Jump to content

Thaksin To Be Put Behind Bars Upon Return: Nipit


webfact

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

He can win and at the same time he is still a criminal.

Even if 100% of the people voted for him that doesn't change his crimes and convictions.

Thaksin could have stayed in Thailand and he could have tried to convince people that he is innocent of at least some of those crimes.

But he chose to run away. He chose to pretend to be above the law because he is rich enough to do that.

He should go to jail like any other criminal. 

Exactly!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, edwinchester said:

Maybe the illegal coup makers along with Taksin will come up with a blanket amnesty proposal in the name of national reconciliation along with a promise from the military of no more coups.

On what planet? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

I have problems understanding the arguments from some people here that because person A and B was not prosecuted or found guilty that person C can't be touched. Why not?

 

Thaksin is not more or less guilt because Prayut or that Ferrari driver is in jail or not. I am sure if Thaksin or any Thaksin friendly party will be in power again that then they will prosecute Prayut. Ok, do that. And then let's look at the evidence and the judges will find him guilty or not.

And Thaksin's case is independent of Prayut's case. If A is guilty that doesn't make B also guilty or not guilty or whatever.

A little althistory speculation might be in order - just for fun.

What if there wasn't the Thaksin coup or even the Yingluck coerced/forced exile that can about.

 

How might we be different today? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Bert got kinky said:

So unlike the Toxic one, no convictions then, yet you find them guilty without a trail?

:shock1:

 

Some of the charges have been heard/decided in absentia, found guilty and sentenced to big fines and jail terms.

 

Other charges; lots of details of the evidence already published (years ago) and not looking good.

 

Do I have evidence? NO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Andycoops said:

Let's hope the current crop of cronies and usurpers join him as well.

Highly unlikely, as SOE requires some circle of support by way of their continued cappers. 

All these dramas appear to be cycles of repeated history - events from the 1930s through the 1970s [and beyond] have keen similarities. Just as it's presenting itself today. 

 

Nothing much changes throughout the Thai political landscape. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, NoshowJones said:

He is guilty of taking over the country illegally, there is no court who can honestly say that he didn't. There was a legally elected government in power when this no hoper and his soldiers took over the country.

Again, you are declaring him guilty without a trial.

Are you really ok with that, is that acceptable in your book?

 

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zzaa09 said:

A little althistory speculation might be in order - just for fun.

What if there wasn't the Thaksin coup or even the Yingluck coerced/forced exile that can about.

 

How might we be different today? 

Half of Siam Square would still exist.

 

siam-theatre-burned-siam-square-14410941

 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

His convictions were politically motivated after a military coup.

 

Which is exactly the reason why he is not regarded as a criminal anywhere in the World outside of Thailand and is free to travel where he wishes without fear of arrest or persecution.

I guess that is also the case with the Ferrari driver, or not?

A politician who is a criminal is still a criminal. It doesn't matter that the people who don't like him started the prosecution. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Bert got kinky said:

Yes it has, innocent people are not being dragged from their houses and executed for simply speaking out against the establishment.

Can I presume that your board name indicates that you do not have a dog in this fight?

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/world/asia/thailand-dissidents-disappeared-military.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Cut a deal with who?

Prawit, Prayut, Anutin and all the others don't want him back.

Only his own party would try to change the law if they got into power and give him a pardon. 

The Thais are regular Houdinis when it comes to deals. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...