Popular Post Presto Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 1 hour ago, BobBKK said: What crime? Ask the grand juries that approved the indictments and then, if you have the time, read the indictments. 2 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Presto Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 1 hour ago, BKKKevin said: True, but sadly they can slow walk a trial or even prevent it from ever coming to trial... Garland wasted a year and a half before finally having the courage to let a special counsel going after the plotters of the failed coup. Garland, handpicked by Biden. What an embarrassment of enormous proportions. 1 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BobBKK Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 34 minutes ago, Jingthing said: You have no idea of the party affiliation of all the jurors. You lie just like your dear cult leader. I use reasoned judgment to conclude that the location of the trial is biased, that it is reasonable to speculate that the jurors are Democrats and that the selection process ensured the 'right' jurors were selected. More importantly, we know the judge is a Dem, and his daughter worked for the Dems. It's a pity that witnesses are denied to the defence, yet the porn star can rattle on for hours. 1 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BobBKK Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 23 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: Do you have a link to back up your claim that twelve Democrats are on the Jury? Do share. They come from Manhatten which voted 87% for Biden - I think it's fair to assume they are Democrats? Demographics is your friend. What is sad is people can campaign for DA based on "getting a particular person"? I can't imagine that in any other country but the USA that politically appoints judges. 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thingamabob Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 A friend who was there told me the abuse directed at Trump initially faded early on, and he was being well-received by the end if his speech. This appears to have been the case after reading through the entire article. 1 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 29 minutes ago, BobBKK said: I use reasoned judgment to conclude that the location of the trial is biased, that it is reasonable to speculate that the jurors are Democrats and that the selection process ensured the 'right' jurors were selected. More importantly, we know the judge is a Dem, and his daughter worked for the Dems. It's a pity that witnesses are denied to the defence, yet the porn star can rattle on for hours. Do you mean Trump was denied to testify? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post earlinclaifornia Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 20 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: A friend who was there told me the abuse directed at Trump initially faded early on, and he was being well-received by the end if his speech. This appears to have been the case after reading through the entire article. Interesting as all the videos I saw had him groveling to the crowd like a sad child. Did you hear the whining and the threats? Pay attention! 1 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BobBKK Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 10 minutes ago, Presto said: Do you mean Trump was denied to testify? No other witnesses were denied - why's that? 1 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Presto Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 Just now, BobBKK said: No other witnesses were denied - why's that? Despite Trump's endless statements that he was going to testify, to tell the truth, he declined at the last moment. He wasn't denied anything. 1 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 2 hours ago, BobBKK said: At least he had the guts to go - no Dem has ever accepted their invitation. No Dem was stupid enough to go. 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Danderman123 Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 28 minutes ago, Thingamabob said: A friend who was there told me the abuse directed at Trump initially faded early on, and he was being well-received by the end if his speech. This appears to have been the case after reading through the entire article. They booed him off the stage. It's all on video. Your friend lied to you. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 2 hours ago, BobBKK said: Well, that's good news, at least. No, only 12 Democrats are on the jury to decide a case where the statute of limitations has been stepped all over by a man who CAMPAIGNED on getting Trump - sounds fair, does it? Trump is just a victim. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 30 minutes ago, Presto said: Despite Trump's endless statements that he was going to testify, to tell the truth, he declined at the last moment. He wasn't denied anything. And the Judge made a specific point of informing Defendant Trump that he had and absolute right to give testimony in his own defense, expressly stating that the Partial Gag Order Defendant Trump is under placed no restrictions on his right to give testimony before the court in his own defence. Of course that testimony would be under oath and entirely at the defendant’s own volition. Trump chose not to testify. Anyone pinning hopes to his earlier promises and declarations that he would testify simply hasn’t learned the lesson that Trump’s promises are worth zilch, 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 1 hour ago, BobBKK said: I use reasoned judgment to conclude that the location of the trial is biased, that it is reasonable to speculate that the jurors are Democrats and that the selection process ensured the 'right' jurors were selected. More importantly, we know the judge is a Dem, and his daughter worked for the Dems. It's a pity that witnesses are denied to the defence, yet the porn star can rattle on for hours. The location of the trial is based on the location of where the crimes were committed, 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank83628 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 8 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: Ross Ulbricht is who Trump says he will release from prison back into the community. Tells you much of what you need to know: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Ulbricht wow, the silk road guy, yeah, proper menace to society isnt he, equal to Jeffery Dhamer! