What does the average British expat think of Tommy?

[Nick Carter icp]

21 hours ago, Will B Good said:

 

At one point he was spending about £100,000 on gambling in casinos and onlin

 

 

   Tommy was ordered to pay a person some money , but Tommy declared bankruptcy and he claimed that he spent all his money in a casino and had no money left .

   As Tommy was bankrupt, he couldn't pay that person the money  .

[BruceWayne]

https://www.timesofisrael.com/why-are-us-pro-israel-groups-boosting-a-far-right-anti-muslim-uk-extremist/ 

(TIMES OF ISRAEL- an ISRAELI publication)

 

"Robinson is being bankrolled by a nexus of international organizations. Many of those groups, it turns out, are part of the American right-wing infrastructure supporting the [***]Israeli[***] cause."

...

"Robert Shillman, a US-based billionaire who gives frequently to Israeli institutions, financed a fellowship that payed for a position Robinson held in 2017 with a right-wing Canadian website, The Rebel Media, according to The Guardian. (Shillman did not respond to requests for comment.)

Other groups, including the Gatestone Institute, an Israel-focused think tank, and the far-right David Horowitz Freedom Center, have published a series of pieces defending Robinson. One on the Gatestone website was titled, “Swift Injustice: The Case of Tommy Robinson.” (The piece’s author, Bruce Bawer, also did not respond to requests for comment.)"

...

"The support Robinson has received from a web of Israel-backing groups may be about more than just protecting “free speech.” As at least Pipes and Horowitz have made clear, it’s also about advancing his ideas."

 

 

 

Anyway, take it down if it makes u feel beeter or more powerful or whatever - no 1 cares much about what a few boomers in thailand think anyway - and PLUS cats already out the bag on this with anyone who counts 👍

[Nick Carter icp]

15 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/why-are-us-pro-israel-groups-boosting-a-far-right-anti-muslim-uk-extremist/ 

(TIMES OF ISRAEL- an ISRAELI publication)

 

"Robinson is being bankrolled by a nexus of international organizations. Many of those groups, it turns out, are part of the American right-wing infrastructure supporting the [***]Israeli[***] cause."

...

"Robert Shillman, a US-based billionaire who gives frequently to Israeli institutions, financed a fellowship that payed for a position Robinson held in 2017 with a right-wing Canadian website, The Rebel Media, according to The Guardian. (Shillman did not respond to requests for comment.)

Other groups, including the Gatestone Institute, an Israel-focused think tank, and the far-right David Horowitz Freedom Center, have published a series of pieces defending Robinson. One on the Gatestone website was titled, “Swift Injustice: The Case of Tommy Robinson.” (The piece’s author, Bruce Bawer, also did not respond to requests for comment.)"

...

"The support Robinson has received from a web of Israel-backing groups may be about more than just protecting “free speech.” As at least Pipes and Horowitz have made clear, it’s also about advancing his ideas."

 

 

 

Anyway, take it down if it makes u feel beeter or more powerful or whatever - no 1 cares much about what a few boomers in thailand think anyway - and PLUS cats already out the bag on this with anyone who counts 👍

 

   Tommy opposes Islamic extremism and Islamic terrorism . Its hardly surprising that Jewish group's support Tommy in that aspect 

[BruceWayne]

2 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Tommy opposes Islamic extremism and Islamic terrorism . Its hardly surprising that Jewish group's support Tommy in that aspect 

 

Yep, it's an UNvirtuous circle:

 

Israel bombs pallys out of their homes and resettles their land =

Pallys get resettled into Europe - free hotels and spending money courtesay of white taxpaters =

Tommy gets more donations because israel are bombing pallestinians into europe. =

 

Everyones a winner !

APART from indigenous Europeans (inc. the mugs who donate to the fraudulent 'people's champion')

 

Not that you care as your sweating it up with the fan on in your room in Thailand 👍

 

 

 

 

 

[Will B Good]

Christmas has come early. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/28/tommy-robinson-admits-contempt-of-court-over-false-claims-about-refugee?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

[brewsterbudgen]

13 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

Christmas has come early. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/28/tommy-robinson-admits-contempt-of-court-over-false-claims-about-refugee?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Only 18 months?

[jori123]

Is being hounded by legal establishment ,but he will come out of jail even more popular. The rally in London last Saturday drew 25000,no arrests, opposite to the lefty mob

[Kinok Farang]

9 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Christmas has come early. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/28/tommy-robinson-admits-contempt-of-court-over-false-claims-about-refugee?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Meanwhile,labour councillor Ricky Jones is free to walk the streets because all he did was say that "all right wing people should have their throats slit"

Go figure.

