Jump to content

Truss surges ahead, wins key backers in U.K. leadership race for prime minister


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I doubt the winner of the leadership contest will call an early election, the party is split down the middle and the candidates are each either side of that split.

 

 

Yep, bit like the Labour Party at the mo, Unions, oh well......????

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunak after being a notably prolific spender as the Chancellor professed at the start of his campaign, to be a careful PM who would be sure to delay tax cuts until the UK had started balancing it's books . . .

 

Thereby he sealed his fate ! He may have been quite right but a hard pressed electorate want tax cuts NOW !

 

Bye bye Rishi ?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TorquayFan said:

Sunak after being a notably prolific spender as the Chancellor professed at the start of his campaign, to be a careful PM who would be sure to delay tax cuts until the UK had started balancing it's books . . .

 

Thereby he sealed his fate ! He may have been quite right but a hard pressed electorate want tax cuts NOW !

 

Bye bye Rishi ?

 

 

Its the members of the Conservative party who will be casting the vote though , nothing to do with the electorate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sawadee1947 said:

For me it sounds crazy that not even 200000 old people will decide who's next PM.

What stupid kind of democracy is that??????

A parliamentary democracy, not a presidential one. The public select their MP, not the Prime Minister. 

But yes, there is a lot of discussion about it out there.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RayC said:
35 minutes ago, TorquayFan said:

Sunak after being a notably prolific spender as the Chancellor professed at the start of his campaign, to be a careful PM who would be sure to delay tax cuts until the UK had started balancing it's books . . .

 

Thereby he sealed his fate ! He may have been quite right but a hard pressed electorate want tax cuts NOW !

 

Bye bye Rishi ?

 

 

Expand  

Trusses' campaign is based purely on the worse type of populism.

 

Talk tough about dealing with the EU to get the ERG supporters on-board. This, in itself, is probably irrelevant. Reality will bite when/if negotiations with the EU recommence, and she will have no choice but to soften her stance.

I don't think she will. I don't think she can. Maintaining bad relations with the EU is one of the pillars keeping the edifice standing. The ERG simply wouldn't accept it and the rest of the party seem terrified of them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, baboon said:

A parliamentary democracy, not a presidential one. The public select their MP, not the Prime Minister. 

But yes, there is a lot of discussion about it out there.

But this doesn't work in the current situation.

200000 can hardly represent 80 millions. And those 200000 are much older than the average citizen. 

Why not new election?? The Tories are too much afraid to lose? Obviously!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sawadee1947 said:

For me it sounds crazy that not even 200000 old people will decide who's next PM.

What stupid kind of democracy is that??????

It’s the one we have always had. We don’t vote directly for PM. 
We had a perfectly acceptable PM who was voted in by a landslide election win. Very undemocratically, he was ousted by the losing opposition, combined MSM, and a few opportunist back stabbers. How stupid is that?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Loiner said:

It’s the one we have always had. We don’t vote directly for PM. 
We had a perfectly acceptable PM who was voted in by a landslide election win. Very undemocratically, he was ousted by the losing opposition, combined MSM, and a few opportunist back stabbers. How stupid is that?

He was ousted by his own party and was the worst Prime Minister we have ever had.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sawadee1947 said:

But this doesn't work in the current situation.

200000 can hardly represent 80 millions. And those 200000 are much older than the average citizen. 

Why not new election?? The Tories are too much afraid to lose? Obviously!

Yes, probably so. However they will just point the finger at the Blair / Brown succession (not unreasonably).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, baboon said:

And so another thread is ruined for anyone actually wanting a sensible discussion.

Would that be the type of sensible discussion where you resort to allegations of libel and calling everybody liars?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, baboon said:

Yes, probably so. However they will just point the finger at the Blair / Brown succession (not unreasonably).

It's embarrassing to watch.

First the clown and now cheating the whole country again instead of new elections?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sawadee1947 said:

It's embarrassing to watch.

First the clown and now cheating the whole country again instead of new elections?

You'll get no argument from me...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sawadee1947 said:

It's embarrassing to watch.

First the clown and now cheating the whole country again instead of new elections?

So, you would like it if the rules were not followed (cheating) and the current election result was ignore and there were new elections in the hope that the Political party that you support is elected ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...