Jingthing Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, Nick Carter icp said: Were in charges bought before the ICJ ? When pigs fly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, freeworld said: It has been denounced and the legal experts have explained why hamas is not been prosecuted in the icj. SA did not denounce Hamas in court. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said: Were in charges bought before the ICJ ? Watch the South Africa case. They explained it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tropicalevo Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 3 hours ago, expat_4_life said: Me thinks you have not been paying attention to the UN votes in the Security Council and General Assembly over a variety of resolutions regarding the conflict and the growing calls internationally for a cease-fire. I call it increasingly isolated, you can split hairs and call it what you wish. Methinks that one should consider the membership of the UN. There are 56 Muslim nations - most, if not all, anti Jewish. There is 1 Jewish nation. Votes are likely to be a tad biased against the Jews??? 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Tropicalevo said: Methinks that one should consider the membership of the UN. There are 56 Muslim nations - most, if not all, anti Jewish. There is 1 Jewish nation. Votes are likely to be a tad biased against the Jews??? Wildly biased and that's an objective fact. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, freeworld said: Watch the South Africa case. They explained it. They just want to prop up their pathetic brand. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 8 minutes ago, Jingthing said: Crickets no doubt. The icj case is not about crickets. Its about Israels actions in Gaza since the atrocity that was commited on Israel on the 7th October. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, freeworld said: The icj case is not about crickets. Its about Israels actions in Gaza since the atrocity that was commited on Israel on the 7th October. Today it is also about Hamas actions using Gazan civilians as human shields and deliberately sacrificing them. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said: Today it is also about Hamas actions using Gazan civilians as human shields and deliberately sacrificing them. Let the legal experts deliver their statements and the court will decide. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, freeworld said: Let the legal experts deliver their statements and the court will decide. Deflection, why discuss if that's going to be the response, we could all say that: 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Carter icp Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 16 minutes ago, freeworld said: Watch the South Africa case. They explained it. Well the answer to my question was a NO , I don't need anyone to explain to me what NO means 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said: Well the answer to my question was a NO , I don't need anyone to explain to me what NO means OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: Deflection, why discuss if that's going to be the response, we could all say that: What deflection? It is not compulsory to answer the way you expect and its an open forum to comment. Edited January 12 by freeworld 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beautifulthailand99 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said: Speaking of South Africa and Jews South Africa had 120 000 Jews in the 1970's and about half of them have left South Africa and moved to other Countries and theres about 60 000 Jews left in South Africa and a significant amount left South Africa and moved to Israel . They probably missed an apartheid state being mostly white. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, freeworld said: What deflection? It is not compulsory to answer the way you expect and its an open forum to comment. The very deflection I pointed out to this post: 14 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: Today it is also about Hamas actions using Gazan civilians as human shields and deliberately sacrificing them. 12 minutes ago, freeworld said: Let the legal experts deliver their statements and the court will decide. Here's a little more on todays hearing: 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said: The very deflection I pointed out to this post: Here's a little more on todays hearing: Have not seen any of it, away from home since morning. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, freeworld said: Have not seen any of it, away from home since morning. It's only just started. Hague time. Lasts for 3 hours. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeworld Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, Bkk Brian said: It's only just started. Hague time. Lasts for 3 hours. When I get home this evening will catchup with it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Just now, freeworld said: When I get home this evening will catchup with it then. Ok, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Catton Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 43 minutes ago, Jingthing said: The court of Catton has spoken! Everyone entitled to their own opinions until the hammer hits the gavel, Watching the rebuttal by the Israel defence team live on "Al Jazeera". