Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, Captain Monday said:

The Snowden case is different 

and then he defected to Russia. 

Last I saw of him on a web broadcast he still had that disgusting carbuncle on his neck

Don’t they have dermatologists in Moscow?

 

 

IMG_4468.jpeg

He had little choice in the matter. The US were ready to (and did) force the airplanes down just on a suspicion he was onboard. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, zyphodb said:

 

How can he possibly be a traitor to the USA if he's Australian?

He's not a "traitor"; he's a "trader." He traded the publication of information designated as Top Secret by the US for money - and eventually seven years in prison and a felony conviction. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, SpaceKadet said:

You do know that Julian is not and American citizen, right?

Yes, just like the founding fathers of my country ,at one time.

Posted
48 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

He's not a "traitor"; he's a "trader." He traded the publication of information designated as Top Secret by the US for money 

Can you provide a link for that claim, please? Genuine request.

Posted

I wonder how we would judge him if, for example, the secrets he published resulted in the killing of innocents. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Skeptic7 said:

HeroSame with Snowden. Both should be applauded and honored

I agree.

 

Next close up for ever The Guantanamo Bay detention camp. An other shameful thing.

They closed one in Lithuania where they had tortured Iraq war prisoneers in secrecy.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I feel curious about this whole saga. Maybe someone knows more than I. Regarding the US diplomatic cables, the whistleblower never disclosed information to the public directly but to Wikileaks, a whistleblower outlet. Wikileaks is Australian (I think) so the whistleblower might have been accused of treason if the information went to an enemy country. Australia is not an enemy so treason was off the table but espionage laws were employed.

 

Wikileaks then gave their information to newspapers like The Guardian, The New York Times, and Der Spiegel, and didn't actually release anything to the public directly. The public had never even heard of Wikileaks.

 

Those newspapers were never charged with anything. Yes, Wikileaks provided the information given them by a whistleblower but the decision to publish was made by the media involved. They, or their editors, were never charged.

 

For some reason, Daniel Ellsberg was not charged with anything in 1971 for his release of the damaging Pentagon Papers. Mark Felt provided information on the Watergate scandal in 2005 to Woodward and Bernstein and neither he nor they were ever charged with anything.

 

Why was only Assange charged and not Wikileaks as an organization and the other media who did the actual publishing?

 

Posted
13 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

There's nothing I can see in that article that says Assange was paid money in exchange for leaking US documents. 

 

Can you point it out to me?

"In October 2017, Julian Assange said WikiLeaks had made a 50,000% return on Bitcoin. By that December, it had raised at least $25 million in Bitcoin. WikiLeaks - Wikipedia

Posted
10 hours ago, WDSmart said:

"In October 2017, Julian Assange said WikiLeaks had made a 50,000% return on Bitcoin. By that December, it had raised at least $25 million in Bitcoin. WikiLeaks - Wikipedia

That says WikiLeaks had made money on Bitcoin (and had raised money in Bitcoin). Again, it does not constitute evidence that he was given money in exchange for US secret documents.

Posted
On 6/29/2024 at 5:56 PM, GroveHillWanderer said:

That says WikiLeaks had made money on Bitcoin (and had raised money in Bitcoin). Again, it does not constitute evidence that he was given money in exchange for US secret documents.

Much of his success with Bitcoin was due to his publishing of these documents. I'm just saying he made money doing so. I'm not saying that was his only or even primary motive for doing this. 

Anyway, he's now admitted to his crime and is a convicted felon. I don't know what's happened to all his money, but i did see he asked for donations to help him charter the private flight back to Australia. 

I hope we don't ever hear any more about him.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, WDSmart said:

Anyway, he's now admitted to his crime and is a convicted felon.

That would qualify him to run for office, the highest spot, but since he's Aussie he can't...

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...