By the way Ricky Jones is black.

Nearly forgot about the pissed up labour MP knocking a man to the ground.Do you think this cretin Mike Amesbury should be jailed too?

[Kinok Farang]

11 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Christmas has come early. 
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/28/tommy-robinson-admits-contempt-of-court-over-false-claims-about-refugee?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

At least the courts gave Tommy one last message to give to the dinghy dross.

[georgegeorgia]

Oh what a horrid man !!!

I'm glad he has been jailed 

 

He was the same as that 70yo man jailed for protesting and sadly died in custody recently 

These people don't see the true benefits of cultural enrichment in the community that multi cultural aspects bring 

The UK Government is targeting these objectors and traitors  to cultural enrichment and diversity and jailing them for re-education 

Edited October 29 by georgegeorgia

[Old Croc]

On 6/2/2024 at 1:36 PM, Kinok Farang said:

This is mostly for the Brits on here but lesser nations can join in too.

It's sad that the sense of entitlement of some Brits lingers long beyond the era when Britain was considered a superior nation to the unfortunate countries they invaded, plundered and enslaved.  

[Kinok Farang]

1 hour ago, Old Croc said:

It's sad that the sense of entitlement of some Brits lingers long beyond the era when Britain was considered a superior nation to the unfortunate countries they invaded, plundered and enslaved.  

But even sadder that some people didn't have the brains to understand that the original poster was only having a laugh.

[simon43]

Tommy is a top bloke!

[Kinok Farang]

2 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

Oh what a horrid man !!!

I'm glad he has been jailed 

 

He was the same as that 70yo man jailed for protesting and sadly died in custody recently 

These people don't see the true benefits of cultural enrichment in the community that multi cultural aspects bring 

The UK Government is targeting these objectors and traitors  to cultural enrichment and diversity and jailing them for re-education 

Up to now English people,have not joined in with the stabbings,muggings and rapes that your cultural enrichment has given us.

[josephbloggs]

49 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

Up to now English people,have not joined in with the stabbings,muggings and rapes that your cultural enrichment has given us.

Yeah, no Engish people ever get convicted of rapes, stabbings, muggings. Weird that Yaxley has plenty of paedo white friends though, you know, the ones he defended.

 

That was truly one of the most moronic statements I have ever read on here, well done.

[georgegeorgia]

1 hour ago, Kinok Farang said:

Up to now English people,have not joined in with the stabbings,muggings and rapes that your cultural enrichment has given us.

Oh please , welcome these people!

[Old Croc]

4 hours ago, Kinok Farang said:

Up to now English people,have not joined in with the stabbings,muggings and rapes that your cultural enrichment has given us.

Insulting other nationalities is hilarious!

Funny how you don't find it so when it comes back at you.

[Kinok Farang]

1 hour ago, Old Croc said:

Insulting other nationalities is hilarious!

Funny how you don't find it so when it comes back at you.

Ok,i give in.Please don't reply.

[BruceWayne]

.

Edited October 31 by BruceWayne

[BruceWayne]

On 10/29/2024 at 2:46 AM, simon43 said:

Tommy is a top bloke!

 

With weary predictability, there is yet ANOTHER high-profile legal fees fundraiser, this time for Stephen "Tommy Robinson" Yaxley-Lennon.

 

"Robinson" only launched the campaign a matter of days ago, but has already raised over £100,000.

Over £100k in a matter of days?

 

Nice work if you can get it. The average employed person in the UK would have to work full-time for around three years to earn that much.

 

But of course,

the MSM has obligingly

made our Tommeh very famous,

so

whenever

he wants

hundreds of thousands of pounds,

he instantly gets it.

 

Now, yes yes, I know, the fundraiser alleges this money is "just for legal fees and none of it goes to Tommy himself".

 

Well, first of all,

there's no way of knowing

if this statement is actually true,

as the platform in question is not a specific legal fees platform, where the solicitors are explicitly named, and it's verifiably clear the money really is just going to pay their fees.

It could be going anywhere and

we'd have

no way of knowing.

 

Now, examine all of the following examples closely and ask: what is the common theme?

 

Tommy Robinson had to give Jamal Hijazi money (£100,000)

Andrew Bridgen had to give Matt Hancock money (£40,000)

Joey Barton had to give Jeremy Vine money (£75,000)

And Richard D. Hall has to give the Hibberts money (amount to be confirmed).

 

All these people lost their cases, and were therefore required to give the victorious parties money.

 

So the question is: where did the aforementioned people get this money?

From their conspiratorially-minded supporters - that is,

from

you/us.

