Mac Mickmanus Posted May 28, 2023 Share Posted May 28, 2023 7 minutes ago, candide said: Which mistake have they made in this case? Any evidence of it? Or is it just your imagination? That is just your imagination , you imagined that I said that . I didn't say that the FBI made any mistakes, you just imagined that I said that 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted May 28, 2023 Share Posted May 28, 2023 1 minute ago, Mac Mickmanus said: That is just your imagination , you imagined that I said that . I didn't say that the FBI made any mistakes, you just imagined that I said that Then why did you feel the need to evoke it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted May 28, 2023 Share Posted May 28, 2023 30 minutes ago, candide said: The content of the documents is irrelevant to some of the potential charges, in particular the obstruction of justice charge. So who took the documents and where did they move them to ? The content of the documents is also relevant , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted May 28, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 28, 2023 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: So who took the documents and where did they move them to ? The content of the documents is also relevant , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? Well, if you want to satisfy your curiosity about each and every aspect of this case, I'm afraid you need to spend time with our friend Google. Of course, the content of the documents may be an added bonus. However, they wouldn't need it for an obstruction of justice charge. The obstruction-related statute carries the strongest sentence of a fine and a maximum 20 years in jail for each offense. Edited May 28, 2023 by candide 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Mac Mickmanus Posted May 28, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 28, 2023 2 minutes ago, candide said: Well, if you want to satisfy your curiosity about each and every aspect of this case, I'm afraid you need to spend time with our friend Google. Of course, the content of the documents may be an added bonus. However, they wouldn't need it for an obstruction of justice charge. The obstruction-related statute carries the strongest sentence of a fine and a maximum 20 years in jail for each offense. I am asking you to clarify your claims , if you make a claim, then you are required to provide evidence of those claims So, where were the boxes found ? I have asked you three times now 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post candide Posted May 28, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 28, 2023 16 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said: I am asking you to clarify your claims , if you make a claim, then you are required to provide evidence of those claims So, where were the boxes found ? I have asked you three times now I 'm not going to spend my time searching the Internet for you. They found extra documents, that's fact. If you want details, search for them! 1 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 Sounds like the continual witch hunt. If you believe this nonsense, fool you. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 13 minutes ago, Neeranam said: Sounds like the continual witch hunt. If you believe this nonsense, fool you. Maybe just abandon the national records archives? Future presidents don't need those documents anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted May 29, 2023 Author Share Posted May 29, 2023 Comment on moderation removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post xylophone Posted May 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2023 45 minutes ago, Neeranam said: Sounds like the continual witch hunt. If you believe this nonsense, fool you. Well it's already been proven that there were documents from the WH, in Mar-a-lago, so I don't know where you're coming from with your comment about a "continual witchhunt", because it is a fact, and hopefully trump will be punished accordingly. Of course the trumpies and Maga-nuts will continue with their comments about a "witchhunt" and "nonsense" even if trump is found guilty, or even better, jailed. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 11 minutes ago, xylophone said: Well it's already been proven that there were documents from the WH, in Mar-a-lago Is that illegal? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce Posted May 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2023 12 minutes ago, Neeranam said: Is that illegal? Yes. It is a violation of the Presidential Records Act. Trump was informed of this and still refused to return documents that didn't belong to him. You really need a better news source if you were unaware of this. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post ozimoron Posted May 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2023 (edited) 10 minutes ago, heybruce said: Yes. It is a violation of the Presidential Records Act. Trump was informed of this and still refused to return documents that didn't belong to him. You really need a better news source if you were unaware of this. Disingenuous trolling is becoming a problem around here. It's entirely the reason I have reduced my presence in recent weeks. Edited May 29, 2023 by ozimoron 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 2 hours ago, Neeranam said: Is that illegal? Are you that uninformed or are you just trolling? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 29 minutes ago, candide said: Are you that uninformed or are you just trolling? I rarely follow the news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 26 minutes ago, Neeranam said: I rarely follow the news. Rarely use Google too, I guess. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earlinclaifornia Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 On 5/27/2023 at 11:22 AM, riclag said: Two of Donald Trump’s employees moved boxes of papers the day before FBI agents and a prosecutor visited the former president’s Florida home to retrieve classified documents in response to a subpoena — timing that investigators have come to view as suspicious and an indication of possible obstruction, according to people familiar with the matter. How and who reports these “suspicious”and “possible” obstruction allegations to the news organizations ? What are there motives! Sad state of affairs my countries 3 letter agencies have created imop You are smart enough to know ALL FBI Directors are Republicans. Democratic presidents appoint Republicans to run the FBI. For nearly 100 years! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post earlinclaifornia Posted May 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2023 1 hour ago, Neeranam said: I rarely follow the news. Your post makes me believe this is a factual admittance indeed. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 2 hours ago, Neeranam said: I rarely follow the news. Then on what did you base your "continual witch hunt" post? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neeranam Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 6 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said: Your post makes me believe this is a factual admittance indeed. Not sure what you mean by, 'admittance', unless you think not following the US political news is something wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post heybruce Posted May 29, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted May 29, 2023 (edited) Spoiler alert: Legally there is a huge difference between inadvertently possessing classified and returning it immediately once it is identified and knowingly possessing classified and refusing to return it. Edited May 29, 2023 by Pink Mist Replied to post removed 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pink Mist Posted May 29, 2023 Share Posted May 29, 2023 Posts moving the OP off topic have been removed. Do not attempt to hijack the OP to include others. The OP is: Trump workers moved Mar-a-Lago boxes a day before Justice Dept. came for documents Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 On 5/28/2023 at 1:05 PM, Mac Mickmanus said: So who took the documents and where did they move them to ? The content of the documents is also relevant , where they the USA nuclear codes or were they the White house window cleaning bills ? Good point! Anybody guess! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billd766 Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 1 hour ago, riclag said: Good point! Anybody guess! Guesses and speculation are all you have and are worth nothing against the fact, and it is a fact, that Trump illegally took documents from the White House to his home at Mar a Lago. Another fact is that those documents were NOT kept in a secure location. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac Mickmanus Posted May 30, 2023 Share Posted May 30, 2023 2 hours ago, billd766 said: Guesses and speculation are all you have and are worth nothing against the fact, and it is a fact, that Trump illegally took documents from the White House to his home at Mar a Lago. Another fact is that those documents were NOT kept in a secure location. Why hasn't Trump ben arrested and charged ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted May 31, 2023 Share Posted May 31, 2023 15 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said: Why hasn't Trump ben arrested and charged ? When all else fails, complain that the investigation is going on too long. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now