Popular Post daveAustin Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 Way to go, Taxland. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralf001 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 12 hours ago, Puccini said: It's the principle that matters. "It won't reduuce the number of tourists", a government official was quoted as saying. Let them get away with 300 Baht and before long, it will be increased, then increased again, and again, and again... Like the 700b departure tax that has not increased since 2007 ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Classic Ray Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 If the money was going to things to make tourism more attractive, like reducing/eliminating the smoke in Chiang Mai or the taxi mafia in Phuket, Samui etc, tourists and Thai business owners would both benefit. It as usual will disappear into fake or overpriced useless projects. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldmanJ Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 With all these so called ways the government is trying to make all this money quickly many people may decide that Thailand is not as good financially as it once was and look for an alternative holiday solution or place to see out there retirement. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 (edited) This has been kicking around for over a year, but the devil's in the detail. They couldn't figure out how to implement it. So it got dropped. Doesn't look like they're much further down the road. Thais were to be exempt. And certain classes of visas. Nobody could come up with a viable method of discrimination. But if everyone pays the departure tax, why not the landing tax? It was said 10% was for insurance. Obviously total bs. How about an environmental tax? If you're flying in it doesn't matter where you're from, does it? Or does it? BTW, who is this man's tailor? Is there a government tailor fitting service? How much does one of these silk smoking jackets cost, and are they subsidised by the public under a Minister's clothing allowance? They've all got at least one. Cha cha loved to flaunt his. Edited June 1 by bradiston 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottdavio Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 3 hours ago, Jonathan Swift said: About $8.00 US. They're welcome to it, if I had to pay, but I'm a resident not a tourist, retirement visa. You may still have to pay your 8$, it says it’s a landing fee 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungditin Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 I remember many years ago we had a 500 baht exit fee that we had to pay in cash when leaving the country. Then this was supposedly incorporated into the ticket. Is that still in place? 300 baht is pennies compared to what tourists spend so I don’t know why anyone would have an issue, but wonder if the 500 is still there and this tax is really 800 in total. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bradiston Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 1 minute ago, Bungditin said: I remember many years ago we had a 500 baht exit fee that we had to pay in cash when leaving the country. Then this was supposedly incorporated into the ticket. Is that still in place? 300 baht is pennies compared to what tourists spend so I don’t know why anyone would have an issue, but wonder if the 500 is still there and this tax is really 800 in total. The departure tax is 700, in the ticket. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralf001 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 2 minutes ago, Bungditin said: I remember many years ago we had a 500 baht exit fee that we had to pay in cash when leaving the country. Then this was supposedly incorporated into the ticket. Is that still in place? 300 baht is pennies compared to what tourists spend so I don’t know why anyone would have an issue, but wonder if the 500 is still there and this tax is really 800 in total. It was increased to Bt.700 in 2007. Rather than a "new" tax surely they could just increase the existing from 700 to 1000. A Bt.300 rise after 17 years does not sound excessive to me. 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingfox1 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 If it moves tax it 🙀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungditin Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 2 minutes ago, Ralf001 said: It was increased to Bt.700 in 2007. Rather than a "new" tax surely they could just increase the existing from 700 to 1000. A Bt.300 rise after 17 years does not sound excessive to me. So it will be 300 baht to come in and 700 to leave. It is very odd that this is not incorporated into the exit fee as you say. I vaguely remember this being floated some years ago and the government line was that the 300 would be used towards covering medical expenses for uninsured tourists. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 15 hours ago, DonniePeverley said: It will just be incorporated into the ticket - well it should be. 300 Baht is quite low, considering what they've lost in waving visas for Indians and Chinese. And Russians given 3 months 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie999 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 13 hours ago, DonniePeverley said: Yeah so ? If 300 baht turns away a nomad (ie a backpacker with a laptop) then i'm all for it. What a sour person you are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brianthainess Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: When initially proposed in late 2022 by former Tourism Minister Phipat Ratchakitprakarn, the revenue from the tourist tax was earmarked for foreigner insurance and bolstering the tourism development fund, aimed at enhancing accessibility and facilities at tourist sites. Addressing his priorities as the new tourism minister, Sermsak outlined plans to enhance tourism infrastructure and promote lesser-known attractions, including recently unearthed ancient sites and UNESCO World Heritage sites. So he is changing what is was originally meant for. