Jump to content

It had to be Wu ! We knew the truth all along.


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Swiss1960 said:

And of course, Tucker Carlson is THE most trusted "journalist" ever on Fox News.... thus post should be in the Pub section 

Posts about politics rightly belong in the world section which carries a banner warning about links to evidence to stop people spreading conspiracy theories. Not that that's likely in a thread about Carlson.

  • Like 1
Posted

"I can neither confirm nor deny' ... my source.  Why would anyone burn their source by disclosing.  May need in the future.

 

Bat soup, or USA funded research (illegal in the USA), and released (accident or on purpose) ... don't know about y'all, but I know which one is more credible to me.

 

Especially since the guy that testifying about the NIH's involvement, that funded the weaponizing, oops, sorry, research, couldn't even keep his stories straight while trying to deflect the truth.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/nih-admits-funding-risky-virus-research-in-wuhan

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Swiss1960 said:

And of course, Tucker Carlson is THE most trusted "journalist" ever on Fox News.... thus post should be in the Pub section 

In regards to this news clip back in 2020 and your statement ,Tucker doesn’t need to say anything his host revealed to the world the Ccp’s Wuhan lab leak!

 

 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, dotcalm said:

Maybe, just maybe one needs to look into the documents he declassified for further answers. Maybe, just maybe Trump has some military tribunal grade docs/material the DC regime so desperately wants deep six'd for good.

 

And if the virus didn't emanate from a wuhan lab leak why did the Chinese refuse to cooperate with the investigation into the origins of covid. Trump knows, he stated as much and people said he was spreading misinformation, but now, it's show he's was right, right again. No surprise.

 

 

That's incoherent. If Trump had such declassified material, he would have released it. 

  • Like 2
Posted

 

The "low confidence" conclusion from the DOE isn't the end of the debate.

 

"“Some elements of the intelligence community have reached conclusions on one side, some on the other. A number of them have said they just don’t have enough information to be sure.”

So where does that leave us? Not far from where we started."  https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/27/politics/covid-origins-doe-assessment-what-matters/index.html

Posted
5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Yet another cornerstone of the so-called "fake news" falls by the wayside.  Remember how the MSM ridiculed and ostracized anyone who dared put this theory forward?  Even noted member of the Left Jon Steward was pilloried for daring to contradict the Approved Narrative when he was on the Colbert show.  

 

https://news.yahoo.com/dare-jon-stewart-reflects-lab-202138738.html

"Remember how the MSM ridiculed and ostracized anyone who dared put this theory forward?"

 

No.  Can you give examples?  Not pundits or comedians (it's sometimes difficult to distinguish the two) but actual journalists and the experts they interviewed?

Posted
7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Yet another cornerstone of the so-called "fake news" falls by the wayside.  Remember how the MSM ridiculed and ostracized anyone who dared put this theory forward?  Even noted member of the Left Jon Steward was pilloried for daring to contradict the Approved Narrative when he was on the Colbert show.  

 

https://news.yahoo.com/dare-jon-stewart-reflects-lab-202138738.html

Not really. There was an abundant debate about it in the MSM, punctuated by the publication of several scientific studies.

Of course, there was also a conspiracy theory about the Chinese knowingly diffusing the virus in order to weaken the West, which has probably been ridiculised frequently.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...