Biden slams Trump for Capitol riot in 2024 campaign speech

[thaibeachlovers]

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

The Trump plan was to stop the certification of the electoral vote.

 

So far, over 1,000 protestors have been convicted, mostly for violent behavior at the Capitol. Perhaps you were sleeping while watching the insurrection. 

You keep talking about a "Trump plan" as if it were true, while offering not a shred of evidence that he had a plan at all. I guess you took a lesson from that guy you talked about a while ago and use his technique of just making stuff up till people believe it.

[Danderman123]

3 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

In this case you can't prove that Trump committed a crime at all. You are a master at making it up, that's for sure.

You do understand that Trump is on trial for precisely these charges. There are witnesses who will explain all of this to you.

 

Note that his defense so far is presidential immunity.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

 

I scorn your photos. They show a tiny minority of the IMO thousands of people that were there peacefully. You are making it up, again.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 minute ago, Danderman123 said:

You do understand that Trump is on trial for precisely these charges. There are witnesses who will explain all of this to you.

 

Note that his defense so far is presidential immunity.

 

If they had any actual evidence they would, I'm sure, have charged him straight away, not years later when he is trying to become POTUS again. He must really scare them to make them resort to such stupid actions, IMO.

 

Next.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 1/12/2024 at 9:20 PM, Danderman123 said:

What was sad was that Trump incited people to go the Capitol, where many were injured, and some subsequently died.

Wasn't the only person killed an unarmed protester killed by the cops? I understand the others died of natural causes.

[thaibeachlovers]

On 1/12/2024 at 10:30 PM, Danderman123 said:

Few guns were brought, because they were not necessary, and if used, would provoke an immediate and crushing response by the US Armed Forces. Conversely, the military could and did ignore what seemed to be a simple riot.

Few guns were brought,

 

Seriously? Perhaps you can inform us as to how many and how they were used? If you can't, you must be making it up, again.

 

As I understand it the National Guard wasn't there because someone thought there wouldn't be any need for them, and the force actually there was insufficient to prevent the invasion. One could come up with a theory about that, if one wanted to.

Edited January 14 by thaibeachlovers

[metisdead]

An insulting troll post contravening our Community Standards has been reported and removed.

[Danderman123]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Few guns were brought,

 

Seriously? Perhaps you can inform us as to how many and how they were used? If you can't, you must be making it up, again.

 

As I understand it the National Guard wasn't there because someone thought there wouldn't be any need for them, and the force actually there was insufficient to prevent the invasion. One could come up with a theory about that, if one wanted to.

Evidence of firearms in Jan. 6 crowd grows as arrests and trials mount

 

Several people pleaded with Trump to call in the National Guard, but Trump declined. Finally, Pence called them in.

 

The blame is 100% on your man Trump. He knew what was going on, but refused to do anything.

 

Did he freeze up, or did he wait to see if the insurrection succeeded?

[FritsSikkink]

On 1/15/2024 at 6:01 AM, Danderman123 said:

 

He has no clue. Nice article that shows Trump will have big issues defending himself: Jack Smith charged Trump using Reconstruction-era laws passed against KKK: columnist (msn.com)

[Danderman123]

On 1/14/2024 at 7:59 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

In this case you can't prove that Trump committed a crime at all. You are a master at making it up, that's for sure.

Do you believe that the Special Counsel is making it up, as well?

 

[thaibeachlovers]

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Do you believe that the Special Counsel is making it up, as well?

 

I'm sure you know what my reply to that would be if I said it, but I don't have a link so I'm not saying.

[candide]

9 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm sure you know what my reply to that would be if I said it, but I don't have a link so I'm not saying.

So you have nothing, as usual.

[Danderman123]

On 1/14/2024 at 8:02 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

You keep talking about a "Trump plan" as if it were true, while offering not a shred of evidence that he had a plan at all. I guess you took a lesson from that guy you talked about a while ago and use his technique of just making stuff up till people believe it.

I will defer to Jack Smith, who has the goods on Trump. Stay tuned.

[Danderman123]

11 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm sure you know what my reply to that would be if I said it, but I don't have a link so I'm not saying.

In other words, your internet masters haven't given you a talking point to cover the specific allegations by Jack Smith.

 

Let me ask you this: who told the Proud Boys and other militia groups about the plan to storm the Capitol?

[Danderman123]

On 1/14/2024 at 7:59 PM, thaibeachlovers said:

In this case you can't prove that Trump committed a crime at all. You are a master at making it up, that's for sure.

Why did some people bring zip ties to the Capitol?

 

How about those people who had bullhorns and walkie talkies?

 

Do you think they just woke up on the morning of January 6, and thought "I am going to hear Trump speak at the Ellipse and bring my zip ties"?

 

If you are trying to prove that Trump followers are obtuse, you are highly successful.

Edited January 17 by Danderman123

[candide]

On 1/15/2024 at 12:21 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Few guns were brought,

 

Seriously? Perhaps you can inform us as to how many and how they were used? If you can't, you must be making it up, again.

 

As I understand it the National Guard wasn't there because someone thought there wouldn't be any need for them, and the force actually there was insufficient to prevent the invasion. One could come up with a theory about that, if one wanted to.

The theory you have in mind has been debunked. 

[johng]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

who told the Proud Boys and other militia groups about the plan to storm the Capitol?

 

FBI ?   CIA ?  Hong Kong Phooey ?

[Danderman123]

12 minutes ago, johng said:

 

FBI ?   CIA ?  Hong Kong Phooey ?

You really think the Proud Boys stormed the Capitol because the FBI told them to?

 

Or are you just filling space because you don't like the answer to the question of who told the Proud Boys to storm the Capitol?