snoop1130 Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 BANGKOK, Sept 20 (TNA) – The cabinet resolved to delay a third-phase increase in the sugary drink tax for six months to avoid worsening financial burdens on people. Finance Minister Arkhom Termpittayapaisith said the tax hike would be postponed from Oct 1 this year to March 31 next year to curb the cost of living. Otherwise, the private sector would pass the bigger tax burden on to consumers. Full Story: https://tna.mcot.net/english-news-1021503 -- © Copyright Thai News Agency 2022-09-20 - Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here. Monthly car subscription with first-class insurance, 24x7 assistance and more in one price - click here to find out more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ChrisY1 Posted September 20, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted September 20, 2022 Would this have much to do with CPF owning thousands of rai of cane farms....well..of course not! 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post pattjock Posted September 20, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted September 20, 2022 It would make sense if it was a tax on rice, vegetables, eggs, pork or chicken. To delay a tax on Coca-Cola is just ridiculous. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkshire Tea Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 (edited) Surely the tax hike is to deter people from drinking too much sugary drinks, so the high price would be good! Edited September 20, 2022 by Yorkshire Tea 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CrunchWrapSupreme Posted September 20, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted September 20, 2022 Way too much sugar in the bottled teas, I'd say about 100% too much. You could water them down with a bottled water of the same size, and the resulting mixture would then have about the proper sweetness. Hah. Years ago, on my out from school, I ran into one of the parents who happened to speak English, wanting to meet the new farang. We chatted a bit and I ran the above sentiment by them, with which he strongly concurred. He was convinced that the massive sugar in the drinks was a govt plot to dumb down the nation's kids, as studies have shown that it lowers IQ levels, and thus they're banned from his house. I saw no reason to disagree. 2 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 Considering the damage caused by this addictive substance, the silence from all the "concerned members" is actually deafening when compared to the current debate on cannabis, Where are all the horror stories and the peer reviewed evidence relating to sugar ? Where are all the people worrying about its detrimental effects on the youth, Its not like the evidence doesn't exist, and there is no shortage of diseases for which it is responsible, diabetes is a horrible chronic disease and tooth decay is also highly unpleasant and irreversible . Sugar is not needed in any food but for some reason it is added to all food , why is this happening and why is it allowed ?? I would imagine that the damage caused by sugar is a bigger burden on society than the damage caused by all illegal drugs put together Sugar should be banned as a food additive and should only be allowed for use in the production of alcohol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 2 hours ago, Yorkshire Tea said: Surely the tax hike is to deter people from drinking too much sugary drinks, so the high price would be good! no need to tax it just ban it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 2 hours ago, pattjock said: It would make sense if it was a tax on rice, vegetables, eggs, pork or chicken. To delay a tax on Coca-Cola is just ridiculous. Yet somewhat predictable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 2 hours ago, ChrisY1 said: Would this have much to do with CPF owning thousands of rai of cane farms....well..of course not! that is just a coincidence , of course. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bday Prang Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 On the whole it is a very good example of how the vested interests of large companies and certain individuals take precedence over public health. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed strong Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 Perhaps Buddhas diabetes isn't as bad as they first thought. The red Fantas will be continued to be donated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikebell Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 14 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The cabinet resolved to delay a third-phase increase in the sugary drink tax for six months to as a mark of gratitude to the big companies contributing to their retirement fund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iamfalang Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Obesity is NOT a problem you clowns!!!! Obesity results in people making BILLIONS........capitalism and addiction at work! This planet is full of weak - minded sheep who put sugar on the top of icing because a cake isn't a cake without a glass of liquid cane sugar. Sugar will help me for minutes....then I crash...more sugar is there!!! if we cared about humans, we would act.......but then who would go to the hospitals?!!!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwinchester Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 "I would imagine that the damage caused by sugar is a bigger burden on society than the damage caused by all illegal drugs put together Sugar should be banned as a food additive and should only be allowed for use in the production of alcohol" Alcohol is also a bigger burden on society than the damage caused by all illegal drugs put together as well. If you want to totally ban sugar makes sense to ban alcohol too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacko45k Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 6 minutes ago, edwinchester said: Alcohol is also a bigger burden on society than the damage caused by all illegal drugs put together as well. If you want to totally ban sugar makes sense to ban alcohol too. Why stop there? Kill off a few more industries deemed burdens that generate billions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The cabinet resolved to delay a third-phase increase in the sugary drink tax for six months to avoid worsening financial burdens on people It's for their health... but hey ho, let the hospitals sort out the trouble later down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KhunLA Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Good, higher taxes on sugary drinks & cigs, as I don't use. ME ME ME ... lower the tax on alcohol, or at least freeze it ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edwinchester Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 1 hour ago, jacko45k said: Why stop there? Kill off a few more industries deemed burdens that generate billions! I was responding to his call on a total sugar ban and what some may see as a logical follow on with the banning on alcohol. Personally I would not want to see the banning of either just the encouragement of moderate and healthy consumption. A tax rate on both is part of that encouragement. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoshowJones Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 1 hour ago, hotchilli said: It's for their health... but hey ho, let the hospitals sort out the trouble later down the road. If the biggest majority of people started to look after their health. no smoking, moderate alcohol. moderate sugar intake. exercise regularly, etc, etc, what would that do to the bigwigs in the medical professions offshore bank accounts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Bill Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 20 hours ago, ChrisY1 said: Would this have much to do with CPF owning thousands of rai of cane farms. with respect, to my knowledge the CP group is not a major player in Thailand's sugar industry. Where I lived in Isaan, everything linked to sugar was owned by the Mitr Phol Company, which must now be "rubbing its hands"! Reference Wikipedia: Mitr Phol Sugar Corp is a privately owned group of companies, mainly owned by the Vongkusolkit family..........Mitr Phol is ranked as the world's fifth largest sugar producer,[2] and the largest producer in Asia.......... It is Thailand's largest sugar producer and the second largest in China.......... Mitr Phol has operations and investments in Lao PDR, Cambodia, and most recently Australia. In Thailand, Mitr Phol has six sugar mills, .....................The locations are: Suphan Buri Province (Mitr Phol Danchang mill) Sing Buri Province (Sing Buri mill) Chaiyaphum Province (Mitr Phol Phu Khieo mill) Khon Kaen Province (Mitr Phol Phu Viang mill) Kalasin Province (Mitr Phol Kalasin mill) Loei Province (Mitr Phol Phu Luang mill) Khon Kaen Province (Ban Phai Bio-Hub Industrial Estate) (under construction) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now