As a news source the guardian has to be about as agenda driven, sanctimonious news source on the internet. It's less credible than Snopes.
I'm not debating the actual facts of this issue I just made a comment about how it was prevented by a very unbiased new source. I'm sure that there are far more less salacious details contained within the case. The guardian is the quintessential red meat for world liberals and communists alike
What is the difference between the Walton family earning billions legitimately through a large chain of stores, and our president earning billions illegitimately through grifting and the corrupt use of the presidency?
Are you just against very rich people in general and if so why doesn't that apply to your political master and most of his Cabinet members?
Netanyahu, Pinochet, Saddam, all US Presidents that I can think of, Stalin, many right-wing Central and South American leaders... Hitler and Putin of course ..
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now