Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

 

It's that time of the year again to renew my WrLife insurance with another year.

 

The broker has send me already the details along with policies from other insurers.

 

I have the Serenity $US 200,000 coverage.

 

The broker keeps contacting me about considering another Insurance. When I asked them directly

or there is something going on with WrLife, I didn't received an answer.

 

Do I have to worry about WrLife?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

There have been several threads over the past few years.  Seems there have been very few claims reported on here.

It would be nice to know if in fact someone had a significant event that was riembursed by this compnay.  But, maybe they are afraid to talk about it.  Bottom line: who knows.

 

PS:  Maybe WR Life does not give a commision to brokers so they want people to go with another company.

Edited by bkk6060
  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Henk Langeweg said:

The broker keeps contacting me about considering another Insurance. When I asked them directly

or there is something going on with WrLife, I didn't received an answer.

Only one reason, the other companies offer your broker higher commission rates.  If the other insurers' policies were better for you, he'd have told you.

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

It would be nice to know if in fact someone had a significant event that was riembursed by this compnay.  But, maybe they are afraid to talk about it.  Bottom line: who knows.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1286793-wrlife-claim-filed-take-2/?do=findComment&comment=17906063

 

And regarding the post above, anybody can write that the company's reviews and the company itself are suspect to me. (even with their clothes on)

 

Edited by jerrymahoney
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, HauptmannUK said:

I have no idea of the significance of these events - just flagging it up.  

Me as well however AIS is still listed as the claims processor which is where all the resigned Thai director were employed.

https://www.wrlife.net/documents/WRLIFE CLAIM SETTLEMENT PROCESS.pdf

 

And note that the German version of the above still listing AIS is dated 

 

09 NOVEMBER 2023 WRLIFE CLAIM SETTLEMENT PROCESS GERMAN
 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/15/2023 at 7:23 PM, Henk Langeweg said:

Hi,

 

It's that time of the year again to renew my WrLife insurance with another year.

 

The broker has send me already the details along with policies from other insurers.

 

I have the Serenity $US 200,000 coverage.

 

The broker keeps contacting me about considering another Insurance. When I asked them directly

or there is something going on with WrLife, I didn't received an answer.

 

Do I have to worry about WrLife?

My broker was fine with renewing WRLife for another year; he's normally quick to suggest alternatives if they benefit him!

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:

WR Life is a limited liability partnership registered in the UK with 2 non-resident partners in France and India.

 

They would be prohibited from carrying on business in Thailand if they were registered here.

 

What are you going to do if they don't pay? who will you sue? which non-existent regulator or ombudsman will you appeal to?

 

 

I think one might have to engage the insurance regulator on the island of Nevis in the Caribbean. 

 

https://www.nevisfsrc.com/regulated-entities/#general-insurance-companies

 

 

Screenshot 2023-11-23 at 8.08.42 PM.png

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

I think one might have to engage the insurance regulator on the island of Nevis in the Caribbean. 

 

https://www.nevisfsrc.com/regulated-entities/#general-insurance-companies

 

 

Screenshot 2023-11-23 at 8.08.42 PM.png


Just 2 problems with that, 1st their jurisdiction is St. Kitts & Nevis and 2nd, that’s not the same WR Life Company that you sign up with.

 

IMHO it’s a long game scam, they will pay out small claims but not big ones and will trade until someone stops them.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, JBChiangRai said:


Just 2 problems with that, 1st their jurisdiction is St. Kitts & Nevis and 2nd, that’s not the same WR Life Company that you sign up with.

 

IMHO it’s a long game scam, they will pay out small claims but not big ones and will trade until someone stops them.

Yes, it does raise the issue of how much enforcement power the regulator on Nevis has over a company incorporated in the UK. For me, it also begs the question as to how consumer-friendly the regulator would be and how well-developed the regulations are in Nevis. I think Nevis only requires $100,000 in capital for a non-Nevis company to register as a foreign insurance company.  I do not know how the regulator on Nevis supervises capital adequacy ratios or loss reserves of insurers, but if only $100,000 is required to be come a licensed foreign insurer, the regulations might not be that stringent.

 

I've come across another company that uses a similar setup. I think the company is incorporated in a state in the US as an LLC and then submits to an insurance regulator in the Caribbean. They have a distribution arm in a free zone in the Middle East which is outside the ambit of the local insurance regulator. Seems there are ways to become a licensed insurance company with minimal capital and subject to possibly light regulatory oversight.

 

My preference would be to insure with a long-established insurance company with a known track record for paying claims. I would also want to be able to find financial ratings from AM Best or Standard and Poors and the insurer would need to be incorporated in a well-regulated and accessible jurisdiction. I would want to have this information before I entered into a contract of insurance.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
12 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

WR Life is a limited liability partnership registered in the UK with 2 non-resident partners in France and India.

