15 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

It's better to be a fool than a ravager. 

I suppose you support the Moscow killers too, ISIS linked, that did it for money...😬

8 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Hamas terrorists are both

 Palestinians are exposed to terrorism every day. You don't know whether you will be beaten or killed while walking on the street...

 

Israel a 'terrorist state, apartheid regime', son of Israeli general says

 

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israel-a-terrorist-state-apartheid-regime-son-of-israeli-general-says/3062836

1 minute ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Refuse vs. not respect. You are smart, you understand the nuance.

Stop playing games and look at our string of posts

 

18 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

to annihilate the enemies of Israel, including children, babies, animals, men, women.

Holy words, so reminiscent of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, etc.

 

 

8 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Although that story is different to this story . God may have told King Saul to annihilate the enemies of Israel, but Netanyahu told the IDF to annihilate Hamas

 

Regardless of interpretations, he is a political leader who projects himself – and bases his policies – on messianic Biblical prophecies, the Torah and advice from rabbis.

 

Now I will get back on topic.

3 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

 Palestinians are exposed to terrorism every day. You don't know whether you will be beaten or killed while walking on the street...

So it was the Israelis who slaughtered men, women and children on October 7? Holy cow!

3 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Stop playing games and look at our string of posts

 

 

For the last time:

I did not say that Israel would not agree to a deal, I said that Bibi had claimed he would not be respecting said deal by attacking Rafah no matter what.

You overinterpreted what I said, it happens, no worries, let's move on.

Just now, rattlesnake said:

 

For the last time:

I did not say that Israel would not agree to a deal, I said that Bibi had claimed he would not be respecting said deal by attacking Rafah no matter what.

You overinterpreted what I said, it happens, no worries, let's move on.

You can state all you want, its in black and white:

 

30 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Although that story is different to this story . God may have told King Saul to annihilate the enemies of Israel, but Netanyahu told the IDF to annihilate Hamas

And how is that different than "this story"? 

14 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

So it was the Israelis who slaughtered men, women and children on October 7? Holy cow!

No, that was Hamas, Israelis have slaughtered women and children almost every day for the past 6 months. 

 

24 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yes I know you do, but I told you before I don't care what you want. I want Hamas eliminated so no other Oct 7th occur.

If the state of Israel was eliminated, there would be no repeat of Oct 7 either, right? 

19 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Everybody wants the war finished when all has been achieved, not just Trump

A charitable reading at best - Israel has never looked more alone on the world stage than it does now, and cheerleaders for the rage bombing on Gaza have played their part in that outcome with applause at the Security Council  outcome and an unprecedented US abstention.

 

 

25 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Refuse vs. not respect. You are smart, you understand the nuance.

Well, I agree with the first half of your statement... 

22 minutes ago, transam said:

I suppose you support the Moscow killers too, ISIS linked, that did it for money...😬

No, I do not support those who killed all those people in Moscow recently. But, of course, that was not nearly as many as the IDF have killed in Gaza.

3 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

A charitable reading at best - Israel has never looked more alone on the world stage than it does now, and cheerleaders for the rage bombing on Gaza have played their part in that outcome with applause at the Security Council  outcome and an unprecedented US abstention.

 

 

There is a topic for that with all the factual details unlike your commentary version

 

UNSC passes resolutions ‘an immediate ceasefire’ 'unconditional release of hostages'

https://aseannow.com/topic/1323270-unsc-passes-resolutions-‘an-immediate-ceasefire’-unconditional-release-of-hostages

23 minutes ago, Ben Zioner said:

Holy words, so reminiscent of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden, etc.

 

 

Oh, no, not another. "Others have annihilated people in the past, so it's okay for Israel to do it now."

6 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

If the state of Israel was eliminated, there would be no repeat of Oct 7 either, right? 

Told you many times, I don't play word games with you right?

24 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

So it was the Israelis who slaughtered men, women and children on October 7? Holy cow!

No, it was Hamas on Oct 7. It was the IDF on Oct 8 and onward to today. 

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

Oh, no, not another. "Others have annihilated people in the past, so it's okay for Israel to do it now."

Not at all. When under attack from bloodthirsty, inhumane masses it is our duty to destroy them, hence the destruction of those cities, and Gaza.

1 minute ago, WDSmart said:

No, it was Hamas on Oct 7. It was the IDF on Oct 8 and onward to today. 

Also, it was the IDF on many occasions before Oct 7.  It's rather pathetic how a couple here keep saying this conflict started last Oct. 

1 minute ago, Ben Zioner said:

Not at all. When under attack from bloodthirsty, inhumane masses it is our duty to destroy them, hence the destruction of those cities, and Gaza.

Whose duty? Certainly not mine. 

7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

There is a topic for that with all the factual details unlike your commentary version

 

UNSC passes resolutions ‘an immediate ceasefire’ 'unconditional release of hostages'

https://aseannow.com/topic/1323270-unsc-passes-resolutions-‘an-immediate-ceasefire’-unconditional-release-of-hostages

So does that mean "an immediate ceasefire" is not a condition of the "unconditional release of the hostages"?

1 minute ago, WDSmart said:

No, it was Hamas on Oct 7. It was the IDF on Oct 8 and onward to today. 

On Oct 7th was the aggressors' invasion and executions, Oct 8th Israel put its boots on..

 

The antisemite keeps twisting the facts......

1 minute ago, Neeranam said:

Also, it was the IDF on many occasions before Oct 7.  It's rather pathetic how a couple here keep saying this conflict started last Oct. 

Oh, no.................😬

Just now, WDSmart said:

So does that mean "an immediate ceasefire" is not a condition of the "unconditional release of the hostages"?

😴....tedious baiting go to the topic and read

2 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

No, it was Hamas on Oct 7. It was the IDF on Oct 8 and onward to today. 

And one would not be happening without the other, Israels operation at the moment can only be described as work in progress, when the hostages have been returned and the threat of another 7/10 has been minimised then all parties can go back to their day jobs. HTH

Every cloud and that. Some can't resist thieving land when the opportunity arises.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68650815

 

Just ask Daniella Weiss, 78, the grandmother of Israel's settler movement, who says she already has a list of 500 families ready to move to Gaza immediately.

"I have friends in Tel Aviv," she says, "so they say, 'Don't forget to keep for me a plot near the coast in Gaza,' because it's a beautiful, beautiful coast, beautiful golden sand".

5 minutes ago, Ben Zioner said:

Not at all. When under attack from bloodthirsty, inhumane masses it is our duty to destroy them, hence the destruction of those cities, and Gaza.

Yes and don't spare the horses when relieving Rafa from the terrorists.👍

5 minutes ago, Wobblybob said:

And one would not be happening without the other, Israels operation at the moment can only be described as work in progress, when the hostages have been returned and the threat of another 7/10 has been minimised then all parties can go back to their day jobs. HTH

Yes, that's the childish "He hit me first!" excuse. I acknowledge a response to Oct 7 was warranted, but it's now way past time for a settlement to this "war."

1 minute ago, WDSmart said:

A (censored - term I have been forbidden to use on this topic) who keeps citing a one-sided viewpoint and considers any other perspective as "twisted." 

You would...........🙄

 

I suppose you wouldn't want Hitlers Nazi's killed either, or ISIS cut-throats, eh.....?