Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.jpeg
 

The nature of the decision by the constitutional court last Wednesday might have been unexpected for many people, as it ordered Prayut Chan-o-cha to cease performing his duties as prime minister while the matter of his 8-years tenure is considered by the court.

 

A legal expert says that, although people may want the answer now, the earliest the country will get it from the court is in 30 days. There is a 15-day window of opportunity for Prayut to submit evidence and documentation to support his case and another 15 days or more for the court’s deliberations.

 

“The constitutional court allows General Prayut 15 days to present whatever he has as,” said Associate

Professor Dr.Jade Donavanik of the Faculty of Law at the College of Asian Scholars, adding “So within 15 days, they might be taking on the legal issues relating to this particular aspect of General Prayut staying for 8 years, whether it is counted from 2014, 2017, or 2019. So, they can prepare. Once General Prayut submits the facts that he sees fit, then I think, in another 15 days, the Constitutional Court should be able to come up with the wording or the decision”.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/verdict-on-prayuts-tenure-in-30-days-soonest/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2022-08-29
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

Monthly car subscription with first-class insurance, 24x7 assistance and more in one price - click here to find out more!

  • Sad 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Reigntax said:

That should give Prawit 30 days to screen test to become the penguin in the next Batman film

Actually I think he looks more like Boss Nass from Star Wars !

  • Haha 2
Posted
59 minutes ago, AhFarangJa said:

I was led to believe, maybe wrongly, that when he took his second term he resigned from the army. If so why is he still referred to as General.

Ex military can retain the rank title.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MICHAEL DAVID STREET said:

Why is he still wearing army uniform if he resigned?

Still not worn them out, even the seat of the pants!

  • Haha 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, sambum said:

But we still can have an opinion - which is partly what this forum is all for.

I prefer to have an opinion on what would affect me, but each to their own, I guess. 

Posted
2 hours ago, AhFarangJa said:

I was led to believe, maybe wrongly, that when he took his second term he resigned from the army. If so why is he still referred to as General.

Same as expired US Presidents are still addressed as President. What is said sometimes doesn't reflect reality. It's a strange world.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, sambum said:

So if something doesn't affect you, you don't have an opinion on it?

And surely, a change in leadership/government in the country you are (presumably) living in could affect you - in numerous ways?

As I said before, referring to the prime minister, there's probably nothing I could do about it. I'm too old to join rallies nowadays. 

Posted
1 minute ago, stephenterry said:

As I said before, referring to the prime minister, there's probably nothing I could do about it. I'm too old to join rallies nowadays. 

But you can still have an opinion about something knowing that it has little chance of directly altering anything - nobody is suggesting you join a rally, but by voicing an opinion, you let people know which side of the fence you sit on!

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, sambum said:

But you can still have an opinion about something knowing that it has little chance of directly altering anything - nobody is suggesting you join a rally, but by voicing an opinion, you let people know which side of the fence you sit on!

Is that so. If there's something I could resolve there's no need to worry, and if there's something I cannot resolve there's no need to worry. 

Posted
9 hours ago, webfact said:

The nature of the decision by the constitutional court last Wednesday might have been unexpected for many people, as it ordered Prayut Chan-o-cha to cease performing his duties as prime minister while the matter of his 8-years tenure is considered by the court.

Should have all been sorted out with a new PM before his expiry date.

This is the usual "after the event" re-active thing Thailand does best.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, nchuckle said:

It takes 30 days to count up to 8 starting with 2014? The maths here is worse than I thought! ???? 

No that only takes 7 but the remaining 21 is to count the contents of the expected envelopes 

Posted
4 hours ago, nchuckle said:

It takes 30 days to count up to 8 starting with 2014? The maths here is worse than I thought! ???? 

There are 3 different dates  2014-2017-2019 . 

Prayut will  for sure Argue in court that he started officially in 2019. 

 

 However, the start date of the eight-year limit remains a key legal question. Is it when Prayut assumed his post in 2014, when the current Constitution came into force on April 6, 2017, or when Prayut was appointed by royal command as PM on June 9, 2019, after the general election in March that year.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, MICHAEL DAVID STREET said:

Why is he still wearing army uniform if he resigned?

He is often seen in the standard (khaki) Civil Service uniform and the formal dress whites Civil Service uniform. Images of him wearing Army uniforms are old. There will be special occasions that he is permitted and expected to wear his former military uniform and that applies to all veterans.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...