Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So the inevitable happened after the Mrs and daughter caught Covid. Two days later I came down with it and I knew, that like them, I would need Antiviral medicine to treat it especially being an "at risk" patient.

 

As you can only get these Antiviral medicines from a hospital and not a pharmacy I had to go to a hospital to get the medication. I rang Pattaya City Hospital to see if they could dispense the medication - yes they said come now.

 

So I dragged myself out of my sick bed and went to Pattaya City Hospital. I had to wait outside in the heat (with a temperature) while I went through the rigmarole of go this queue then go that queue etc until eventually I saw the doctor who told me she would prescribe antiviral medication for me as I was in the at risk group and I needed to take this medication. (I already knew this and was at the hospital as its the only place I can get it, I fully expected to pay for it but I could not get it from anywhere else but a hospital).

 

So I'm now in the queue waiting for my medication when I get called back to the doctor.

 

"sorry Mr,  Big Boss says I cannot give Antiviral medicine to Farang. Have to go Pharmacy. I write what medicine you need for you"

 

If I had not been feeling so ill and having not slept all night I would have unleashed a verbal tirade on her that would have made the galees in Soi Buakhaow blush. 

 

I was then charged 620b for some paracetamol and cough medicine I could have got at any pharmacy for far less. Then, knowing full well that I needed Antiviral medication I was sent away to go to a "pharmacy" which I already know cannot supply them.

 

So after this experience and "treatment" at the hands of a Thai Government hospital I was wondering. 

 

IS THIS THE TRUE DEFINITION OF THAINESS?

 

In order to be a "true" Thai and do what is expected of you in Thai society are Thais expected to behave towards Non Thais in this way?

 

Please Comment

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, peterrabbit said:

I went to the government hospital because I knew they had stocks of the medicine they have given my family a few days before, if I knew they had imposed a policy of NOT dispensing it to falangs I would not have wasted my time and gone directly to a private hospital.

 

No doubt that if you are so deliberately discriminated against on the grounds of your race, the results of which could potentially threaten your life, you will not be outraged by such behaviour? You should be first in line for the gas chambers as you won't complain when your shoved inside.

You wasted your time, so what, accept it. You are obviously not working so have all the time in the world. 

I suggest you look up the words 'integration' and 'assimilation', and note the differences. Time has a different meaning in this country. 

Btw, do your Thai relatives work? 

Edited by Neeranam
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, peterrabbit said:

was then charged 620b for some paracetamol and cough medicine I could have got at any pharmacy for far less.

Dont buy it if price is high. Why did you pay 620 baht? Mai ao khrup paeng mahk then walk out.

 

Nobody is forced to buy cough medicine. Doesnt work much anyway.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, peterrabbit said:

I was then charged 620b for some paracetamol and cough medicine I could have got at any pharmacy for far less.

You are budgeting and pay this price?

 

I went to Bangkok hospital last week and asked the price of the medicine and said 'no thanks' and bought it at the mall. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, peterrabbit said:

It was based on a racist policy which discriminates against NON Thais in the disbursement of Western produced medication to Westerners.

If you ever went to a Western Country would a Thai be discriminated against in such a manor? No they would not so why are the Thai authorities discriminating against Westerners?

Read the dictionary definition of racism!

 

I was charged 5,000 baht more than an Australian at Royal Melbourne Golf Club. Is this racist? 

Posted
8 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

The decision seems based on him being solely non-Thai and while he was quite unwell seems wholly wrong, particularly in light of the Op being an ‘at risk patient’.

 

The Op could have paid for the medicine, which is the case in anyway. 

Hospital only get a certain quota of medicines like this. 

They told him where to get it, but he never went. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

You’ve used this poorly thought out argument before (and similar ones). 

 

The answer is NO.... because he was likely a local resident... 

Had a Thai been a local resident he would receive a similar price than the Australian. 

An out of province Australian would also likely pay more than a local resident Thai. 

 

 

Big difference -  Thais go to Australia and work, get proper visas and learn English. Pattaya is  full of illegal immigrants, getting dodgy visas from agents. 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

There was clearly enough - it was in the pharmacy down the road - it seems there was a policy in place not to provide ’specific’ medication to non-Thai’s.... 

... somewhat disgusting in light of the ‘international medical aid’ and donations of vaccines Thailand received through the Covid crisis. 

Not to provide foreigners REDUCED priced medicine. 

Nothing wrong with this, IMHO. 

If he paid tax, that's another story. Can't you see why some Thais would have this policy? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

You have also distorted the issue - the Ops money paid for treatment, that treatment was not subsidised in any way..

The Op was no such burden on the medical care Thailand provides - he was a ‘paying patient’.

He is paying , but massively reduced price. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, newnative said:

    You were not discriminated against because of your race.  Foreigners, and Thai citizens for that matter, can be of any race.  You were turned away because the medicine was apparently only being provided to Thai nationals.  This is not racism.  It's nationalism; citizens sometimes given preferential treatment over non-citizens at government facilities. 

    It's the same thing as a national park having one price for citizens and a different price for non-citizens.  Not racist as both citizens and non-citizens can be any race--the focus is not on race, it's on citizen or non-citizen.  Now, if a national park had one price for Asian Thai citizens and higher prices for White and Black Thai citizens, that would be racist.  

Strange how history repeats itself.

Didn't Adolf Hitler, the head of the Socialist Nationalist party of Germany, constantly refer to nationalism, (for the good of Germany), as being the excuse for his barbaric and racist actions against non Germans?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...