Chonburi Crash: Woman Dies as Car Flips Several Times on Accident-Prone Road

[KannikaP]

8 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Guess it depends on Phi's location at the time.

 

If behind then yes the right side would be the wrong side.

Please explain. If Phi was behind the car, left is left and right is right.

If he was in front of the car, he probably wouldn't be here now.

[brianthainess]

14 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

On which side of a clear road should you drive in Thailand at 5.30am please?

Witness Phi (not real name) says she was on the right.

If a duel carriage way, probably in the right LANE to avoid the dickheads with no tail lights

[KannikaP]

Just now, sandyf said:

No he didn't.  "he saw the car speed along the right lane"

You are assuming he meant "wrong".

If Phi saw the car speeding along the RIGHT lane, would it not have been coming towards him? If the car was in the WRONG lane, then it would have been going away from him.

[brianthainess]

18 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

On which side of a clear road should you drive in Thailand at 5.30am please?

Witness Phi (not real name) says she was on the right.

 

23 hours ago, webfact said:

An 18 years old witness, Phi (pseudonym), shared his account of the accident, stating that he saw the car speed along the right lane,

The right lane IS NOT the wrong side of a road, maybe the wrong lane but not the wrong SIDE. 

[KannikaP]

Just now, brianthainess said:

 

The right lane IS NOT the wrong side of a road, maybe the wrong lane but not the wrong SIDE. 

OK, we need more evidence like, was it a dual carriageway? Which footpath did it hit, and on which side of the road was the wreckage found. 

[actonion]

NO, the vehicle is never in control, the operator is the one in control, i dislike using the word driver because they are not drivers of any sort

[actonion]

52 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

No, when SHE lost control of her vehicle.

Journalism here is as  bad   as the road users

[Ralf001]

22 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Please explain. If Phi was behind the car, left is left and right is right.

If he was in front of the car, he probably wouldn't be here now.

You have explained it yourself.

If he is behind and the car is in the right hand lane..... well that would be the wrong lane.

Assuming the road is not dual carriageway of course.

[gargamon]

This kind of thing happens everywhere. Here's a lady doing her driver's test in Argentina. https://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2023/06/16/driving-test-crash-argentina-cprog-orig-ff.cnn

[Liverpool Lou]

1 hour ago, watchcat said:

13 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Where did it state that she wasn't wearing a seat belt?

Where did it state that she was using her phone?

Had she used the seat belt she would probably been strapped to the seat. Regarding the phone, very many drivers use their phones while driving.

...yes, and still with a broken neck and trapped under the crushed, overturned car from which she had to be cut out.  How would wearing a seat belt have helped her in this multi-rollover accident?

[KannikaP]

1 hour ago, Ralf001 said:

How ?

And stupid too.

[Ralf001]

1 hour ago, KannikaP said:

And stupid too.

Driving 90km/h in a 90 zone is safe...

Driving 91km/h (speeding) in a 90 zone is unsafe...

 

Some top shelf idiot logic right there KannikaP and yet you have the gall to call me stupid !

[KannikaP]

4 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

Driving 90km/h in a 90 zone is safe...

Driving 91km/h (speeding) in a 90 zone is unsafe...

 

Some top shelf idiot logic right there KannikaP and yet you have the gall to call me stupid !

You bragged that you speed all the time. Enough said.

[Ralf001]

4 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

You bragged that you speed all the time. Enough said.

I I did not say by how much. Enough said.

[In Full Agreement]

3 hours ago, Ralf001 said:

How ?

 

With all due respect,  if you're unable to figure that out on your own, I'm not going to make the effort to explain it to you.

 

This may,  however, give you a few helpful pointers:

 

https://www.coluccio-law.com/crash-risk-time-saved-speeding/#:~:text=The average driver saves 26,about 2 minutes a week.

[Ralf001]

2 minutes ago, In Full Agreement said:

 

With all due respect,  if you're unable to figure that out on your own, I'm not going to make the effort to explain it to you.

 

This may,  however, give you a few helpful pointers:

 

https://www.coluccio-law.com/crash-risk-time-saved-speeding/#:~:text=The average driver saves 26,about 2 minutes a week.

With all due respect,

Driving 90km/h in a 90 zone is safe...

Driving 91km/h (speeding) in a 90 zone is dangerous...

 

Bwahahahahahahahahahwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

[jacko45k]

5 hours ago, mikebell said:

Almost hourly we hear of deaths from speeding.  This crime is surely the easiest to deter via CCTV cameras?  Oh and a police force. 

Jeez, they put in CCTV decades ago... and then a few years ago told us most of it was defunct due to negligible maintenance. Have no idea were we stand with that now...

[scottiejohn]

1 hour ago, Ralf001 said:

Driving 90km/h in a 90 zone is safe...

Driving 91km/h (speeding) in a 90 zone is unsafe...

 

Some top shelf idiot logic right there KannikaP and yet you have the gall to call me stupid !

I do too!

 

PS;  Speed limits are there to inform you of the maximum speed you are allowed to drive at, not the speed above which you should accelerate!

[jacko45k]

4 hours ago, brianthainess said:

If a duel carriage way, probably in the right LANE to avoid the dickheads with no tail lights

How about those with no headlights?

[Ralf001]

1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

I do too!

 

PS;  Speed limits are there to inform you of the maximum speed you are allowed to drive at, not the speed above which you should accelerate!

My car does not have accelerometer to tell me how much iam accelerating but am fairly certain to speed up to 90km/h and beyond Iam doing more than 25 metres a second.

[Ralf001]

1 hour ago, jacko45k said:

How about those with no headlights?

or those scoots with red headlights coming at you !!

[scottiejohn]

29 minutes ago, Ralf001 said:

My car does not have accelerometer

It has! It is you!

It also has an accelerator which sane people use appropriately.

This obviously does not apply to dangerous road hogs like yourself.

[Ralf001]

3 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

It has! It is you!

It also has an accelerator which sane people use appropriately.

This obviously does not apply to dangerous road hogs like yourself.

yeah my car like many has an accelerator.

 

what roads am I dangerously hogging by doing 1km/h over the speed limit ?

 

would have thought a road hog is someone who sits in 10 under the limit in the fast lane and refuses to move over for vehicles doing the limit.