Jump to content

'Openly Jewish' man threatened with arrest by Police near pro-Palestine march


Social Media

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

It is, of course no surprise that you are a cheerleader for the Met police.

 

Everyone loves a police force that shares their belief system. 

I’m not a Cheerleader for the Met nor do I have any romantic feelings for the organization.

 

I simply pointed out you had fabricated the events you portrayed in your post.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

 

Excellent comment; can you imagine the furore if a police officer told someone not to walk in a certain part of London, under the threat of arrest, because they were openly muslim.

 

Khan would be incandescent, and summon his poodle, Sir Mark Rowley, demanding that the officer was dismissed and prosecuted. It would be lead story on the BBC news for a minimum of 5 consecutive days, and that whimpering little slug at the Guardian, Owen Jones would need a defibrillator ….. the Islamification of the UK continues to gather pace.

 

 

 

There’s a lot of imagining going on.

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

You certainly share their "belief system" if we can politely refer to it as such.

 

 

Plenty of evidence has been provided. The police themselves have even apologised.

Jonny,

 

When you assert I share the belief system of the Met you need to do two things.

 

1. Provide evidence the belief system exists and is that of the Met.

 

2. Provide evidence that I share that same belief system.

 

You have done neither, so forgive me for concluding you were simply making a baseless personal attack. 
 

The police have very rightly apologized.

 

But they have not apologized for the incident you fabricated:

 

Even the Met police will move you on if you refuse to hide your "Jewishness". 
 

Nobody was moved on for ‘refusing to hide their Jewishness’.

 

The response to this ought not to be another personal attack.

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Jonny,

 

When you assert I share the belief system of the Met you need to do two things.

 

1. Provide evidence the belief system exists and is that of the Met.

 

2. Provide evidence that I share that same belief system.

 

You have done neither, so forgive me for concluding you were simply making a baseless personal attack. 
 

The police have very rightly apologized.

 

But they have not apologized for the incident you fabricated:

 

Even the Met police will move you on if you refuse to hide your "Jewishness". 
 

Nobody was moved on for ‘refusing to hide their Jewishness’.

 

The response to this ought not to be another personal attack.

And todays word of the day is.........fabricated.

You are not the victim here......the lone Jew is!

  • Confused 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Brickleberry said:

 

She is quite well known in the UK, she is the former home secretary, and a current conservative MP.

 

Zionist': Suella Braverman ...

 

...and a pretty awful example of a human being.

  • Confused 3
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wobblybob said:

Correct, but why wasn't there enough cops there, surely the fault lies with the police and specifically Sir Mark Rowley, let's not blame one solitary Jew for the inactions of a police force that is as much use as a chocolate fireguard! 

 

How many cops weren't there bob?

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

As I said before, being Jewish in London is a precarious situation. 

 

Even the Met police will move you on if you refuse to hide your "Jewishness". That's if they are not too busy chanting pro Palestine songs. 

 

How long before we have legislation criminalizing being ooenly Jewish in a public place?

 

Anti semitism is making quite the comeback. Expect it to get worse under a Labour government. The only hope is for Khan to be ousted as Mayor.

 

So, based on your last sentence, there's absolutely no hope.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wobblybob said:

And todays word of the day is.........fabricated.

You are not the victim here......the lone Jew is!

Todays word of the day is fabricated because there’s a lot of fabricated accounts of reality going on.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wobblybob said:
16 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Clueless.

 

 

Absolutely clueless.

 

Call other posters of which you are guilty, you are the one who deliberately crops posts to change their context. Am I the poster you have chosen to flame today. Stop trying to make me the topic and get a life and better still get back on topic!

 

I have openly and publicly apologized to the forum and the forum member for the singular post cropping.

 

But not to worry @Wobblybob, I'm not expecting you to apologize for being relentlessly clueless.

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

I have openly and publicly apologized to the forum and the forum member for the singular post cropping.

 

But not to worry @Wobblybob, I'm not expecting you to apologize for being relentlessly clueless.

 

Stop trolling and flaming people and try and post something about the topic.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2024 at 7:49 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

Perhaps the question should have asked ‘what will the police do with the new powers in the recent changes to policing laws’

 

Before passing the laws.

 

That said, had the officer not intervened and the ‘breach of the peace’ he was concerned over had occurred, we’d be reading about something a lot more disturbing than a bit of activist performative grandstanding.


 

 

 

well said. and as for the calling the guy an idiot, interestingly enough, Wilki defines 'Idiot' as someone FOOLISH. It goes on to look at the historic use of the term, before everything became so (deleted) up:

quote:

'Idiot' was formerly a technical term in legal and psychiatric contexts for some kinds of profound intellectual disability where the mental age is two years or less, and the person cannot guard themself against common physical dangers. To stretch the point - it's okay to refer to this guy as an idiot because he was foolish enough to not guard himself against the obvious dangers of walking into someone's fist.

Edited by paddypower
  • Confused 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/20/2024 at 11:52 AM, Nick Carter icp said:

 

  If you scroll back to the previous page , you will see that there have been severe warnings about mis gendering people 

misgendering. ? I wouldn't mind doing a bit of miss-gendering to Suella to get her sorted out.

Edited by paddypower
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, paddypower said:

misgendering. ? I wouldn't mind doing a bit of miss-gendering to Suella to get her sorted out.

Confused? she needs a broomstick up the A. she's is so power hungry and so far right wing that she probably has a copy of Mein Kampf under her pillow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.






×
×
  • Create New...