Jump to content

George Galloway Defends Controversial Comments on Gay People


Recommended Posts

Posted

I love this guy. We could have been twins, I swear it. 

  On 6/3/2024 at 7:20 AM, NORDO said:

Yeah George, way to lay it out like it is.   Homosexuality is nature's way of culling out the Human species.   Unfortunately, a few wayward politicians created a way to cash in on more votes to further the campaign.

 

It’s wrong.

it’s immoral.

it’s destroying to the human species.

Previous World leaders found methods to stem their sickness, but today they run amok. 

Expand  

It's an evolutionary dead end. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
  On 6/3/2024 at 8:20 AM, retarius said:

I love this guy. We could have been twins, I swear it. 

It's an evolutionary dead end. 

Expand  

Not necessarily. Looks like you need to brush up on evolutionary theory.

Kin selection

Kin selection is a process whereby natural selection favours a trait due to its positive effects on the reproductive success of an organism's relatives, even when at a cost to the organism's own survival and reproduction.[1] Kin selection can lead to the evolution of altruistic behaviour. It is related to inclusive fitness, which combines the number of offspring produced with the number an individual can ensure the production of by supporting others (weighted by the relatedness between individuals).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kin_selection

 

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
  On 6/4/2024 at 1:28 PM, placeholder said:

So why aren't left handed people and gingers also singled out? After all, they too are not normal. Give your nonsense a rest already. 

Expand  

 

Gingers are also singled out. Same as Jews (no difference according to Dianne Abbott).

 

But yes, being left handed would not be considered the norm either. Nothing wrong with that either. 

Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 12:56 AM, JonnyF said:

 

Gingers are also singled out. Same as Jews (no difference according to Dianne Abbott).

 

But yes, being left handed would not be considered the norm either. Nothing wrong with that either. 

Expand  

 

Then why should any of these genetic traits be elevated into public debate?

Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 12:58 AM, RuamRudy said:

 

Then why should any of these genetic traits be elevated into public debate?

Expand  

 

Why not? Gays themselves are always elevating it into public debate. Many of them define themselves by their sexuality. Often starting sentences with "as a gay man etc." They literally march through the streets with flags and banners singing about it during Pride month.

 

Are you saying only certain groups can discuss these (or other) genetic traits in public? Doesn't seem very inclusive. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

 

 

  On 6/5/2024 at 1:13 AM, JonnyF said:

Gays themselves are always elevating it into public debate.

Expand  

 

Have you ever heard of confirmation bias?

 

  On 6/5/2024 at 1:13 AM, JonnyF said:

Are you saying only certain groups can discuss these (or other) genetic traits in public? Doesn't seem very inclusive. 

Expand  

 

I am saying that the prevalence of ginger haired people is no less important to national debate than the prevalence of homosexuality, in that neither are important. To single one out for critical debate on a public platform is  to stigmatise that group, regardless of whether you think that those within that community deserve stigmatisation. 

Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 1:23 AM, RuamRudy said:

 

 

 

Have you ever heard of confirmation bias?

 

 

I am saying that the prevalence of ginger haired people is no less important to national debate than the prevalence of homosexuality, in that neither are important. To single one out for critical debate on a public platform is  to stigmatise that group, regardless of whether you think that those within that community deserve stigmatisation. 

Expand  

 

I don't think they deserve to be stigmatized.

 

But if they can discuss it, so can everyone else. It's that simple. Or are you so far down the road of identity politics that you believe certain groups can discuss things that others cannot?

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 12:56 AM, JonnyF said:

 

Gingers are also singled out. Same as Jews (no difference according to Dianne Abbott).

 

But yes, being left handed would not be considered the norm either. Nothing wrong with that either. 

Expand  

Really? Politicians single out gingers? What imaginary constituency do you inhabit?

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 6/5/2024 at 1:30 AM, placeholder said:

Really? Politicians single out gingers? What imaginary constituency do you inhabit?

Expand  

 

Maybe you missed Dianne's comments. Likening the treatment Jews get to that of Gingers. 

  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...