 

That means that anybody who funded these people has effectively been taxed for believing in conspiracy theories, because their money has been handed straight to the very people they're railing against.

 

It's a trap and a trick.

 

Just like the National Lottery promises easy riches, but in reality makes poor people poorer (so it's a tax on the poor), these high-profile, MSM-promoted, controlled opposition characters going to court promising to "expose the truth" and "get justice", are in reality simply giving your money to the enemy.

 

We should all know better than to ever fund such cases because we all know that the courts are completely corrupt.

 

These are the same courts, after all, that openly order the execution of children, overruling the wishes of their families and experts around the world who offer to treat them.

Do you therefore expect anyone, especially a "state dissident", to get a fair trial in these places?

 

As I said, that's a key purpose of these high-profile show trials. To trick conspiracists into bankrolling the very state actors they are trying to expose.

 

If you believe otherwise, please provide some examples of where a high-profile, MSM-promoted "anti-establishment" figure has fundraised for a court case that they've actually won.

 

(Remember the Simon Dolan debacle... This wealthy businessman took nearly half a million pounds from the public to "take the government to court" over lockdown, and got absolutely nowhere. A lot of very rich establishment lawyers got a lot richer though.)

 

They never win. They always lose and, consequently, they always give the money (the money donated to them by genuine dissidents) to the enemy.

 

And it's all by design, because whilst

illegitimate actors

hoover up whatever spare money

conspiracists may have,

they succeed in

keeping real grassroots opposition movements,

which desperately need funding to have any real impact, s

tarved of resources and

therefore unable to have any real sway.

 

If you're going to donate to a legal funds crowdfunder, then

please do your due diligence

and ensure that it's not just a cynical

wealth transfer exercise

so your money ends up with the people you're trying to fight against.

 

The aforementioned high-profile legal fundraisers have raised millions of pounds between them, and

have achieved a big fat nothing - rather, they have simply further enriched the coffers of the establishment.

Can you imagine what legitimate enterprises could do with that kind of money?

 

I have increasingly come to think of these

legal fundraisers as a conspiracy tax,

a scheme which works the same way the National Lottery does as a tax on the poor.

When you're poor, your deepest desire is to win a big sum of money.

When you're a conspiracy theorist, your deepest desire is to see the truth exposed on the world stage.

 

So, the establishment cynically exploits the dreams of the poor with the National Lottery - which really just hoovers up money from disadvantaged people and passes it on to the wealthy - and likewise, exploits conspiracy theorists by setting up intelligence assets who claim to be "exposing the truth by going to court", but just end up giving your money straight back to the establishment and changing nothing (except for maybe tightening up free speech laws a bit more).

 

That's the con. That's how it works.

 

It keeps your valuable energy,

attention,

and the key resource of money,

flowing towards the very people

you think you're railing against.

 

If you've got spare cash and really want to make a difference, please don't give it to famous media celebrities like Tommy etc., but rather, invest it in projects and people with no mainstream media profile, because they are the ones who really need it. Any of my recommended Substack authors, for example, represent extremely hardworking real journalists who often struggle for money, sometimes meaning (as in the case of my friend Alex Kriel, founder of the excellent Thinking Coalition) they have to give up.

 

There are so many brilliant resistance initiatives out there, too, like the Good Food Project, run by genuine activists who've been at this for years, but who will never be

promoted

to notoriety by a string of

"hit pieces"

in the mainstream media - because they're legitimate, and

...

 

***legitimate people never get that kind of publicity.***

 

So in closing, I think we can all agree that we already pay more than enough in taxes as it is.

 

Let's at least make sure we're not paying the "Tommy tax" too.

 

https://miri.substack.com 

Edited October 31 by BruceWayne

[BruceWayne]

 

 

Is Tommy Robinson an establishment actor?

 

MSM promote him all the time - seems off 

[Kinok Farang]

2 hours ago, BruceWayne said:

 

With weary predictability, there is yet ANOTHER high-profile legal fees fundraiser, this time for Stephen "Tommy Robinson" Yaxley-Lennon.

 

"Robinson" only launched the campaign a matter of days ago, but has already raised over £100,000.

Over £100k in a matter of days?

 

Nice work if you can get it. The average employed person in the UK would have to work full-time for around three years to earn that much.

 

But of course,

the MSM has obligingly

made our Tommeh very famous,

so

whenever

he wants

hundreds of thousands of pounds,

he instantly gets it.

 

Now, yes yes, I know, the fundraiser alleges this money is "just for legal fees and none of it goes to Tommy himself".

