put me in the higher rate tax bracket & they changed the rules a while back],

 

Oh & you're not allowed to put anymore money into any tax free savings (e.g. ISAs) - You can keep what you have but cannot pay anymore into them. 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jacko45k said:

As far as we know she has paid all the taxes the law requires of her.... 

That's ok then makes you wonder what all the fuss is about then or why she now has agreed to give up her non dom status allegedly ???? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Will B Good said:

Thanks for that, but that relates to NHS care not whether or not your are ordinarily resident of tax purposes.

Yes, as we were talking about frozen State Pensions. I figured the Ordinarily Resident test used by DHS would be the more appropriate.  

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jacko45k said:

Yeah, have plenty children, money will flow in and no need to work. Can go glue yourself to power stations and roads and generally make a nuisance of yourself in the absence of having a productive job!

You really have no clue as to how the benefits system now works there is a thing called a benefit cap have a go at your theory to see if it still works ???? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I wasn't married to a Thai national who wishes to live in her home until she dies?  I personally would not be living in Thailand.  Spain, The PI, or Mexico would have been my retirement options.  Hell, even your own country doesn't want you to live here.  So I don't personally see why people actually chose to retire here given the lack of respect that highly nationalistic Thais have for foreigners and expats - and your own country for that matter.
Really - why stay?

Edited by connda
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, webfact said:

If we can reach 10,000 signatures by May 29th then the government must respond to this petition. 

And the response will be a cut and paste of the last time they responded to one of these fatuous petitions, which only give the mandarins an excuse to advise ministers that there is no significant support for any change to the status quo.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...