New e-Visa fees predicted to start tomorrow for all nationalities?

[Pattaya57]

Sydney released the new e-visa system today and they included a list of all the visa fees. No change, still $60 for a tourist visa

 

[Bvor]

2 hours ago, Pattaya57 said:

Sydney released the new e-visa system today and they included a list of all the visa fees. No change, still $60 for a tourist visa

given that sydney has replaced the previous $60 tourist visa with the new evisa system it would seem that the 19 January 2023 list of visa fees has been somewhat invalidated.

bearing in mind NZ and other countries evisa fee requirements can anyone confirm what sydney/canberra evisa fee requirements is.

[Pattaya57]

5 hours ago, Bvor said:

given that sydney has replaced the previous $60 tourist visa with the new evisa system it would seem that the 19 January 2023 list of visa fees has been somewhat invalidated.

bearing in mind NZ and other countries evisa fee requirements can anyone confirm what sydney/canberra evisa fee requirements is.

The list of fees I provided is included on the new e-visa info page so no the fees are not invalidated. Tourist E-visa is listed at $60

 

https://sydney.thaiembassy.org/en/content/visa-information-visa-fees

 

Edited March 19 by Pattaya57

[Bvor]

19 minutes ago, Pattaya57 said:

The list of fees I provided is included on the new e-visa info page so no the fees are not invalidated 

which would make the australian evisa single entry tourist visa a lot less than the NZ $300 fee and the "all others" USD $82 fee.

lt is what it is i spose.

cheers! 

[DrJack54]

8 hours ago, Pattaya57 said:

Sydney released the new e-visa system today and they included a list of all the visa fees. No change, still $60 for a tourist visa

Thanks for update. 

Making NZ charges seem ridiculous or serious error. 

Even more so when a 3 month multi to Vietnam is 50 usd 

[Smokin Joe]

7 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

Thanks for update. 

Making NZ charges seem ridiculous or serious error. 

Even more so when a 3 month multi to Vietnam is 50 usd 

 

Maybe this is in response to Thais being charged $211 NZD for an NZ Tourist Visa

[mstevens]

4 hours ago, Smokin Joe said:

 

Maybe this is in response to Thais being charged $211 NZD for an NZ Tourist Visa

 

What does Australia charge a Thai national for a tourist visa?

[Kiwifarang]

4 hours ago, Smokin Joe said:

 

Maybe this is in response to Thais being charged $211 NZD for an NZ Tourist Visa

So given a US tourist visa is $185 USD / $305 NZD (approx) we can expect a Thai Visa in the USA to cost the same as a Thai visa in New Zealand. $5 cheaper than the US charge, but $89 more than NZ charges?

 

Actually, come to think of it $300 NZD is weirdly similar to what the USA charges everyone including Thai. Is that what they have based the price on?

[alex8912]

On 3/18/2024 at 9:20 PM, Kiwifarang said:

That's right, each to their own, due each having a different set of circumstance. No two people are exactly the same and indeed some are far in a way different to each other. There are a million and one possibilities as to why someone would want a base.

 

For 8 or 9 months your base is wherever you are. You don't need some formal base and if you really needed one Malaysia and other countries give many people 90 days NO VISA. I agree with the other poster. Not needed at all. 

[george]

On 3/20/2024 at 10:04 AM, mstevens said:

 

What does Australia charge a Thai national for a tourist visa?

 

This is just politics playing out. NZ got pissed off and priced the visa fees to similar to what Thais pays for visa to NZ.

 

When Thai govt found out the visa fee increase in NZ, and the two prime ministers quickly met and talked about free visas. Diplomacy at high level... 55555

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1321663-new-zealand-and-thailand-discussing-visa-free-access/

 

[sandyf]

On 3/18/2024 at 8:54 PM, Bday Prang said:

What does that actually mean ? if you don't mind me asking     Why would anybody need a "base"   in Thailand if travelling around Asia ?  and  what form would this "base " take?  would you maintain some form of rented accommodation here whilst day   tripping   (or longer) to Laos and Cambodia     sounds a bit bizarre to me but each to their own

Years ago it was quite a common practice with low accommodation prices and saved lugging all belongings around. When the tsunami struck quite a few accommodation providers never saw some of their customers again.

Unfortunately inflation has taken it's toll and not so viable these days.

[mstevens]

16 hours ago, george said:

 

This is just politics playing out. NZ got pissed off and priced the visa fees to similar to what Thais pays for visa to NZ.

 

When Thai govt found out the visa fee increase in NZ, and the two prime ministers quickly met and talked about free visas. Diplomacy at high level... 55555

 

https://aseannow.com/topic/1321663-new-zealand-and-thailand-discussing-visa-free-access/

 

 

Where on earth did you get the idea that NZ got pissed off and priced visa fees at what Thais pay to visit NZ? This is 100% factually wrong. New Zealand does NOT price visas different for different nationalities and there has been no change in the price of visas to New Zealand recently, and certainly there is no pricing according to nationality.

[Pattaya57]

On 3/20/2024 at 8:57 AM, Smokin Joe said:

 

Maybe this is in response to Thais being charged $211 NZD for an NZ Tourist Visa

Thai can get a 9 month tourist visa to NZ for that NZ$211. How is that justification for Thailand to charge NZ$300 for a 60 day tourist visa?

 

Edited March 23 by Pattaya57

[JayClay]

On 3/19/2024 at 11:02 AM, Bday Prang said:

So renting a place in Bangkok for 9 months would be cheaper than paying the cost of checked luggage on a few  short trip flights

 

If they intend to use Bangkok as thier base, and spend a significant amount of time there then, yes, renting and apartment for 9 months would be significantly cheaper than staying in hotels for 9 months and playing luggage fees on top of that.

 

Additionally, some people would presumably be happy to pay extra for the convenience of not having to pack and unpack multiple times throughout their stay, even if they weren't intending to spend a significant amount of time in Bangkok.

 

Do you really find it that hard to comprehend that other people do things differently to the way you do?

[Pattaya57]

Could probably close this thread as false news 😉

[Bday Prang]

6 hours ago, JayClay said:

 

If they intend to use Bangkok as thier base, and spend a significant amount of time there then, yes, renting and apartment for 9 months would be significantly cheaper than staying in hotels for 9 months and playing luggage fees on top of that.

 

Additionally, some people would presumably be happy to pay extra for the convenience of not having to pack and unpack multiple times throughout their stay, even if they weren't intending to spend a significant amount of time in Bangkok.

 

Do you really find it that hard to comprehend that other people do things differently to the way you do?

What part of "each to their own" do you have difficulty comprehending,?   Furthermore     you appear to be arguing purely  for the sake of it, and   on behalf of other  imaginary,  hypothetical people,   "they"    "some people"   "other people"  "somebody"  "you"    what's   all that about ?   

[Maestro]

Toplc closed. For over a week since this topic started, No-one from a country other than New Zealand has come forward and posted that the visa fees have been increased.