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: And the Judge made a specific point of informing Defendant Trump that he had and absolute right to give testimony in his own defense, expressly stating that the Partial Gag Order Defendant Trump is under placed no restrictions on his right to give testimony before the court in his own defence. Of course that testimony would be under oath and entirely at the defendant’s own volition. Trump chose not to testify. Anyone pinning hopes to his earlier promises and declarations that he would testify simply hasn’t learned the lesson that Trump’s promises are worth zilch, Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Presto Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 Just now, frank83628 said: wow, the silk road guy, yeah, proper menace to society isnt he, equal to Jeffery Dhamer! Well, Trump pardoned a war criminal, so you know where that goes. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 Just now, frank83628 said: wow, the silk road guy, yeah, proper menace to society isnt he, equal to Jeffery Dhamer! No, he’s convicted for the crimes he himself committed and facilitated. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank83628 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 56 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said: Interesting as all the videos I saw had him groveling to the crowd like a sad child. Did you hear the whining and the threats? Pay attention! thats probably due to the channels you watched being Biden bias 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank83628 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: No, he’s convicted for the crimes he himself committed and facilitated. running a website? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 0ffshore360 Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 55 minutes ago, BobBKK said: No other witnesses were denied - why's that? Trump's defense team were at liberty to call witnesses at will. Those they did call embarrassed them. In all probability Trump's legal reps were probably quite panicked at the possibility Trump would insist , against ardent counseling, on adding to their embarrassment. At any venue Trump now is demonstrating a defiant and seriously flawed campaign rhetoric that only appeals to his maga faithful who have no desire to comprehend truth from fiction. IMHO trump will exit some time between now and November based on some fictitious reason. Perhaps it could be called "pulling a Thaksin" ? 3 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 26 minutes ago, frank83628 said: running a website? Quit with your gaslighting already: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-sdny/legacy/2015/03/25/US v. Ross Ulbricht Indictment.pdf 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoner Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: 32 minutes ago, frank83628 said: running a website? Quit with your gaslighting already: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-sdny/legacy/2015/03/25/US v. Ross Ulbricht Indictment.pdf he also commissioned a murder. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Ulbricht did commission the murders.[46] The evidence that Ulbricht had commissioned murders was considered by the judge in sentencing Ulbricht to life and was a factor in the Second Circuit's decision to uphold the sentence.[45] 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 2 hours ago, BobBKK said: They come from Manhatten which voted 87% for Biden - I think it's fair to assume they are Democrats? Demographics is your friend. What is sad is people can campaign for DA based on "getting a particular person"? I can't imagine that in any other country but the USA that politically appoints judges. Maths not your strong point is it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presto Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 1 hour ago, stoner said: he also commissioned a murder. The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Ulbricht did commission the murders.[46] The evidence that Ulbricht had commissioned murders was considered by the judge in sentencing Ulbricht to life and was a factor in the Second Circuit's decision to uphold the sentence.[45] Ulbricht? Interesting name. I once did a job on a small East German coaster, and Ulbricht's portrait was on the wall of the captains cabin. 😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tug Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 5 hours ago, frank83628 said: there there, don't worry, i found it. adjudged by who, people like yourself? Naa I’m more of a tar and feathers kind of guy then the penitentiary for rapists bilko artists and traitors just saying……. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 3 hours ago, frank83628 said: thats probably due to the channels you watched being Biden bias Probably due to the poster watching the video. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 (edited) Now I know why some were not happy with Mr Trump or Rfkjr Less votes for biden , more for chase Oliver, the Libertarian choice ! Thanks Chase https://www.votechaseoliver.com/platform https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/27/libertarians-pick-chase-oliver-for-us-president-as-trump-kennedy-rejected Edited May 27 by riclag 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bendejo Posted May 27 Popular Post Share Posted May 27 9 hours ago, Berkshire said: I'm sure you know judges don't indict criminals. My take-away lesson from 2016 is that I will never again say "nobody is THAT stupid." "When they go low we go high." Well, that didn't work. When they go low it means next time they are going to go even lower. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danderman123 Posted May 27 Share Posted May 27 5 hours ago, riclag said: Now I know why some were not happy with Mr Trump or Rfkjr Less votes for biden , more for chase Oliver, the Libertarian choice ! Thanks Chase https://www.votechaseoliver.com/platform https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/5/27/libertarians-pick-chase-oliver-for-us-president-as-trump-kennedy-rejected Stormy Daniels got one vote. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now