Jump to content

Palang Pracharath Dismisses Exit Rumours Amidst Political Turbulence


webfact

Recommended Posts

This is very interesting. At first, what in the world is a brought home and paroled, convict at large while in exile very sick person with severe health problems accused for lese majeste doing attached to a news article about Thailand´s political future? At second, how in the world can 40 senators with direct connection to Palang Pracharath and Pravit Wongsuwan go together and impeach the PM for appointing a formerly convicted person as minister in his office? Of course that is very wrong, as it is with Thaksin´s involvement in today´s politics. However, they have to clean up their own dirty rug, before complaining about others. Have about Mr. Prompao? How can he be in the government after drug related offences?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

How can he be in the government after drug related offences?

Apparently it was an Australian incident therefore not valid in Thailand.... lucky for Phompao Thailand is so forgiving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Apparently it was an Australian incident therefore not valid in Thailand.... lucky for Phompao Thailand is so forgiving.

Under that logic, no foreigner should be deported from Thailand to face charges in their home country.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hotchilli said:

Apparently it was an Australian incident therefore not valid in Thailand.... lucky for Phompao Thailand is so forgiving.

 

That's right.  The constitution just says that convicted felons sentenced to time in prison may not be ministers but doesn't specify where those convictions may take place which gave some wiggle room.  In the end the judges in their great wisdom ruled that they were unable to say with any confidence that drug convictions in Australia adhered to the same high levels of soundness as in Thailand and that therefore they had to give the deputy minister the benefit of the doubt and deem the Australian conviction as null and void for the purposes of his qualifications for a cabinet role. Some bright sparks argued that because the offence for which the Ozzies convicted him was in fact smuggling heroin from Thailand to Australia and the Ozzie police nabbed him because they were tipped off by the Thai DEA, there must be enough evidence to try and convict him in Thailand which could surely be done without double jeopardy, if a Thai court had ruled his Ozzie conviction as null and void.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...