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Carter icp Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 South African Government reserves 80 % of its jobs for Black people . Does the Isreali Government have similar policies or giving jobs to people of a certain race ? White South Africans are forbidden to apply for 80 % of the jobs 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Paul Catton said: Everyone entitled to their own opinions until the hammer hits the gavel, Watching the rebuttal by the Israel defence team live on "Al Jazeera". There will be no hammer hitting any gravel either way for a few years yet 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Morch Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Paul Catton said: Everyone entitled to their own opinions until the hammer hits the gavel, Watching the rebuttal by the Israel defence team live on "Al Jazeera". That's another nothing comment. If the court dismissed the complaint, would that alter the opinions of anti-Israeli posters on here? I doubt it. Similarly, if the court sides with South Africa's move, would pro-Israeli posters change their positions? Doubtful as well. Maybe in your fantasies people change their minds when the hammer hits the gavel. In real life, no so much. And that's without getting into questions such as seeing the court, process and so on as impartial, legit and so on. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post proton Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 How many arabs and muslims are living in this genocidal anti muslim country of Israel- about 2 million, stop with the fantasy accusations 18% of Israels population is muslim https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Israel 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 8 minutes ago, proton said: How many arabs and muslims are living in this genocidal anti muslim country of Israel- about 2 million, stop with the fantasy accusations 18% of Israels population is muslim https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Israel Over a thousand Israeli Arabs fighting with the IDF in Gaza too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post CG1 Blue Posted January 12 Popular Post Share Posted January 12 Is this the same South Africa that's in bed with Putin? The same South Africa that abstains from votes against Russia's invasion of Ukraine? South Africa seem to be part of this alliance between Russia/Iran and others. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/6/2/a-russian-love-affair-why-south-africa-stays-neutral-on-war Cape Town, South Africa – In April, a delegation of senior officials of South Africa’s ruling African National Congress (ANC) undertook what the party said was an invitation from “a long-standing ally”, Russia’s ruling party. It travelled to Moscow to discuss what the ANC said was the “recalibration of the global order”. In October, South Africa abstained, like many other African countries, in a United Nations General Assembly vote condemning the Russian invasion of Ukraine which began in February 2022; there were 143 votes in favour of the resolution. https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231220-russian-israeli-relations-crumble-over-gaza-war-analysts Now, Russia's President Vladimir Putin is among Israel's loudest critics and has refused to denounce Hamas's bloody October 7 attack. Instead, his war against Ukraine has driven Russia into a different coupling, this time with Israel's sworn enemy Iran. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beautifulthailand99 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 This legal expert in conversation with Andrew Marr thinks Israel will lose. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bkk Brian Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 9 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said: This legal expert in conversation with Andrew Marr thinks Israel will lose. Francis Boyle pro Iran lover, what do you expect from such an anti-Semitic, anti Zionist, Pro Palestinian advocate. Not even heard the defence case from Israel and already claims they've lost.................. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 11 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said: This legal expert in conversation with Andrew Marr thinks Israel will lose. The legal expert is a long standing Israel hater, Zionist hater and borderline antisemite. Considering he's been advising the Palestinians on many past occasions, I'm not sure why someone would expect him to say otherwise. So far, I don't see how his advice benefited them, but maybe this time... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beautifulthailand99 Posted January 12 Share Posted January 12 Turns out that Israel has an 'interesting' relationship in the round with South Africa. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/feb/07/southafrica.israel For decades, the Zionist Federation and Jewish Board of Deputies in South Africa honoured men such as Percy Yutar, who prosecuted Nelson Mandela for sabotage and conspiracy against the state in 1963 and sent him to jail for life (in the event, he served 27 years). Yutar went on to become attorney general of the Orange Free State and then of the Transvaal. He was elected president of Johannesburg's largest orthodox synagogue. Some Jewish leaders hailed him as a "credit to the community" and a symbol of the Jews' contribution to South Africa. Israel was openly critical of apartheid through the 1950s and 60s as it built alliances with post-colonial African governments. But most African states broke ties after the 1973 Yom Kippur war and the government in Jerusalem began to take a more benign view of the isolated regime in Pretoria. The relationship changed so profoundly that, in 1976, Israel invited the South African prime minister, John Vorster - a former Nazi sympathiser and a commander of the fascist Ossewabrandwag that sided with Hitler - to make a state visit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now