Jump to content

Israel is at War - General discussion (pt3)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I will not be dragged into a bickering session.

Because you prefer to deflect facts:

 

Israel Accused of Organ Harvesting by Group Tied to Hamas Support Network
On 29 December 2023, the Jerusalem Post reported on allegations by the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor (Euromed) accusing Israel of harvesting organs from Hamas terrorists. These claims emerged after the Gaza Government Media Office reported that bodies returned by the IDF to Gaza were missing vital organs. Euromed cited these incidents as part of a pattern, referring to past allegations against Israel for similar actions. Despite these claims, Israeli officials have consistently denied any involvement in organ harvesting, stating that these accusations are baseless and unverified. Euromed is based in Geneva and was founded and currently chaired by Ramy Abdu, a Palestinian who has been affiliated with Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas support groups such as serving as spokesman for  the European Campaign to End the Siege on Gaza. Swiss Ennahda activist Ridha Ajmi once served as an officer. Euromed is currently headed by Richard Falk, one-time UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Occupied Palestine.

https://www.global-influence-ops.com/israel-accused-of-organ-harvesting-by-group-tied-to-hamas-support-network/

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   UNwatch oppose Anti Semitism .

Are you in favour of their anti Semitic stance or do you oppose their Anti Semitic stance ? 

Do you stand with UNWatch on this issue ?

 

I have already explained in this thread how, IMO, the notion of antisemitism is used politically in this context. You and I disagree on the core issue and I have no interest in debating it with you now when all my points have been clearly expressed and sourced across the 70+ pages of this thread.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

I will not be dragged into a bickering session.

 

   You did appear to be being negative  about a group because they oppose Anti Semitism and they oppose  Anti Israel biasedness .

  So it stands to reason that you are in favour of Anti Semitism  and groups who are biased against Israel .

   *That group are appalling, they oppose Anti -Semitism* 🙂

Edited by Nick Carter icp
Changed Derogatory to negative
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Anything can be debated and "defended" for prolonged periods, provided one has the time to devote to it (which I don't, to be honest). So no, not deflecting, just cutting short because I have to go do other stuff. I believe my views are clear (as are yours).

 

People can read the material I refer to, as they can yours.

No deflecting the facts brought up about Euro Med. Period. They are run by Hamas supporters and promoters of  antisemitism. Are you denying that?

Edited by Bkk Brian
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bkk Brian said:

No deflecting the facts brought up about Euro Med. Period. They are run by Hamas supporters and antiemetics. Are you denying that?

 

The article I posted initially about the IDF seemed pretty accurate to me. Regarding the alleged antisemitism of EuroMed, I will look into it tomorrow and get back to you. Now I really need to go.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rattlesnake said:

 

The article I posted initially about the IDF seemed pretty accurate to me. Regarding the alleged antisemitism of EuroMed, I will look into it tomorrow and get back to you. Now I really need to go.

I've already posted it, you've already read it or did you ignore all my posts, what a waste of time you are and another huge deflection

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

"Derogatory" is excessive, 

 

   Fair enough , I couldn't think of a more fitting word .

Having a longer think about it , 

Maybe "Negative" would have been the better word to use .

I'll go back and change the word to "negative", if I can 

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

If you consider me to be a waste of time, you may want to consider not replying to my posts when they are not even addressed to you.

 

image.png.fef490891dd866395aabb7b44555c3dc.png

I see you had time to do that but not say if you believed Euro Med are a bunch of antisemitic Hamas supporters. Telling

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

I don't need to imagine anything. I know why they have done it. Israeli officials are on record as wanting to remove the Palestinian population out of Gaza as they believe the entirety of the land belongs to Israel. Additionally, we have seen the mass displacement caused by the indiscriminate use of high explosive bombs and wanton destruction of Palestinian homes, schools and hospitals plus the use of starvation to displace them.

 

This is clear an unequivocal ethnic cleansing and  is the reason that the ICJ has decided to take up the complaint by SA.

 

Another example of intellectually dishonest sleazy posting tactics.

Yes some Israeli officials have said such horrible things.

True.

Instead you imply that means that is Israeli government policy.

Those are two different things.

It would be like take statements from American "politicians" like Marjorie Taylor Greene and asserting they represent actual U.S. government policy.

I think it's legitimate to be very concerned that the most right wing forces in Israel will eventually prevail, but that again is very different than asserting that has already happened.