 

Well, first of all,

there's no way of knowing

if this statement is actually true,

as the platform in question is not a specific legal fees platform, where the solicitors are explicitly named, and it's verifiably clear the money really is just going to pay their fees.

It could be going anywhere and

we'd have

no way of knowing.

 

Now, examine all of the following examples closely and ask: what is the common theme?

 

Tommy Robinson had to give Jamal Hijazi money (£100,000)

Andrew Bridgen had to give Matt Hancock money (£40,000)

Joey Barton had to give Jeremy Vine money (£75,000)

And Richard D. Hall has to give the Hibberts money (amount to be confirmed).

 

All these people lost their cases, and were therefore required to give the victorious parties money.

 

So the question is: where did the aforementioned people get this money?

From their conspiratorially-minded supporters - that is,

from

you/us.

 

That means that anybody who funded these people has effectively been taxed for believing in conspiracy theories, because their money has been handed straight to the very people they're railing against.

 

It's a trap and a trick.

 

Just like the National Lottery promises easy riches, but in reality makes poor people poorer (so it's a tax on the poor), these high-profile, MSM-promoted, controlled opposition characters going to court promising to "expose the truth" and "get justice", are in reality simply giving your money to the enemy.

 

We should all know better than to ever fund such cases because we all know that the courts are completely corrupt.

 

These are the same courts, after all, that openly order the execution of children, overruling the wishes of their families and experts around the world who offer to treat them.

Do you therefore expect anyone, especially a "state dissident", to get a fair trial in these places?

 

As I said, that's a key purpose of these high-profile show trials. To trick conspiracists into bankrolling the very state actors they are trying to expose.

 

If you believe otherwise, please provide some examples of where a high-profile, MSM-promoted "anti-establishment" figure has fundraised for a court case that they've actually won.

 

(Remember the Simon Dolan debacle... This wealthy businessman took nearly half a million pounds from the public to "take the government to court" over lockdown, and got absolutely nowhere. A lot of very rich establishment lawyers got a lot richer though.)

 

They never win. They always lose and, consequently, they always give the money (the money donated to them by genuine dissidents) to the enemy.

 

And it's all by design, because whilst

illegitimate actors

hoover up whatever spare money

conspiracists may have,

they succeed in

keeping real grassroots opposition movements,

which desperately need funding to have any real impact, s

tarved of resources and

therefore unable to have any real sway.

 

If you're going to donate to a legal funds crowdfunder, then

please do your due diligence

and ensure that it's not just a cynical

wealth transfer exercise

so your money ends up with the people you're trying to fight against.

 

The aforementioned high-profile legal fundraisers have raised millions of pounds between them, and

have achieved a big fat nothing - rather, they have simply further enriched the coffers of the establishment.

Can you imagine what legitimate enterprises could do with that kind of money?

 

I have increasingly come to think of these

legal fundraisers as a conspiracy tax,

a scheme which works the same way the National Lottery does as a tax on the poor.

When you're poor, your deepest desire is to win a big sum of money.

When you're a conspiracy theorist, your deepest desire is to see the truth exposed on the world stage.

 

So, the establishment cynically exploits the dreams of the poor with the National Lottery - which really just hoovers up money from disadvantaged people and passes it on to the wealthy - and likewise, exploits conspiracy theorists by setting up intelligence assets who claim to be "exposing the truth by going to court", but just end up giving your money straight back to the establishment and changing nothing (except for maybe tightening up free speech laws a bit more).

 

That's the con. That's how it works.

 

It keeps your valuable energy,

attention,

and the key resource of money,

flowing towards the very people

you think you're railing against.

 

If you've got spare cash and really want to make a difference, please don't give it to famous media celebrities like Tommy etc., but rather, invest it in projects and people with no mainstream media profile, because they are the ones who really need it. Any of my recommended Substack authors, for example, represent extremely hardworking real journalists who often struggle for money, sometimes meaning (as in the case of my friend Alex Kriel, founder of the excellent Thinking Coalition) they have to give up.

 

There are so many brilliant resistance initiatives out there, too, like the Good Food Project, run by genuine activists who've been at this for years, but who will never be

promoted

to notoriety by a string of

"hit pieces"

in the mainstream media - because they're legitimate, and

...

 

***legitimate people never get that kind of publicity.***

 

So in closing, I think we can all agree that we already pay more than enough in taxes as it is.

 

Let's at least make sure we're not paying the "Tommy tax" too.

 

https://miri.substack.com 

can you repeat that please?

[BruceWayne]

3 minutes ago, Kinok Farang said:

can you repeat that please?

 

 

 

Here you go

 

x

 

[GammaGlobulin]