Many Republicans Want Trump Convicted and 'Out of Their Way': Attorney

[Fat is a type of crazy]

NBC are calling Katie Hobbs as beating Kari Lake in Arizona. Nice. Lake adding the insult of losing her dignity and credibility, by going down the election fraud path, to the injury of losing. Future prospective candidates might realise backing Trump and his claims  is now a fast track to irrelevance. 

[Tropposurfer]

22 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Trump tried and has continued to try to get her charged. He never gave her a pass and she has never been indicted for any crimes. Her email server issues pale into insignificance compared to Trump's insiders' use of private email and burner phones.

And stealing highly sensitive federal documents, lying over and over about having them, refusing to return them, and in doing so compromising the lives of covert agents and contacts and procedures.

Its amazing huh how so many people simply don't care about, or research the facts from a range of reputable sources and aren't at all interested in those facts. Instead preferring (cause it requires zero critical thinking and dovetails into their own bigotry and biases) to simply lap up the false narratives tropes like a thirsty pooch. 

 

[Tropposurfer]

A lifelong, serial criminal.

Soon, it seems (sane people hope), to be convicted from multiple, imminent trails (the evidence of his decades long very serious real estate conspiratorial frauds in NY being just one which hopefully will see him do at least a decade in jail). 

Not to mention the high-crimes he has committed against the American People which are clearly treasonous in my opinion - attempting to overthrow the government. 

[bendejo]

5 hours ago, Jingthing said:

Chris Christie also known for obesity had his peak time and he didn't grab and also he's very rude which Americans are sick of.

I saw him on a few things in the past few months, he's grown more slimey and loathsome in my eyes.  Bill Maher was trying to get him to say he doesn't support DT and he managed to slide past actually saying it.  They don't drain the swamps in Jersey.

 

 

[ozimoron]

3 hours ago, vandeventer said:

It just shows how much the Democrats are just as sick as Biden.  Go Trump 2024 is waiting for you the Dems .are just so scared you will win.

Ask any Dem if they'd rather stand against DeSantis or Trump in 2024.

[thaibeachlovers]

3 hours ago, ozimoron said:

Rubbish, you have no evidence. The Trump apologists' best defence is "both sides do it".

Indeed both sides do it.That's why Trump got elected.

[ozimoron]

Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed both sides do it.That's why Trump got elected.

Dark money aka Citizens United is why Trump got elected.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, ozimoron said:

Dark money aka Citizens United is why Trump got elected.

Bye.

[ozimoron]

2 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Bye.

Why do you think Citizens United made it to the Supreme Court?

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, ozimoron said:

Dark money aka Citizens United is why Trump got elected.

That biased ruling by SCOTUS in 2010 was a blow to Democracy by favoring big business to be able to make unlimited donations to the PAC's of the Republicans for favorable policies.

 

Citizens United Explained | Brennan Center for Justice

 

A similar thing with dark money from Federalist Society to support the nominations of their candidates to SCOTUS

 

What in the World Happened to the Supreme Court? - The Atlantic

[heybruce]

13 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed Biden is "normal"

Business as usual in Washington

Lobbyists

Deals in back rooms

Election bribes

etc

 

Has everyone forgotten that Trump was elected as a protest against "Washington normalcy"?

And all that got worse under Trump.

[candide]

The Republicans are pathetic. They were ok with Trump's lies as long as they thought it would be beneficial to them. And the reason they want now to get rid of Trump is not related any moral concern, It's just because it didn't work for the midterms.

 

"What? Lying doesn't work any more? OMG!" ????

[thaibeachlovers]

12 hours ago, LosLobo said:

That biased ruling by SCOTUS in 2010 was a blow to Democracy by favoring big business to be able to make unlimited donations to the PAC's of the Republicans for favorable policies.

 

Citizens United Explained | Brennan Center for Justice

 

A similar thing with dark money from Federalist Society to support the nominations of their candidates to SCOTUS

 

What in the World Happened to the Supreme Court? - The Atlantic

LOL. Didn't do the Federalist Society much good then, did it?

[placeholder]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. Didn't do the Federalist Society much good then, did it?

Really? You don't think it's possible that the Republicans would have done much worse if not for that ruling? And of course, Trump, the swamp-drainer appointed justices who will continue to support that  ruling.

[LosLobo]

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. Didn't do the Federalist Society much good then, did it?

The Federalist Society successfully got their members appointed to SCOTUS, what else were they trying to achieve?

[placeholder]

14 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

LOL. Didn't do the Federalist Society much good then, did it?

It did them plenty of good. Workers continue to be screwed by the Supreme Court and corporate interests promoted. You ever hear of the phrase "follow the money"?

[Rhys]

With all the drama of both parties, I would not be surprised to see Trump back in the WH.

 

[ozimoron]

3 minutes ago, Rhys said:

With all the drama of both parties, I would not be surprised to see Trump back in the WH.

 

Is the left being investigated for something by any judicial authority? Anything?

[thaibeachlovers]

12 hours ago, LosLobo said:

The Federalist Society successfully got their members appointed to SCOTUS, what else were they trying to achieve?

I was talking about the last election, not over 2 years ago.

[LosLobo]

9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I was talking about the last election, not over 2 years ago.

You fail to understand that the US Constitution requires only the president to submit nominations for SCOTUS. Mid-terms don't change presidents.

 

With respect, if you cannot answer questions about your posts, why comment on subjects that you know nothing about?

 

Edited November 16, 2022 by LosLobo

[Scott]

Troll post removed. 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

3 hours ago, LosLobo said:

You fail to understand that the US Constitution requires only the president to submit nominations for SCOTUS. Mid-terms don't change presidents.

 

With respect, if you cannot answer questions about your posts, why comment on subjects that you know nothing about?

 

Given activity I am unable to comment on I am putting you on ignore. Bye.