 

They would be prohibited from carrying on business in Thailand if they were registered here.

 

What are you going to do if they don't pay? who will you sue? which non-existent regulator or ombudsman will you appeal to?

 

 

 I have no idea.  Who do you suggest?  If they're as dodgy as you suggest, surely there would be publicity as they're doing tremendous business in the expat market.

Posted
6 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 I have no idea.  Who do you suggest?  If they're as dodgy as you suggest, surely there would be publicity as they're doing tremendous business in the expat market.

 

The point is you have no recourse, you can't sue anyone (except maybe your agent if you can prove he was complicit), they are outside the jurisdiction of the regulator here (who would shut them down in a heartbeat if they opened a legal entity here).

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

My preference would be to insure with a long-established insurance company with a known track record for paying claims. I would also want to be able to find financial ratings from AM Best or Standard and Poors and the insurer would need to be incorporated in a well-regulated and accessible jurisdiction. I would want to have this information before I entered into a contract of insurance.


I was with BUPA/Thailand pre-Aetna and then CIGNA Global (CIGNA Belgium underwriter). I then I moved to an area where CIGNA Global had no direct-pay hospitals and their procedures to deal with no direct-pay were burdensome.

 

So I started looking primarily  to get a direct-pay set-up. Sometimes what may prove best for someone may not be only what A.M. Best has to say.

Posted
39 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:


I was with BUPA/Thailand pre-Aetna and then CIGNA Global (CIGNA Belgium underwriter). I then I moved to an area where CIGNA Global had no direct-pay hospitals and their procedures to deal with no direct-pay were burdensome.

 

So I started looking primarily  to get a direct-pay set-up. Sometimes what may prove best for someone may not be only what A.M. Best has to say.

Yes, everyone needs to assess their own individual needs and risk tolerance and make their decision based upon what they believe is best.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

Yes, everyone needs to assess their own individual needs and risk tolerance and make their decision based upon what they believe is best.

 

Indeed.  Having a broker you can trust helps too.

  • Agree 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Etaoin Shrdlu said:

Yes, everyone needs to assess their own individual needs and risk tolerance and make their decision based upon what they believe is best.

Thank you. Nice to occasionally read something other than --

download.jpg.6551397716ebdde384c2a178297bf0a6.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/15/2023 at 7:23 PM, Henk Langeweg said:

When I asked them directly

or there is something going on with WrLife, I didn't received an answer.

I am presuming your broker is based in Thailand?

If so are they just ignoring the regulations which suggest they should not be offering up International based insurers - I am basing this on several comments in other threads by @Etaoin Shrdlu and my own experience  (and others) with AA Insurance brokers?

It may just be that AA were bought out by a larger company who did not want to take any risk and smaller independent brokers will just carry on.

 

6 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Indeed.  Having a broker you can trust helps too.

Agreed - presumably local to you in Thailand?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, topt said:

I am presuming your broker is based in Thailand?

If so are they just ignoring the regulations which suggest they should not be offering up International based insurers - I am basing this on several comments in other threads by @Etaoin Shrdlu and my own experience  (and others) with AA Insurance brokers?

It may just be that AA were bought out by a larger company who did not want to take any risk and smaller independent brokers will just carry on.

 

Agreed - presumably local to you in Thailand?

 

It is possible that the insurance broker is trying to stop referring their clients to offshore insurers due to concerns about OIC regulations. If this is indeed the motivation, I can see how this could be a difficult situation for the broker to manage with their client at this point.

 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 I have no idea.  Who do you suggest?  If they're as dodgy as you suggest, surely there would be publicity as they're doing tremendous business in the expat market.

They are doing great business because of the price. How can they pay big claims at those prices and with no increase in premiums?

Also, have you seen or heard of any big claims being paid?

The nail in the coffin for me is that all the Thai officers resigned here in Thailand, shouldn't that be a warning to everybody??

Good luck but remember the old saying, if it's too good to be true, it probably is.

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, racyrick said:

They are doing great business because of the price. How can they pay big claims at those prices and with no increase in premiums?

Also, have you seen or heard of any big claims being paid?

The nail in the coffin for me is that all the Thai officers resigned here in Thailand, shouldn't that be a warning to everybody??

Good luck but remember the old saying, if it's too good to be true, it probably is.

 There have been some posts on this Forum about some fairly big claims being made.  But, it's usually the problem claims that get the publicity!

Posted
10 hours ago, racyrick said:

Good luck but remember the old saying, if it's too good to be true, it probably is.

Good to also remember the old saying:

 

He who laughs last, laughs best. (John Heywood's book of proverbs, 1546)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...