I don't know and neither do you, but I do not expect that all of the Palestinian population will be removed from Gaza, any more than the 20 percent of Arab Israeli citizens will be removed from Israel.

Please be more honest in your posting tactics and you might actually gain some credibility.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

You should be a politician. You know ozimoron is correct, you don't like it so accuse him if lies. 

It is Israeli policy. 

Did you see the kids singing about taking Gaza? On Israeli state TV!! 

You know Netanyahu wants all Gazans out, stop trying to twist facts. 

 

That horrible song on TV does NOT prove in any way whatsoever that it is official Israel government policy to clear Gaza of all Palestinians!

STOP LYING.

You know, I kind of feel that the obsessive Israeli demonization brigade WISHES their worse accusations against Israel turn out to be true so that their hatred of Israel spreads even wider than it already has.

As many have said including me, there are two wars. The war war and the propaganda war. Israel was always going to win the war war. But Hamas is winning the propaganda war. That was their aim all along.

 

To wit:

 

How the spectacle of Palestinian terrorism changed the world | The Hill

 

You don’t need to be a terrorism expert to read the tea leaves about this. Hamas welcomes the high number of dead civilians to create international condemnation of Israel. That same calculus is at work when Hamas fires rockets from hospitals, schools and apartment buildings inviting devastating Israeli responses.  

The violence of the Palestinian cause is thus one the world seems to find consistent sympathy for, despite the utter barbarism of Hamas’s strategy and tactics. A far better approach would be to actively help the Palestinian people resist Hamas’s cynical strategy to use Israel to continually “keep Palestinians radicalized . . .

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2024 at 1:34 PM, Neeranam said:

Interesting. I know a Rabbi that is a naturalized Thai. I know Sikhhs that have got Thai citizenship by birth and get equal rights. 

Do you know know any non-Jew who got Israeli citizenship by naturalization?

Maybe @Bkk Brian does? 

 

   Is that you best friend Rabbi spiritual advisor who is now Thai ?

Did you both convert to Thai and then he converted to Jew and you thought about following him to convert to be Jewish ?

  Do you both have any plans to convert to something else ?

Cosplaying seems to be the thing nowadays 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   There are 650 UK M.P's and it was signed by 107 M.P's and there are over 800 Peers .

So, it was signed by 130 of the 1450 M.P's & peers .

What is that ? 

About  8% of M.P's and Peers who signed it ?

 

 

Good, I hope they do embargo arms sales to Israel. No country should be selling arms to any country on trial for genocide.

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Israel Must Invade Rafah

No viable alternative paths exist for defeating Hamas.

 

Following the historic American abstention from the UN Security Council resolution calling for an Israel–Hamas ceasefire in Gaza for the duration of Ramadan, the West is waiting to see how the situation develops on the ground. But with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu signaling that a full-scale invasion of Rafah to take out Hamas’s final stronghold will indeed commence, it’s worth examining what makes the United States’s abstention so significant and how it will affect Israel’s war effort, if at all.

 

 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/israel-must-invade-rafah

 

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Israel Must Invade Rafah

No viable alternative paths exist for defeating Hamas.

 

Following the historic American abstention from the UN Security Council resolution calling for an Israel–Hamas ceasefire in Gaza for the duration of Ramadan, the West is waiting to see how the situation develops on the ground. But with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu signaling that a full-scale invasion of Rafah to take out Hamas’s final stronghold will indeed commence, it’s worth examining what makes the United States’s abstention so significant and how it will affect Israel’s war effort, if at all.

 

 

https://www.city-journal.org/article/israel-must-invade-rafah

 

 

The obvious choice is the ICJ. Israel just needs to follow the majority of countries and sign up. If the population is expelled to Egypt then Hamas will go with them, achieving exactly nothing.

Edited by ozimoron
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ozimoron said:

 

Those are the war cabinet. How is that not official policy? These are the extreme right wing faction that keeps Netanyahu in power and out of jail.

 

Forced displacement of even 20% of the citizens would amount to ethnic cleansing. Note that they don't want to go, that's what makes it ethnic cleansing.

So you're being a little more honest now.

There is no current policy to have Gaza be Arab free (as Hamas policy IS a Jew free Gaza).

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   There are 650 UK M.P's and it was signed by 107 M.P's and there are over 800 Peers .

So, it was signed by 130 of the 1450 M.P's & peers .

What is that ? 

About  8% of M.P's and Peers who signed it ?

 

Yes not including those facts was a form of intentional misinformation.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...