Jump to content

Hydroxchrloroquine is shown to be safe and effective says Science direct


Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, dhupverg said:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297523000914

 

Conclusion
Treatment of COVID-19 using a combination of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin was safe and was associated with a statistically significant mortality benefit in the treatment of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients. Our findings do not support the current negative recommendations regarding this treatment.

This was the go to treatment for anyone under clinical care with a mild or moderate case under the Thailand MoPH guidelines back in 2020-21. 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

Happy reading!

 

Inhibition of the Binding of Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Spike Protein to a Human Receptor by Chlorine Dioxide

https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/inhibition-of-the-binding-of-variants-of-sars-cov-2-coronavirus-spike-7364.pdf

 

"These findings show that chlorine dioxide aqueous solution can inactivate the binding of the variant spike proteins to the human ACE2 receptor protein, indicating that this strategy may be useful in blocking the transmission of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses."

 

Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18089729/

 

Evaluation of the antiviral activity of chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite against feline calicivirus, human influenza virus, measles virus, canine distemper virus, human herpesvirus, human adenovirus, canine adenovirus and canine parvovirus

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20616431/

Thank you, for your lame attempt at deflection.

 

Could you point to anywhere in the studies that you posted that chlorine dioxide blocked COVID infection 'in vivo'?

 

Edited by LosLobo
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, LosLobo said:

With respect, I think that the issue at hand here is that you failed to substantiate your disingenuous claims.

 

Firstly, that chlorine dioxide was not (a) bleach.

 

Secondly, that chlorine dioxide protected against COVID in the human body.

 

Shall we go for the trifecta here?

 

Please point to the claim that Trump recommended 'household bleach' to treat Covid.

 

Chlorine dioxide is not "bleach" in the way 99% of people understand it, but you already know that, you're just playing with words.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
1 hour ago, impulse said:

Also, the oft repeated "Ivermectin is horse medicine" in spite of it being used in treating humans, for years and in billions of doses.


But Trumpers are the gullible ones being fooled?

 

Yep they certainly are, especially those that took the animal version of Ivermectin and not the human formulation.....lol. 

 

In addition as the OP states in the study, it was only a little effective when combined with antibiotic treatment (azithromycin). The treatment of covid 19 with antibiotics was discovered well before.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yep they certainly are, especially those that took the animal version of Ivermectin and not the human formulation.....lol. 

You mean the ones whose doctors were not allowed to prescribe the human version for fear of losing their licenses to practice?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, impulse said:

You mean the ones whose doctors were not allowed to prescribe the human version for fear of losing their licenses to practice?

 

No 

Posted
40 minutes ago, mohlite said:

Hydroxychloroquine was known as a safe and effective drug for Covid-19 and was used in China from the beginning. 

However, having a safe and effective medicine would preclude expedited approval, EUA, (emergency use authorization) for the Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, for the vaccine promoters, dismissing all safe and effective treatments was essential.

 President Trump touted HCQ as an effective treatment. The Pfizer-sponsored media, additionally suffering from the Trump derangement syndrome, was quick to denounce anything recommended by Trump. Truth did not matter to them; neither did the lives of people who could die following wrong recommendations.

Coronavirus: ‘conflicting treatment message’ as China rejects Trump-touted drug hydroxychloroquine

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3098021/coronavirus-conflicting-treatment-message-china-rejects-trump

 

43 minutes ago, mohlite said:

However, having a safe and effective medicine would preclude expedited approval, EUA, (emergency use authorization) for the Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, for the vaccine promoters, dismissing all safe and effective treatments was essential.

False other treatments aside from vaccines have been trialed alongside the vaccines.

 

Clinical platform trials for coronavirus (COVID-19) treatments
Past and current clinical trials into therapeutic and antiviral treatments for COVID-19, how to take part, and which treatments have proven to be effective.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/clinical-platform-trials-for-coronavirus-covid-19-treatments

  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

False other treatments aside from vaccines have been trialed alongside the vaccines.

 

Clinical platform trials for coronavirus (COVID-19) treatments
Past and current clinical trials into therapeutic and antiviral treatments for COVID-19, how to take part, and which treatments have proven to be effective.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/clinical-platform-trials-for-coronavirus-covid-19-treatments

Have any of these trial's identified suitable treatments for covid and approved by the FDA? I suspect not.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, mohlite said:

Have any of these trial's identified suitable treatments for covid and approved by the FDA? I suspect not.

The US is not the center of the world, these are UK based trials however the FDA has indeed approved treatments for covid 19 other than vaccines

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

The US is not the center of the world, these are UK based trials however the FDA has indeed approved treatments for covid 19 other than vaccines

I doubt there were any approved when HCQ was blocked.

Posted
1 minute ago, mohlite said:

I doubt there were any approved when HCQ was blocked.

Lets wind this back a little. You made a direct claim...........

 

1 hour ago, mohlite said:

However, having a safe and effective medicine would preclude expedited approval, EUA, (emergency use authorization) for the Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, for the vaccine promoters, dismissing all safe and effective treatments was essential.

Provide evidence to that false information 

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Lets wind this back a little. You made a direct claim...........

 

Provide evidence to that false information 

"Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."

An EUA can only be granted when no adequate, approved, available alternatives exist, and when the known and potential benefits outweigh the potential risks. An EUA also only lasts as long as the public health emergency for which it was declared.  

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

 

This is information as per FDA in USA, not UK.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, mohlite said:

"Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."

An EUA can only be granted when no adequate, approved, available alternatives exist, and when the known and potential benefits outweigh the potential risks. An EUA also only lasts as long as the public health emergency for which it was declared.  

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained

 

This is information as per FDA in USA, not UK.

 

 

Treatments and vaccines are two separate entities. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...