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 3 hours ago, hotchilli said: 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: aimed at enhancing accessibility and facilities at tourist sites. And if you think that's where the money will go.. think again. They would have to fix every footpath in the country first just to get to your hotel first. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bob smith Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 Taxland. bob. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brianthainess Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 Will the ' Insurance ' cover accidents from bad infrastructure, footpaths and the like, being beaten by guards, ladyboys, taxi drivers, hit by M/C driving on footpaths............. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bamnutsak Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 15 hours ago, BangkokReady said: Why not 1000 baht? The current Passenger Service Charge for International arrivals is 730 baht. An extra 300 baht would total 1,030 baht. The "730" goes to AoT. The biggest hurdle is "collection" of this 300 baht fee. Thailand wants airlines to create a new line item, airlines, to date, have refused to do this. They could raise the PSC to 1,030 and AoT could remit 300 baht to the Tourism/Sport Ministry but that may be illegal? There is also no way to avoid charging Thais unless the government rebates it. Every Tourism/Sport Minster salivates at the thought of "managing" a NINE BILLION Baht Slush Fund. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 1 hour ago, bradiston said: This has been kicking around for over a year, but the devil's in the detail. They couldn't figure out how to implement it. So it got dropped. Doesn't look like they're much further down the road. Thais were to be exempt. And certain classes of visas. Nobody could come up with a viable method of discrimination. But if everyone pays the departure tax, why not the landing tax? It was said 10% was for insurance. Obviously total bs. How about an environmental tax? If you're flying in it doesn't matter where you're from, does it? Or does it? BTW, who is this man's tailor? Is there a government tailor fitting service? How much does one of these silk smoking jackets cost, and are they subsidised by the public under a Minister's clothing allowance? They've all got at least one. Cha cha loved to flaunt his. Work clothes Tax deductible, I bet the Italian fashion industry will be queuing up for them LOL. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grusa Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 4 hours ago, Jonathan Swift said: About $8.00 US. They're welcome to it, if I had to pay, but I'm a resident not a tourist, retirement visa. Don't worry, you will have to pay it too, if you exit and return! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post freeworld Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 16 hours ago, BangkokReady said: Why not 1000 baht? There is plenty of margin for incremental increases, it was the same with the old now hidden departure tax. They start off low so that it is sort of acceptable tax and then start increasing. Note also the narrative has changed from what this tax was originally intended to be raised for. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post brianthainess Posted June 1 Popular Post Share Posted June 1 Thailand is broke and needs every baht it can get its grubby little paws on. Tax is another thing that irks me no end, when he that can't be mentioned gets his share of it, of which we are not allowed to know how much, yet never pays Tax. 2 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamAndy Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 (edited) That tourism minister looks like Squidward. Edited June 1 by SiamAndy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digger70 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 17 hours ago, redwood1 said: And every baht of this money will go to tourist and expats who have trouble paying their medical bills... If that is True ( But it Ain't) Fine ,than we expats can pay that and a lot more as an Government Health Insurance fee per year. . We Wish. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChaiyaTH Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 Thaxland - The land of taxes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thailand49 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 Land of hub of crooks! I believe with the cost of ticket there is already a landing fee.! This is the same crook who suggested a entry fee 300 Baht in which 50 would go to an accident policy which stall abandon cause airline would not go along in collecting for them Only Hub created " Hub of Crooks " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazykopite Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 Crying out for tourists yet they still insist on bringing in additional charges I sometimes think these officials brains are in there nether regions ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctkong Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 5 hours ago, AhFarangJa said: Exactly, a turnstile at arrivals, deposit money, then return to the plane. Maybe I am mistaken, but was there not a refusal by the airlines to implement this in the ticket as it was only for Foreign Nationals, and therefore a nightmare to police? Someone please put me right if I am getting it wrong. Simplest way of incorporating tourist tax residents exempted is to put an electronic money bin at each immigration counter and ask tourist to slot in the 300 tb into the bin. Immigration officer not touching the cash and electronic money bin secured. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctkong Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 8 minutes ago, crazykopite said: Crying out for tourists yet they still insist on bringing in additional charges I sometimes think these officials brains are in there nether regions ! Different departments different ministries not working in tandem. Each geared towards their own interest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ctkong Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 With this additional fund, maybe foreigners no longer need to pay dual pricing at national parks ? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now