Jump to content

Israel shows ‘chilling’ intent to commit genocide in Gaza, South Africa tells UN court


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, freeworld said:

It has been denounced and the legal experts have explained why hamas is not been prosecuted in the icj.

SA did not denounce Hamas in court.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Tropicalevo said:

Methinks that one should consider the membership of the UN.

There are 56 Muslim nations - most, if not all, anti Jewish.

There is 1 Jewish nation.

Votes are likely to be a tad biased against the Jews???

Wildly biased and that's an objective fact.

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Crickets no doubt.

The icj case is not about crickets. Its about Israels actions in Gaza since the atrocity that was commited on Israel on the 7th October.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Bkk Brian said:

Today it is also about Hamas actions using Gazan civilians as human shields and deliberately sacrificing them.

Let the legal experts deliver their statements and the court will decide.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, freeworld said:

Let the legal experts deliver their statements and the court will decide.

Deflection, why discuss if that's going to be the response, we could all say that:

 

 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  Well the answer to my question was a NO , I don't need anyone to explain to me what NO means 

OK.

 

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Deflection, why discuss if that's going to be the response, we could all say that:

 

 

What deflection? It is not compulsory to answer the way you expect and its an open forum to comment.

Edited by freeworld
  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Speaking of South Africa and Jews 

South Africa had 120 000 Jews in the 1970's and about half of them have left South Africa and moved to other Countries and theres about 60 000 Jews left in South Africa and a significant amount left South Africa and moved to Israel . 

They probably missed an apartheid state being mostly white.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

The very deflection I pointed out to this post:

 

 

Here's a little more on todays hearing:

 

 

 

Have not seen any of it, away from home since morning.

  • Confused 2
Posted
Just now, freeworld said:

Have not seen any of it, away from home since morning.

It's only just started. Hague time. Lasts for 3 hours.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

The court of Catton has spoken!

Everyone entitled to their own opinions until the hammer hits the gavel, Watching the rebuttal by the Israel defence team live on "Al Jazeera". 

  • Confused 1
Posted

South African Government  reserves 80 % of its jobs for Black people .

Does the Isreali Government have similar policies or giving jobs to people of a certain race ?

White South Africans are forbidden to apply for 80 % of the jobs 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Paul Catton said:

Everyone entitled to their own opinions until the hammer hits the gavel, Watching the rebuttal by the Israel defence team live on "Al Jazeera". 

There will be no hammer hitting any gravel either way for a few years yet

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

This legal expert in conversation with Andrew Marr thinks Israel will lose.

 

 

Francis Boyle pro Iran lover, what do you expect from such an anti-Semitic, anti Zionist, Pro Palestinian advocate. Not even heard the defence case from Israel and already claims they've lost..................

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

This legal expert in conversation with Andrew Marr thinks Israel will lose.

 

 

 

The legal expert is a long standing Israel hater, Zionist hater and borderline antisemite. Considering he's been advising the Palestinians on many past occasions, I'm not sure why someone would expect him to say otherwise. So far, I don't see how his advice benefited them, but maybe this time...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Turns out that Israel has an 'interesting' relationship in the round with South Africa.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/feb/07/southafrica.israel

 

For decades, the Zionist Federation and Jewish Board of Deputies in South Africa honoured men such as Percy Yutar, who prosecuted Nelson Mandela for sabotage and conspiracy against the state in 1963 and sent him to jail for life (in the event, he served 27 years). Yutar went on to become attorney general of the Orange Free State and then of the Transvaal. He was elected president of Johannesburg's largest orthodox synagogue. Some Jewish leaders hailed him as a "credit to the community" and a symbol of the Jews' contribution to South Africa.

 

Israel was openly critical of apartheid through the 1950s and 60s as it built alliances with post-colonial African governments. But most African states broke ties after the 1973 Yom Kippur war and the government in Jerusalem began to take a more benign view of the isolated regime in Pretoria. The relationship changed so profoundly that, in 1976, Israel invited the South African prime minister, John Vorster - a former Nazi sympathiser and a commander of the fascist Ossewabrandwag that sided with Hitler - to make a state visit.

 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...